Suppr超能文献

在高血压治疗中使用地拉普利与马尼地平以阻止2型糖尿病相关性肾病

Delapril versus manidipine in hypertensive therapy to halt the type-2-diabetes-mellitus-associated nephropathy.

作者信息

Shiba T, Inoue M, Tada H, Hayashi Y, Okuda Y, Fujita R, Makino F, Takahasi C, Kageyama S, Kitamura S, Iwamoto Y

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000 Feb;47(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00114-x.

Abstract

Thirty-nine hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were followed under long-term treatment (mean, 20.7 months) with manidipine hydrochloride, a Ca antagonist, or delapril hydrochloride, an ACE inhibitor, at nine institutions. Both the treatments showed similar antihypertensive effects, although slight but significantly larger decreases were observed in systolic and mean blood pressures at months 12 and 24 in the patients treated with manidipine (P < 0.02). The urinary albumin excretion index (AEI) tended to increase throughout the study in both treatment groups, but no significant difference in AEI was observed between the two treatment groups at any time point. Overt albuminuria developed in four patients on manidipine but did not appear in any of the patients on delapril. The risk of progression to overt albuminuria was significantly different between manidipine and delapril groups (P = 0.011). No increase in serum creatinine (Cr) was observed with delapril. The average excretion indexes of tubular markers such as beta2-microglobulin, alpha1-microglobulin, and NAG tended to be higher in the patients on manidipine than in those on delapril. Taken in sum, these findings suggest that the ACE inhibitor delapril is more beneficial than the Ca antagonist manidipine in the treatment of diabetic renal diseases via mechanisms other than the blood pressure regulation, partly through their different effects on tubular function. In conclusion, delapril was significantly more effective than manidipine in inhibiting progression to overt albuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

摘要

39例2型糖尿病高血压患者在9家机构接受了长期治疗(平均20.7个月),分别使用钙拮抗剂盐酸马尼地平或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂盐酸地拉普利。两种治疗均显示出相似的降压效果,不过,在接受马尼地平治疗的患者中,第12个月和第24个月时收缩压和平均血压有轻微但显著更大幅度的下降(P<0.02)。在整个研究过程中,两个治疗组的尿白蛋白排泄指数(AEI)均有升高趋势,但在任何时间点,两个治疗组之间的AEI均无显著差异。接受马尼地平治疗的4例患者出现了显性蛋白尿,而接受地拉普利治疗的患者均未出现。马尼地平组和地拉普利组进展为显性蛋白尿的风险有显著差异(P = 0.011)。地拉普利治疗未观察到血清肌酐(Cr)升高。马尼地平组患者的β2微球蛋白、α1微球蛋白和NAG等肾小管标志物的平均排泄指数往往高于地拉普利组患者。综上所述,这些发现表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂地拉普利在治疗糖尿病肾病方面比钙拮抗剂马尼地平更有益,其机制可能并非通过血压调节,部分原因是它们对肾小管功能的影响不同。总之,在抑制高血压2型糖尿病患者进展为显性蛋白尿方面,地拉普利比马尼地平显著更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验