• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰用于测量压疮患病率的国家登记表的研制。

The development of a national registration form to measure the prevalence of pressure ulcers in The Netherlands.

作者信息

Bours G J, Halfens R J, Lubbers M, Haalboom J R

机构信息

Maastricht University, Department of Nursing Science, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Nov;45(11):28-33, 36-8, 40.

PMID:10687656
Abstract

To gain insight into the prevalence of pressure ulcers in Dutch healthcare institutions, a national registration form to measure the prevalence of pressure ulcers annually in different healthcare settings was developed based on a literature study and responses from a Delphi panel. The reliability and the feasibility of the form devised were tested in a pilot study conducted in a university hospital, a nursing home, and in a home healthcare setting. Interrater reliability of the grading system varied between the institutions from 0.49 to 0.97 (Cohen's Kappa). In the home healthcare setting, interrater reliability was 0.80 (Pearson correlation coefficient) for the total score on the Braden scale. The prevalence rates were 10.1% (n = 368) in the university hospital, 12.7% (n = 1,541) in the home healthcare setting, and 83.6% (n = 122) in the nursing home, although the latter figure seemed to be somewhat exaggerated. The most common lesions were found on the sacrum and below the knee (heel and malleolus). The pilot study concluded that it is possible to collect accurate and reliable data on the scope and severity of pressure ulcers with a uniform instrument in different healthcare settings.

摘要

为深入了解荷兰医疗机构中压疮的患病率,在文献研究和德尔菲专家组反馈的基础上,开发了一种全国性登记表,用于每年测量不同医疗环境中压疮的患病率。所设计表格的可靠性和可行性在一家大学医院、一家疗养院和家庭医疗环境中进行的一项试点研究中进行了测试。各机构间分级系统的评分者间信度在0.49至0.97之间(科恩kappa系数)。在家庭医疗环境中,Braden量表总分的评分者间信度为0.80(皮尔逊相关系数)。大学医院的患病率为10.1%(n = 368),家庭医疗环境中为12.7%(n = 1541),疗养院中为83.6%(n = 122),不过后者的数据似乎有些夸张。最常见的损伤部位是骶骨和膝盖以下(足跟和内、外踝)。试点研究得出结论,使用统一的工具可以在不同医疗环境中收集关于压疮范围和严重程度的准确可靠数据。

相似文献

1
The development of a national registration form to measure the prevalence of pressure ulcers in The Netherlands.荷兰用于测量压疮患病率的国家登记表的研制。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Nov;45(11):28-33, 36-8, 40.
2
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
3
Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics.德国养老院和急症护理医院中的压疮:患病率、发生频率及溃疡特征。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Feb;52(2):20-33.
4
Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.解释荷兰和德国之间压疮患病率的国家差异——根据个人风险因素和机构质量指标进行调整。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00958.x.
5
Differences in prevalence of pressure ulcers between the Netherlands and Germany--associations between risk, prevention and occurrence of pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes.荷兰与德国压力性溃疡患病率的差异——医院和养老院中压力性溃疡的风险、预防与发生之间的关联
J Clin Nurs. 2008 May;17(9):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02225.x.
6
Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany.德国压疮的患病率。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Feb;14(2):165-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01037.x.
7
An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.在两家养老院对Braden量表进行的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.
8
Pressure ulcers in community-based older adults receiving home health care. Prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.接受家庭医疗护理的社区老年人中的压疮。患病率、发病率及相关危险因素。
Adv Wound Care. 1999 Sep;12(7):339-51.
9
Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Results of a cross-sectional survey.荷兰重症监护病房压力性溃疡的患病率、危险因素及预防。横断面调查结果。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Oct;27(10):1599-605. doi: 10.1007/s001340101061.
10
[Pressure in nursing care: Outcomes of a prevalence study of pressure ulcers in Austrian hospitals and nursing homes].[护理中的压力:奥地利医院和养老院压疮患病率研究的结果]
Pflege Z. 2011 Jun;64(6):356-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk-adjusted trend in national inpatient fall rates observed from 2011 to 2019 in acute care hospitals in Switzerland: a repeated multicentre cross-sectional study.2011 年至 2019 年瑞士急性护理医院中观察到的全国住院患者跌倒率的风险调整趋势:一项重复的多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e082417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082417.
2
Evidence for publicly reported quality indicators in residential long-term care: a systematic review.有证据表明,在住宅长期护理中报告了质量指标:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):1408. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08804-7.
3
Critical Care Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Pressure Injury Treatment: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.
重症监护护士关于压力性损伤治疗的知识、态度和实践:一项全国性横断面调查。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 16;15:2125-2134. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S389706. eCollection 2022.
4
Critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pressure injury prevention in China: A multicentric cross-sectional survey.中国重症监护病房护士压力性损伤预防知识、态度和实践的多中心横断面调查。
Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):381-390. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13886. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
Impact of family visit restrictions due to COVID-19 policy on patient outcomes: A cohort study.因 COVID-19 政策而实施的家属探访限制对患者结局的影响:一项队列研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):4042-4053. doi: 10.1111/jan.15325. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
Hospital performance comparison of inpatient fall rates; the impact of risk adjusting for patient-related factors: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.医院住院患者跌倒率的绩效比较;对患者相关因素进行风险调整的影响:一项多中心横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07638-7.
7
Which factors influence the prevalence of institution-acquired falls? Results from an international, multi-center, cross-sectional survey.哪些因素影响机构获得性跌倒的发生率?一项国际多中心横断面调查的结果。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022 Jul;54(4):462-469. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12758. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Pressure Relieving Support Surfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2): using photography for blinded central endpoint review.压力缓解支撑表面:一项随机评估 2(PRESSURE 2):使用摄影进行盲法中心结局评估。
Trials. 2021 Apr 28;22(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05262-0.
9
Assessing Nursing Homes Quality Indicators' Between-Provider Variability and Reliability: A Cross-Sectional Study Using ICCs and Rankability.评估养老院质量指标的提供者间变异性和可靠性:使用 ICC 和可排序性的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;17(24):9249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249249.
10
Dry skin and the use of leave-on products in nursing care: A prevalence study in nursing homes and hospitals.干性皮肤与护理中使用的免洗产品:养老院和医院的患病率研究。
Nurs Open. 2018 Sep 27;6(1):189-196. doi: 10.1002/nop2.204. eCollection 2019 Jan.