• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Severity prediction rules in community acquired pneumonia: a validation study.社区获得性肺炎严重程度预测规则:一项验证研究。
Thorax. 2000 Mar;55(3):219-23. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.3.219.
2
Defining prognostic factors in the elderly with community acquired pneumonia: a case controlled study of patients aged > or = 75 yrs.确定老年社区获得性肺炎患者的预后因素:一项针对年龄≥75岁患者的病例对照研究。
Eur Respir J. 2001 Feb;17(2):200-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.17202000.
3
Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission.社区获得性肺炎:病因及入院时严重程度标准的实用性。
Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1010-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1010.
4
Prospective comparison of severity scores for predicting clinically relevant outcomes for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.预测社区获得性肺炎住院患者临床相关结局的严重程度评分的前瞻性比较。
Chest. 2009 Jun;135(6):1572-1579. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2179. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
5
Comparative validation of prognostic rules for community-acquired pneumonia in an elderly population.老年人群社区获得性肺炎预后规则的比较验证
Eur Respir J. 1999 Aug;14(2):370-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b22.x.
6
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines to predict an intensive care unit admission.重症社区获得性肺炎:美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会预测入住重症监护病房指南的验证
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 15;48(4):377-85. doi: 10.1086/596307.
7
[CCERW: a new rule to predict treatment failure in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in middle aged and elderly people].[CCERW:预测中老年社区获得性肺炎患者治疗失败的新规则]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Jan;23(1):10-7.
8
Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society criteria to predict severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会标准对预测肺炎链球菌所致重症社区获得性肺炎的验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.037.
9
Validation of predictive rules and indices of severity for community acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎预测规则及严重程度指标的验证
Thorax. 2004 May;59(5):421-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2003.008110.
10
Adult community-acquired pneumonia in Malaysia: prediction of mortality from severity assessment on admission.马来西亚成人社区获得性肺炎:入院时严重程度评估对死亡率的预测
Respirology. 2004 Aug;9(3):379-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00604.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing large scale and selected feature learning for community acquired pneumonia prognosis prediction using clinical data: a stacked ensemble approach.使用临床数据比较大规模和选定特征学习在社区获得性肺炎预后预测中的应用:一种堆叠集成方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 10;15(1):12319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95941-8.
2
The role of CTGF and MFG-E8 in the prognosis assessment of SCAP: a study combining machine learning and nomogram analysis.结缔组织生长因子和乳脂肪球表皮生长因子8在重症社区获得性肺炎预后评估中的作用:一项结合机器学习和列线图分析的研究
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 23;16:1446415. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1446415. eCollection 2025.
3
Prognostic clinical decision support for pneumonia in the emergency department: A randomized trial.急诊科肺炎的预后临床决策支持:一项随机试验。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Sep;19(9):802-811. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13391. Epub 2024 May 26.
4
[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization].[成人社区获得性肺炎住院治疗管理指南]
Med Intensiva. 2005 Feb;29(1):21-62. doi: 10.1016/S0210-5691(05)74199-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
5
Adjunctive intravenous then oral vitamin C for moderate and severe community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults: feasibility of randomized controlled trial.辅助静脉内然后口服维生素 C 治疗住院成人中、重度社区获得性肺炎:随机对照试验的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 23;13(1):11879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37934-z.
6
A Novel Index in the Prediction of Pneumonia Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.一种预测急性缺血性脑卒中后肺炎的新指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(22):15306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215306.
7
Immune-Mediated Mechanisms in Patients Testing Positive for SARS-CoV-2: Protocol for a Multianalysis Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎核酸检测阳性患者的免疫介导机制:一项多分析研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 25;11(1):e29892. doi: 10.2196/29892.
8
Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Increased the Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.急性下呼吸道感染增加了老年稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者发生心血管事件和全因死亡的风险。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 17;8:711264. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.711264. eCollection 2021.
9
The Importance of Respiratory Rate Monitoring: From Healthcare to Sport and Exercise.呼吸频率监测的重要性:从医疗保健到运动和锻炼。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;20(21):6396. doi: 10.3390/s20216396.
10
Usefulness of circulating microRNAs miR-146a and miR-16-5p as prognostic biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia.循环 microRNAs miR-146a 和 miR-16-5p 在社区获得性肺炎中作为预后生物标志物的有用性。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0240926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240926. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A prognostic rule for elderly patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎老年住院患者的预后规则
Am J Med. 1999 Jan;106(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00369-6.
2
Safely increasing the proportion of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated as outpatients: an interventional trial.安全提高社区获得性肺炎门诊治疗患者的比例:一项干预性试验
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jun 22;158(12):1350-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.12.1350.
3
Trends in drug-resistant tuberculosis in the United States, 1993-1996.1993 - 1996年美国耐多药结核病的趋势
JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):833-7.
4
Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the National Health Service in the UK.社区获得性肺炎:英国国民医疗服务体系的年度成本
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jul;10(7):1530-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071530.
5
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.一种用于识别社区获得性肺炎低风险患者的预测规则。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.
6
Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission.社区获得性肺炎:病因及入院时严重程度标准的实用性。
Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1010-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1010.
7
Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: A multivariate analysis of risk and prognostic factors.老年人社区获得性肺炎:风险及预后因素的多变量分析
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;154(5):1450-5. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912763.
8
Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia?社区获得性肺炎患者就诊时的肺部影像学表现能否预测死亡率?
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Oct 28;156(19):2206-12.
9
Community-acquired pneumonia in older patients.老年患者社区获得性肺炎
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 May;44(5):539-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01439.x.
10
Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎患者的预后与转归:一项荟萃分析
JAMA. 1996 Jan 10;275(2):134-41.

社区获得性肺炎严重程度预测规则:一项验证研究。

Severity prediction rules in community acquired pneumonia: a validation study.

作者信息

Lim W S, Lewis S, Macfarlane J T

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.

出版信息

Thorax. 2000 Mar;55(3):219-23. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.3.219.

DOI:10.1136/thorax.55.3.219
PMID:10679541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1745710/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The British Thoracic Society (BTS) developed a rule (BTSr) based on severity criteria to predict short term mortality in adults admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, neither the BTSr nor a recent modification of it (mBTSr) have been validated in the UK. A case-control study was conducted in a typical UK population to determine the clinical factors predictive of mortality and to assess the performance of these rules.

METHODS

Cases were drawn from all patients with CAP who died in 1997 in five large hospitals in the Mid Trent area. Controls were randomly selected from survivors. Factors associated with mortality were identified following review of medical case notes and performance of the severity prediction rules assessed.

RESULTS

Age >65 years, temperature <37 degrees C, respiratory rate >24 breaths/min, mental confusion, urea concentration of >7 mmol/l, sodium concentration of <135 mmol/l, and the presence of a pleural effusion, all determined on admission, were independently associated with in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. The BTSr was 52% sensitive and 79% specific in predicting death while the mBTSr displayed 66% sensitivity and 73% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of three of the four factors (presence of mental confusion, raised respiratory rate, raised urea) used in the mBTSr as predictors of mortality is confirmed. However, the BTSr and mBTSr did not perform as well in this validation study which included a high proportion (48%) of elderly patients (> or =75 years) compared with the derivation studies.

摘要

背景

英国胸科学会(BTS)制定了一项基于严重程度标准的规则(BTSr),用于预测因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)入院的成年人的短期死亡率。然而,BTSr及其最近的修订版(mBTSr)在英国均未得到验证。在典型的英国人群中进行了一项病例对照研究,以确定预测死亡率的临床因素,并评估这些规则的性能。

方法

病例来自1997年在中特伦特地区五家大型医院死亡的所有CAP患者。对照组从幸存者中随机选取。在查阅医疗病例记录并评估严重程度预测规则的性能后,确定与死亡率相关的因素。

结果

多因素分析显示,入院时确定的年龄>65岁、体温<37摄氏度、呼吸频率>24次/分钟、精神错乱、尿素浓度>7 mmol/L、钠浓度<135 mmol/L以及存在胸腔积液均与院内死亡率独立相关。BTSr预测死亡的敏感性为52%,特异性为79%,而mBTSr的敏感性为66%,特异性为73%。

结论

mBTSr中用作死亡率预测指标的四个因素中的三个(精神错乱、呼吸频率升高、尿素升高)的价值得到了证实。然而,与推导研究相比,在这项验证研究中,BTSr和mBTSr的表现不佳,该研究纳入了高比例(48%)的老年患者(≥75岁)。