Cai D, DeAngelis G C, Freeman R D
Group in Vision Science, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720-2020, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;78(2):1045-61. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.1045.
We have studied the spatiotemporal receptive-field organization of 144 neurons recorded from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of adult cats and kittens at 4 and 8 wk postnatal. Receptive-field profiles were obtained with the use of a reverse correlation technique, in which we compute the cross-correlation between the action potential train of a neuron and a randomized sequence of long bright and dark bar stimuli that are flashed throughout the receptive field. Spatiotemporal receptive-field profiles of LGN neurons generally exhibit a biphasic temporal response, as well as the classical center-surround spatial organization. For nonlagged cells, the first temporal phase of the response dominates, whereas for lagged neurons, the second temporal phase of the response is typically the largest. This temporal phase difference between lagged and nonlagged cells accounts for their divergent behavior in response to flashed stimuli. Most LGN cells exhibit some degree of space-time inseparability, which means that the receptive field cannot simply be viewed as the product of a spatial waveform and a temporal waveform. In these cases, the response of the surround is typically delayed relative to that of the center, and there is some blending of center and surround during the time course of the response. We demonstrate that a simple extension of the traditional difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) model, in which the surround response is delayed relative to that of the center, accounts nicely for these findings. With regard to development, our analysis shows that spatial and temporal aspects of receptive field structure mature with markedly different time courses. After 4 wk postnatal, there is little change in the spatial organization of LGN receptive fields, with the exception of a weak, but significant, trend for the surround to become smaller and stronger with age. In contrast, there are substantial changes in temporal receptive-field structure after 4 wk postnatal. From 4 to 8 wk postnatal, the shape of the temporal response profile changes, becoming more biphasic, but the latency and duration of the response remain unchanged. From 8 wk postnatal to adulthood, the shape of the temporal profile remains approximately constant, but there is a dramatic decline in both the latency and duration of the response. Comparison of our results with recent data from cortical (area 17) simple cells reveals that the temporal development of LGN cells accounts for a substantial portion of the temporal maturation of simple cells.
我们研究了从出生后4周和8周的成年猫和小猫的背外侧膝状核(dLGN)记录的144个神经元的时空感受野组织。使用反向相关技术获得感受野轮廓,即我们计算神经元的动作电位序列与在整个感受野中闪烁的长亮暗条刺激的随机序列之间的互相关。LGN神经元的时空感受野轮廓通常表现出双相时间响应以及经典的中心-外周空间组织。对于非滞后细胞,响应的第一个时间阶段占主导,而对于滞后神经元,响应的第二个时间阶段通常最大。滞后和非滞后细胞之间的这种时间阶段差异解释了它们对闪烁刺激的不同反应行为。大多数LGN细胞表现出一定程度的时空不可分离性,这意味着感受野不能简单地被视为空间波形和时间波形的乘积。在这些情况下,外周的响应通常相对于中心延迟,并且在响应的时间过程中中心和外周存在一些混合。我们证明,传统高斯差分(DOG)模型的简单扩展,即外周响应相对于中心延迟,很好地解释了这些发现。关于发育,我们的分析表明,感受野结构的空间和时间方面在明显不同的时间进程中成熟。出生后4周后,LGN感受野的空间组织几乎没有变化,除了外周随年龄增长有微弱但显著的变小变强趋势。相比之下,出生后4周后时间感受野结构有实质性变化。从出生后4周到8周,时间响应轮廓的形状发生变化,变得更加双相,但响应的潜伏期和持续时间保持不变。从出生后8周到成年,时间轮廓的形状大致保持不变,但响应的潜伏期和持续时间都急剧下降。将我们的结果与来自皮质(17区)简单细胞的最新数据进行比较表明,LGN细胞的时间发育占简单细胞时间成熟的很大一部分。