Bugedo G, Gonzalez J, Asenjo C, De la Cuadra J C, Gajardo A, Castillo L, Muñoz H, Dagnino J
Departamento de Anestesiología, Hospital Clínico Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):813-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.813.
We have performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the efficacy of ondansetron, droperidol, or both, in preventing postoperative emesis. We studied 242 patients undergoing biliary or gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia. Shortly before induction of anaesthesia, patients received: saline i.v. (group I, n = 62); droperidol 2.5 mg i.v. (group 2, n = 60); ondansetron 4 mg i.v. (group 3, n = 57); or droperidol 2.5 mg with ondansetron 4 mg i.v. (group 4, n = 63). Nausea occurred in 45%, 37%, 32% and 29% (P = 0.234) and vomiting in 23%, 17%, 9% and 5% (P = 0.016) of patients in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, during the first 24 h. Groups 2 and 4 had greater sedation scores than group 1 during the first 3 h (P < 0.01). We conclude that both droperidol and ondansetron showed a significant antiemetic effect, ondansetron was not significantly better than droperidol, and the combination of droperidol and ondansetron was better than droperidol but no better than ondansetron alone.
我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床研究,以评估昂丹司琼、氟哌利多或两者联合使用预防术后呕吐的疗效。我们研究了242例在全身麻醉下接受胆道或妇科手术的患者。在麻醉诱导前不久,患者接受:静脉注射生理盐水(第1组,n = 62);静脉注射2.5 mg氟哌利多(第2组,n = 60);静脉注射4 mg昂丹司琼(第3组,n = 57);或静脉注射2.5 mg氟哌利多与4 mg昂丹司琼(第4组,n = 63)。在最初24小时内,第1、2、3和4组患者恶心发生率分别为45%、37%、32%和29%(P = 0.234),呕吐发生率分别为23%、17%、9%和5%(P = 0.016)。在最初3小时内,第2组和第4组的镇静评分高于第1组(P < 0.01)。我们得出结论,氟哌利多和昂丹司琼均显示出显著的止吐作用,昂丹司琼并不显著优于氟哌利多,氟哌利多与昂丹司琼联合使用优于氟哌利多,但并不优于单独使用昂丹司琼。