• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进性犯罪者的风险评估:三种精算量表的比较

Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.

作者信息

Hanson R K, Thornton D

机构信息

Offender Behaviour Programmes Unit, Her Majesty's Prison Service, London, England.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2000 Feb;24(1):119-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1005482921333.

DOI:10.1023/a:1005482921333
PMID:10693322
Abstract

The study compared the predictive accuracy of three sex offender risk-assessment measures: the RRASOR (Hanson, 1997), Thornton's SACJ-Min (Grubin, 1998), and a new scale, Static-99, created by combining the items from the RRASOR and SACJ-Min. Predictive accuracy was tested using four diverse datasets drawn from Canada and the United Kingdom (total n = 1301). The RRASOR and the SACJ-Min showed roughly equivalent predictive accuracy, and the combination of the two scales was more accurate than either original scale. Static-99 showed moderate predictive accuracy for both sexual recidivism (r = 0.33, ROC area = 0.71) and violent (including sexual) recidivism (r = 0.32, ROC area = 0.69). The variation in the predictive accuracy of Static-99 across the four samples was no more than would be expected by chance.

摘要

该研究比较了三种性犯罪者风险评估方法的预测准确性

RRASOR(汉森,1997年)、桑顿的SACJ-Min(格鲁宾,1998年),以及一个新量表Static-99,它是通过合并RRASOR和SACJ-Min的项目创建的。使用从加拿大和英国抽取的四个不同数据集(总计n = 1301)对预测准确性进行了测试。RRASOR和SACJ-Min显示出大致相当的预测准确性,并且两个量表的组合比任何一个原始量表都更准确。Static-99对性再犯(r = 0.33,ROC面积 = 0.71)和暴力(包括性)再犯(r = 0.32,ROC面积 = 0.69)均显示出中等的预测准确性。Static-99在四个样本中的预测准确性差异不超过偶然预期。

相似文献

1
Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.改进性犯罪者的风险评估:三种精算量表的比较
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Feb;24(1):119-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1005482921333.
2
Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.对再犯罪风险的无指导临床和精算评估:与丹麦性犯罪者的直接比较。
Sex Abuse. 2007 Jun;19(2):135-53. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900205. Epub 2007 May 30.
3
Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: a cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden.性犯罪者再犯风险的精算评估:瑞典RRASOR与Static-99的交叉验证
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Dec;25(6):629-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1012758307983.
4
A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.性犯罪者精算风险评估工具的多地点比较
Psychol Assess. 2003 Sep;15(3):413-25. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.413.
5
Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.精算风险评估在性犯罪者类型方面的预测效度差异。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2003 Aug;47(4):422-38. doi: 10.1177/0306624X03253850.
6
Comparing sex offender risk assessment measures on a UK sample.在一个英国样本上比较性犯罪者风险评估措施。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2004 Feb;48(1):7-27. doi: 10.1177/0306624X03257243.
7
Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.风险矩阵2000性与暴力量表的交叉验证。
J Interpers Violence. 2006 May;21(5):612-33. doi: 10.1177/0886260506286876.
8
Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?静态-99量表能否预测老年性犯罪者的再犯情况?
Sex Abuse. 2006 Oct;18(4):343-55. doi: 10.1177/107906320601800403.
9
Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.前瞻性精算风险评估:五种风险评估工具在不同性犯罪者亚型中的比较。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Apr;54(2):169-86. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08328755. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
10
Interpreting multiple risk scales for sex offenders: evidence for averaging.解读性犯罪者的多种风险量表:平均化的证据。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1037/a0033098. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Validity of the SAPROF-SO for Success on Supervised Release From a Secure Treatment Center.SAPROF-SO对从安全治疗中心监督释放成功的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2025 Oct;37(7):759-786. doi: 10.1177/10790632251328958. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
2
'Any male victim?' The legacy of conflating paedophilia and homosexuality and the differential seriousness of sexual abuse by victim gender.“有男性受害者吗?”将恋童癖与同性恋混为一谈的遗留问题以及按受害者性别区分的性虐待不同严重程度
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 16;32(1):106-120. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2280519. eCollection 2025.
3
Sex Offender Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned From Over 70 Years of Research.
性犯罪者再犯:从70多年的研究中汲取的一些经验教训。
Crim Justice Rev. 2024 Dec;49(4):413-452. doi: 10.1177/07340168231157385. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Comparison of risk of recidivism among sexual offenders with and without sexual preference disorders using the STATIC-99R instrument.使用STATIC-99R工具比较有和没有性偏好障碍的性犯罪者的再犯风险。
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2024 Mar;33(1):9-17. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2024.135261. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
The impact of testosterone-lowering medication on recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.降低睾丸激素药物对性犯罪者再犯率的影响。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2024;26(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2024.2359923. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
6
Forensic Aftercare Facilities and Their Impact on the Releasability of Persons Who Committed Sexual Offenses: A Three Group Comparison.法医后续照护机构及其对性犯罪者可释放性的影响:三组比较
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Aug;69(10-11):1487-1503. doi: 10.1177/0306624X241246519. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
7
Cross-Cultural Validity of Sexual Recidivism Risk Assessments Using Static-99R, STABLE-2007, and the VRS-SO.使用静态-99R、STABLE-2007 和 VRS-SO 进行性累犯风险评估的跨文化有效性。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Feb;26(2):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01480-2. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Violence risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.法医精神科人群的暴力风险评估工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;10(10):780-789. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00256-0.
9
Development of a risk assessment tool for Japanese sex offenders: The Japanese Static-99.日本性犯罪者风险评估工具的开发:日本静态-99。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2023 Dec;43(4):496-504. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12330. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
The Predictive Validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2).修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Aug;35(5):649-663. doi: 10.1177/10790632221149696. Epub 2023 Feb 2.