Jacquemyn Y, Sys S U, Verdonk P
Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Edegem, Belgium.
Early Hum Dev. 2000 Jan;57(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00049-3.
The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in ultrasound-measured fetal biometry exist between pregnant woman of autochthonous Belgian origin and migrant women from Morocco and Turkey.
A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in which fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length were measured in pregnant women presenting between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation. Fetal weight was calculated using the formulae by Shepard and Hadlock. Only uncomplicated singleton pregnancies with a certain date of the last menstrual period, confirmed by early ultrasound, were included. The father of the child had to be of the same ethnic origin as the mother. Polynomial regression of the different measurements was performed for women of autochthonous Belgian origin and for migrant women from Morocco and from Turkey.
Singleton fetuses numbering 524 were examined, including 369 Belgian, 78 Moroccan and 77 Turkish. Polynomial regression was performed for the three groups for the biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight. No significant difference between the three different ethnic groups could be demonstrated for the biparietal diameter (P = 0.39). There was a significant difference for the head circumference (P = 0.017), the abdominal circumference (P = 0.0015), the femur length (P = 0.0014) and the estimated fetal weight for both formulae (Shepard P = 0.047; Hadlock P = 0.0006).
In this set of cross-sectional data no significant difference for ultrasound-measured fetal biparietal diameter between autochthonous Belgian women and migrant women from Morocco and from Turkey could be demonstrated. Differences do exist for the head circumference, the abdominal circumference, the femur length and the estimated fetal weight. The use of adapted charts of fetal size for pregnant women of Turkish or Moroccan origin should be considered.
本研究旨在确定比利时本地孕妇与来自摩洛哥和土耳其的移民孕妇在超声测量胎儿生物测量值方面是否存在差异。
进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,对妊娠18至40周的孕妇测量胎儿双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度。使用谢泼德和哈德洛克公式计算胎儿体重。仅纳入末次月经日期确定且经早期超声证实的单胎妊娠且无并发症的孕妇。孩子的父亲必须与母亲同属一个种族。对比利时本地孕妇以及来自摩洛哥和土耳其的移民孕妇进行不同测量值的多项式回归分析。
共检查了524名单胎胎儿,其中包括369名比利时胎儿胎儿、78名摩洛哥胎儿和77名土耳其胎儿。对三组胎儿的双顶径、头围、腹围、股骨长度和估计胎儿体重进行了多项式回归分析。三组之间双顶径无显著差异(P = 0.39)。头围(P = 0.017)、腹围(P = 0.0015)、股骨长度(P = 0.0014)以及两种公式计算的估计胎儿体重均存在显著差异(谢泼德公式P = 0.047;哈德洛克公式P = 0.0006)。
在这组横断面数据中,未发现比利时本地孕妇与来自摩洛哥和土耳其的移民孕妇在超声测量胎儿双顶径方面存在显著差异。但在头围、腹围、股骨长度和估计胎儿体重方面确实存在差异。应考虑为土耳其或摩洛哥裔孕妇使用适配的胎儿大小图表。