Pearson M G
Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College, London, UK.
Chest. 2000 Feb;117(2 Suppl):38S-41S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.2_suppl.38s.
Guidelines for a variety of diseases have now been produced. However, implementation of guidelines requires that the medical profession is willing to conform to patterns of diagnostic and treatment behavior set down by others. This may not happen in practice. Early experience in the United Kingdom was gained with the introduction of guidelines for the management of asthma. For a number of years, there have been improvements in practice, but deficiencies still exist. When the introduction of guidelines for the management of COPD was planned, a new approach was taken with a consortium of the British Thoracic Society, pharmaceutical companies, and medical equipment companies being formed to promote their use. Early studies show that COPD care starts from an even lower baseline than asthma; there is poor understanding of objective diagnosis of COPD in both primary and secondary care.
现在已经制定了针对多种疾病的指南。然而,指南的实施要求医疗行业愿意遵循他人制定的诊断和治疗行为模式。在实际中这可能无法实现。英国在引入哮喘管理指南方面获得了早期经验。多年来,实践中有了一些改善,但不足之处仍然存在。当计划引入慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理指南时,采取了一种新方法,成立了由英国胸科学会、制药公司和医疗设备公司组成的联盟来推广这些指南的使用。早期研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺疾病的护理起点甚至比哮喘更低;在初级和二级护理中,对慢性阻塞性肺疾病客观诊断的了解都很差。