Lee I M, Paffenbarger R S
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb 1;151(3):293-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010205.
Physical activity is associated with better health; however, the optimal intensity of activity remains unclear. A total of 13,485 men (mean age, 57.5 years) from the Harvard Alumni Health Study reported their walking, stair climbing, and sports/recreation in 1977. Between 1977 and 1992, 2,539 died. After adjusting for the different activity components, distance walked and storeys climbed independently predicted longevity (p, trend = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). Light activities (<4 multiples of resting metabolic rate (METs)) were not associated with reduced mortality rates, moderate activities (4-<6 METs) appeared somewhat beneficial, and vigorous activities (> or =6 METs) clearly predicted lower mortality rates (p, trend = 0.72, 0.07, and <0.001, respectively). These data provide some support for current recommendations that emphasize moderate intensity activity; they also clearly indicate a benefit of vigorous activity.
体育活动与更健康的身体状况相关;然而,最佳活动强度仍不明确。来自哈佛校友健康研究的总共13485名男性(平均年龄57.5岁)在1977年报告了他们的步行、爬楼梯以及运动/娱乐情况。在1977年至1992年期间,有2539人死亡。在对不同活动成分进行调整后,步行距离和爬楼层数各自独立预测了长寿情况(p趋势分别为0.004和<0.001)。轻度活动(<静息代谢率的4倍(梅脱))与死亡率降低无关,中度活动(4 - <6梅脱)似乎有一定益处,而剧烈活动(≥6梅脱)明显预示着较低的死亡率(p趋势分别为0.72、0.07和<0.001)。这些数据为当前强调中等强度活动的建议提供了一些支持;它们也明确表明了剧烈活动的益处。