Wing S, Wolf S
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-2089, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):233-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108233.
People who live near industrial swine operations have reported decreased health and quality of life. To investigate these issues, we surveyed residents of three rural communities, one in the vicinity of an approximately 6,000-head hog operation, one in the vicinity of two intensive cattle operations, and a third rural agricultural area without livestock operations that use liquid waste management systems. Trained interviewers obtained information about health symptoms and reduced quality of life during the previous 6 months. We completed 155 interviews, with a refusal rate of 14%. Community differences in the mean number of episodes were compared with adjustment for age, sex, smoking, and employment status. The average number of episodes of many symptoms was similar in the three communities; however, certain respiratory and gastrointestinal problems and mucous membrane irritation were elevated among residents in the vicinity of the hog operation. Residents in the vicinity of the hog operation reported increased occurrences of headaches, runny nose, sore throat, excessive coughing, diarrhea, and burning eyes as compared to residents of the community with no intensive livestock operations. Quality of life, as indicated by the number of times residents could not open their windows or go outside even in nice weather, was similar in the control and the community in the vicinity of the cattle operation but greatly reduced among residents near the hog operation. Respiratory and mucous membrane effects were consistent with the results of studies of occupational exposures among swine confinement-house workers and previous findings for neighbors of intensive swine operations. Long-term physical and mental health impacts could not be investigated in this study.
居住在工业化养猪场附近的居民反映健康状况和生活质量有所下降。为了调查这些问题,我们对三个农村社区的居民进行了调查,其中一个社区靠近一个约有6000头猪的养殖场,一个社区靠近两个集约化养牛场,第三个农村农业区没有使用液体废物管理系统的畜牧场。训练有素的访员收集了过去6个月内健康症状和生活质量下降方面的信息。我们完成了155次访谈,拒绝率为14%。对各社区发作次数的平均值差异进行了比较,并对年龄、性别、吸烟和就业状况进行了调整。三个社区中许多症状的发作平均次数相似;然而,在养猪场附近的居民中,某些呼吸道和胃肠道问题以及粘膜刺激症状有所增加。与没有集约化畜牧场的社区居民相比,养猪场附近的居民报告头痛、流鼻涕、喉咙痛、咳嗽过多、腹泻和眼睛灼痛的发生率增加。根据居民即使在天气好的时候也无法开窗或外出的次数来衡量,生活质量在对照社区和养牛场附近的社区相似,但在养猪场附近的居民中大幅下降。呼吸道和粘膜影响与养猪场工人职业暴露研究结果以及集约化养猪场附近居民的先前研究结果一致。本研究无法调查长期的身心健康影响。