Strawbridge W J, Wallhagen M I, Shema S J
Human Population Laboratory, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA 94704-1011, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Mar;90(3):340-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.340.
The purpose of this study was to assess the justification, on the basis of mortality, of the new National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines on obesity and overweight and to discuss the health implications of declaring all adults with a body mass index of 25 through 29 "overweight."
The relationships between NHLBI body mass index categories and mortality for individuals older than 31 years were analyzed for 6253 Alameda County Study respondents aged 21 through 75 years. Time-dependent proportional hazards models were used to adjust for changes in risk factors and weight during follow-up.
Adjusted relative risks of mortality for 4 NHLBI categories compared with the category "normal" indicated that only being underweight or moderately/extremely obese were associated with higher mortality. Specific risk varied significantly by sex.
Our results are consistent with other studies and fail to justify lowering the overweight threshold on the basis of mortality. Current interpretations of the revised guidelines stigmatize too many people as overweight; fail to account for sex, race/ethnicity, age, and other differences; and ignore the serious health risks associated with low weight and efforts to maintain an unrealistically lean body mass.
本研究旨在根据死亡率评估美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)关于肥胖和超重的新指南的合理性,并讨论将所有体重指数(BMI)在25至29之间的成年人宣布为“超重”对健康的影响。
对阿拉米达县研究中6253名年龄在21至75岁之间的受访者进行分析,研究NHLBI的BMI类别与31岁以上个体死亡率之间的关系。使用时间依存比例风险模型对随访期间风险因素和体重的变化进行调整。
与“正常”类别相比,4种NHLBI类别调整后的死亡相对风险表明,只有体重过轻或中度/极度肥胖与较高死亡率相关。具体风险因性别而异。
我们的结果与其他研究一致,无法依据死亡率来证明降低超重阈值的合理性。对修订后指南的当前解读将太多人污名化为超重;未考虑性别、种族/族裔、年龄和其他差异;并且忽视了与低体重相关的严重健康风险以及维持不切实际的低体重的努力。