Suppr超能文献

腔内高剂量率近距离放射疗法在上呼吸道中央型肿瘤中的疗效与毒性

Effect and toxicity of endoluminal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in centrally located tumors of the upper respiratory tract.

作者信息

Harms W, Schraube P, Becker H, Latz D, Herth F, Fritz P, Wannenmacher M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Radiation Therapy, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2000 Feb;176(2):60-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00002329.

Abstract

AIM

To assess effect and toxicity of high-dose-rate afterloading (HDR) alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in centrally located tumors of the upper respiratory tract.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1987 to 1996, 55 patients were treated. Twenty-one patients (group A1: 17 non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], A2: 4 metastases from other malignancies) were treated using HDR alone due to a relapse after external beam irradiation. In 34 previously untreated and inoperable patients (group B1: 27 NSCLC, B2: 7 metastases from other malignancies) HDR was given as a boost after EBRT (30 to 60 Gy, median 50). HDR was carried out with a 192Ir source (370 GBq). The brachytherapy dose (group A: 5 to 27 Gy, median 20; B: 10 to 20 Gy, median 15) was prescribed to 1 cm distance from the source axis. A distanciable applicator was used in 39/55 patients.

RESULTS

In group A1, a response rate (CR, PR) of 53% (group B1: 77%) was reached. The median survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 5 months in group A1 (B1: 20 months). The 1-, 3- and 5-year local progression free survival rates (Kaplan-Meier) were 66% (15%), 52% (0%), and 37% (0%) in group B1 (group A1). Prognostic favorable factors in group B1 were a tumor diameter < 20 mm, the lack of radiological mediastinal involvement, a complete remission, and a Karnofsky performance status > 70. Grade-1 or 2 toxicity (RTOG/EORTC) occurred in 0% in group A and in 6% in group B. We observed no Grade-3 or 4 toxicity. Complications caused by persistent or progressive local disease occurred in 3 patients in group A (fatal hemorrhage, tracheomediastinal fistula, hemoptysis) and in 2 patients in group B (fatal hemorrhage, hemoptysis).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment with moderate side effects. In combination with external beam irradiation long-term remissions can be reached in one third of the patients.

摘要

目的

评估高剂量率后装治疗(HDR)单独应用或联合外照射放疗(EBRT)治疗上呼吸道中央型肿瘤的疗效及毒性。

患者与方法

1987年至1996年,共治疗55例患者。21例患者(A1组:17例非小细胞肺癌[NSCLC],A2组:4例其他恶性肿瘤转移灶)因外照射后复发,仅接受HDR治疗。34例既往未治疗且无法手术的患者(B1组:27例NSCLC,B2组:7例其他恶性肿瘤转移灶)在EBRT(30至60 Gy,中位剂量50 Gy)后给予HDR作为追加剂量。采用192Ir源(370 GBq)进行HDR治疗。近距离放疗剂量(A组:5至27 Gy,中位剂量20 Gy;B组:10至20 Gy,中位剂量15 Gy)规定为距源轴1 cm处的剂量。55例患者中有39例使用了可分离式施源器。

结果

A1组的缓解率(CR,PR)为53%(B1组:77%)。A1组的中位生存期(Kaplan-Meier法)为5个月(B1组:20个月)。B1组(A1组)的1年、3年和5年局部无进展生存率(Kaplan-Meier法)分别为66%(15%)、52%(0%)和37%(0%)。B1组的预后有利因素为肿瘤直径<20 mm、无放射学纵隔受累、完全缓解以及卡氏评分>70。A组0%的患者出现1级或2级毒性反应(RTOG/EORTC标准),B组为6%。未观察到3级或4级毒性反应。A组有3例患者(致命性出血、气管纵隔瘘、咯血)以及B组有2例患者(致命性出血、咯血)出现由持续性或进行性局部病变引起的并发症。

结论

HDR近距离放疗是一种有效的治疗方法,副作用较轻。联合外照射放疗,三分之一的患者可实现长期缓解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验