Theunissen F E, Sen K, Doupe A J
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1650, USA.
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):2315-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-06-02315.2000.
The stimulus-response function of many visual and auditory neurons has been described by a spatial-temporal receptive field (STRF), a linear model that for mathematical reasons has until recently been estimated with the reverse correlation method, using simple stimulus ensembles such as white noise. Such stimuli, however, often do not effectively activate high-level sensory neurons, which may be optimized to analyze natural sounds and images. We show that it is possible to overcome the simple-stimulus limitation and then use this approach to calculate the STRFs of avian auditory forebrain neurons from an ensemble of birdsongs. We find that in many cases the STRFs derived using natural sounds are strikingly different from the STRFs that we obtained using an ensemble of random tone pips. When we compare these two models by assessing their predictions of neural response to the actual data, we find that the STRFs obtained from natural sounds are superior. Our results show that the STRF model is an incomplete description of response properties of nonlinear auditory neurons, but that linear receptive fields are still useful models for understanding higher level sensory processing, as long as the STRFs are estimated from the responses to relevant complex stimuli.
许多视觉和听觉神经元的刺激-反应功能已通过时空感受野(STRF)来描述,STRF是一种线性模型,由于数学原因,直到最近一直使用反向相关方法,利用白噪声等简单刺激集合进行估计。然而,此类刺激通常无法有效激活高级感觉神经元,而高级感觉神经元可能经过优化以分析自然声音和图像。我们表明,有可能克服简单刺激的局限性,然后使用这种方法从一组鸟鸣声中计算鸟类听觉前脑神经元的STRF。我们发现,在许多情况下,使用自然声音得出的STRF与使用随机音调脉冲集合获得的STRF显著不同。当我们通过评估这两种模型对实际数据的神经反应预测来进行比较时,我们发现从自然声音中获得的STRF更优。我们的结果表明,STRF模型对非线性听觉神经元的反应特性描述并不完整,但只要从对相关复杂刺激的反应中估计STRF,线性感受野仍是理解高级感觉处理的有用模型。