Spencer N, Newell R
Leeds General Infirmary, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Jul;19(5):347-56. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0373.
The UKCC (1995) suggest that in order for nurses to maintain their registration, they must maintain a personal professional profile via reflection, and there are numerous approaches to the teaching of reflection. Similarly, several models of reflection exist. However, much of this activity has occurred without attempts to establish the effectiveness of either reflection or attempts to teach it. The current study attempted to examine whether written educational material could significantly improve nurses' reflective ability. Nineteen practising nurses were recruited from a variety of sources and offered an educational package, largely based on Boud et al. (1985) model of reflection in learning. In a repeated measures design study, these participants completed a reflective exercise before and after offering of the educational material. Their scripts were rated, using Wong et al.'s (1995) tool, by three raters, two of whom were unaware of whether the scripts were completed before or after offering of the educational material. An initial analysis showed that there were no statistically significant changes in subjects' reflective ability following education. However, removal from the analysis of 6 participants who had a pre-test ability at the highest possible level (and for whom no improvement was, therefore, possible) resulted in a significant improvement in participants' ability from pre- to post-test (z = -2.4450, P = 0.0145). Interrater reliability calculated using Cronbach's Alpha was 0.7210 for pretest reflective accounts and 0.7369 for post-test reflective accounts.
英国中央护理、助产与健康访视委员会(1995)指出,护士若要维持其注册资格,必须通过反思来保持个人专业形象,且反思教学有多种方法。同样,也存在几种反思模式。然而,此类活动大多进行时并未尝试确定反思本身或反思教学的有效性。本研究试图检验书面教育材料是否能显著提高护士的反思能力。从多个渠道招募了19名在职护士,并为其提供了一套主要基于博德等人(1985)学习反思模式的教育材料。在一项重复测量设计研究中,这些参与者在提供教育材料之前和之后完成了一项反思练习。他们的文稿由三名评分者使用王等人(1995)的工具进行评分,其中两名评分者不知道文稿是在提供教育材料之前还是之后完成的。初步分析表明,教育后受试者的反思能力没有统计学上的显著变化。然而,在分析中剔除6名预测试能力处于最高水平(因此不可能有提高)的参与者后,参与者从测试前到测试后的能力有了显著提高(z = -2.4450,P = 0.0145)。使用克朗巴赫α系数计算的评分者间信度,预测试反思记录为0.7210,后测试反思记录为0.7369。