• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会判断中的聚光灯效应:对自身行为和外表显著性估计中的自我中心偏差。

The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance.

作者信息

Gilovich T, Medvec V H, Savitsky K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):211-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.211.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.211
PMID:10707330
Abstract

This research provides evidence that people overestimate the extent to which their actions and appearance are noted by others, a phenomenon dubbed the spotlight effect. In Studies 1 and 2, participants who were asked to don a T-shirt depicting either a flattering or potentially embarrassing image overestimated the number of observers who would be able to recall what was pictured on the shirt. In Study 3, participants in a group discussion overestimated how prominent their positive and negative utterances were to their fellow discussants. Studies 4 and 5 provide evidence supporting an anchoring-and-adjustment interpretation of the spotlight effect. In particular, people appear to anchor on their own rich phenomenological experience and then adjust--insufficiently--to take into account the perspective of others. The discussion focuses on the manifestations and implications of the spotlight effect across a host of everyday social phenomena.

摘要

这项研究提供了证据,表明人们高估了他人对自己行为和外表的关注程度,这一现象被称为聚光灯效应。在研究1和研究2中,被要求穿上印有讨人喜欢或可能令人尴尬形象的T恤的参与者,高估了能够回忆起T恤上图案的观察者数量。在研究3中,小组讨论中的参与者高估了他们的积极和消极言论对其他讨论者的突出程度。研究4和研究5提供了支持对聚光灯效应进行锚定和调整解释的证据。具体而言,人们似乎以自己丰富的现象学体验为锚点,然后进行——但调整不足——以考虑他人的视角。讨论聚焦于聚光灯效应在一系列日常社会现象中的表现及其影响。

相似文献

1
The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance.社会判断中的聚光灯效应:对自身行为和外表显著性估计中的自我中心偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):211-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.211.
2
The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency in social anxiety.社交焦虑中的聚光灯效应与透明度错觉。
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(6):804-19. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.11.006. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
3
Noticing Future Me: Reducing Egocentrism Through Mental Imagery.关注未来的自己:通过心理意象减少自我中心主义。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul;42(7):855-63. doi: 10.1177/0146167216644961. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Empathy neglect: reconciling the spotlight effect and the correspondence bias.共情忽视:调和聚光灯效应与对应偏差
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):300-12. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.300.
5
The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.透明度错觉:对他人解读自身情绪状态能力的偏差评估。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Aug;75(2):332-46. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332.
6
Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences.社会推理中的锚定和调整。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):151-62. doi: 10.1037/a0028232. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
7
The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.真正的错误共识效应:社会认知中一种无法根除的自我中心偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):596-610. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596.
8
Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation.冲突与谈判中公平的文化及自我中心认知
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Oct;87(5):833-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.833.
9
Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others.旁观者眼中的客观性:对自身与他人偏见的不同认知。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):781-99. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781.
10
Gender identity: a multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment.性别认同:一项对心理社会适应有影响的多维度分析。
Dev Psychol. 2001 Jul;37(4):451-63. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.4.451.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting cognitive biases to improve social cognition and social emotional health.针对认知偏差以改善社会认知和社会情绪健康。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1534125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534125. eCollection 2025.
2
Measuring behavioral responses to a social stressor: Does the Social Performance Rating Scale have utility beyond social anxiety disorder?测量对社会应激源的行为反应:社会表现评定量表在社交焦虑障碍之外是否有用?
Behav Res Ther. 2025 Mar;186:104700. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104700. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
The first-to-test bias: Impact of testing order on assigning responsibility for contagion.
先测者偏见:测试顺序对传染病责任分配的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0297965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297965. eCollection 2024.
4
The association between working memory, teacher-student relationship, and academic performance in primary school children.小学生工作记忆、师生关系与学业成绩之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1240741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240741. eCollection 2023.
5
All it takes is empathy: how virtual reality perspective-taking influences intergroup attitudes and stereotypes.所需的只是同理心:虚拟现实视角采择如何影响群体间态度和刻板印象。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1265284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265284. eCollection 2023.
6
Egocentric Projection is a Rational Strategy for Accurate Emotion Prediction.自我中心投射是准确情绪预测的一种合理策略。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;109. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104521. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
7
The Disproportionate Impact of Fear of Negative Evaluation on First-Generation College Students, LGBTQ+ Students, and Students with Disabilities in College Science Courses.恐惧负面评价对大学理科课程中第一代大学生、LGBTQ+学生和残疾学生的不成比例影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Sep;22(3):ar31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-10-0195.
8
Biases in object location estimation: The role of rotations and translation.物体位置估计中的偏差:旋转和平移的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2307-2320. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02716-2. Epub 2023 May 31.
9
Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases.走向偏见研究的简约化:一套偏见的信念一致信息处理的通用框架
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1464-1487. doi: 10.1177/17456916221148147. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
10
The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments.道德品性判断中喜欢偏差的边界条件。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22147-7.