• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真正的错误共识效应:社会认知中一种无法根除的自我中心偏差。

The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.

作者信息

Krueger J, Clement R W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):596-610. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596
PMID:7965607
Abstract

Consensus bias is the overuse of self-related knowledge in estimating the prevalence of attributes in a population. The bias seems statistically appropriate (Dawes, 1989), but according to the egocentrism hypothesis, it merely mimics normative inductive reasoning. In Experiment 1, Ss made population estimates for agreement with each of 40 personality inventory statements. Even Ss who had been educated about the consensus bias, or had received feedback about actual consensus, or both showed the bias. In Experiment 2, Ss attributed bias to another person, but their own consensus estimates were more affected by their own response to the item than by the other person's response. In Experiment 3, there was bias even in the presence of unanimous information from 20 randomly chosen others. In all 3 experiments, Ss continued to show consensus bias despite the availability of other statistical information.

摘要

共识偏差是指在估计总体中属性的流行程度时过度使用与自我相关的知识。这种偏差在统计学上似乎是合理的(道斯,1989),但根据自我中心主义假说,它只是模仿了规范性归纳推理。在实验1中,被试对40条人格量表陈述中的每一条的认同程度进行总体估计。即使是那些已经了解共识偏差、或收到关于实际共识的反馈、或两者都有的被试,也表现出了这种偏差。在实验2中,被试将偏差归因于另一个人,但他们自己的共识估计更多地受到自己对项目的回答的影响,而不是另一个人的回答的影响。在实验3中,即使有来自20个随机选择的其他人的一致信息,仍然存在偏差。在所有这3个实验中,尽管有其他统计信息可用,被试仍然表现出共识偏差。

相似文献

1
The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.真正的错误共识效应:社会认知中一种无法根除的自我中心偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):596-610. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596.
2
Egocentric pattern projection: how implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self.自我中心模式投射:内隐人格理论如何重现自我的版图。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0015670.
3
Causal trait theories: a new form of person knowledge that explains egocentric pattern projection.因果特质理论:一种解释自我中心模式投射的新型个人知识形式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):400-16. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000019. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
4
The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus.自我参照信息在社会共识认知中的首要地位。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;39 ( Pt 2):279-99. doi: 10.1348/014466600164471.
5
Diminishing adult egocentrism when estimating what others know.当估计他人所知时,成人自我中心会减少。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):473-86. doi: 10.1037/a0028883. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
6
Disconfirmation modulates the neural correlates of the false consensus effect: A parametric modulation approach.否定性确认调节虚假共识效应的神经相关:参数调制方法。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Dec;121:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
7
Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.社会推理策略:属性流行率估计中投射与刻板印象的相似性权变模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):573-85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573.
8
Egocentric bias across mental and non-mental representations in the Sandbox Task.沙盒任务中跨心理和非心理表征的自我中心偏差。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2395-2410. doi: 10.1177/1747021817742367. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
9
I'm like you and you're like me: social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence.我和你一样,你和我一样:社会投射和自我刻板印象都有助于解释自我与他人的一致性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;104(3):444-56. doi: 10.1037/a0031017. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
10
The self and social judgment: effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.自我与社会判断:情感反应和“自身立场”对关于他人的明确和模糊信息判断的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;61(6):884-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.884.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-other generalisation shapes social interaction and is disrupted in borderline personality disorder.自我-他人泛化塑造社会互动,并在边缘型人格障碍中受到破坏。
Elife. 2025 Jul 14;14:RP104008. doi: 10.7554/eLife.104008.
2
Divergence between predicted and actual perception of climate information.气候信息预测与实际认知之间的差异。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Mar 18;4(3):pgaf084. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf084. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Know Thyself, Improve Thyself: Personalized LLMs for Self-Knowledge and Moral Enhancement.认识你自己,提升你自己:个性化的大语言模型,用于自我认知和道德提升。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Nov 21;30(6):54. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00518-9.
4
Individual differences in emotion prediction and implications for social success.个体在情绪预测方面的差异及其对社交成功的影响。
Emotion. 2024 Oct;24(7):1697-1708. doi: 10.1037/emo0001386. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Ethics of Nudging in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Necessary Return to the Principles of Shared Decision Making: A Critical Review.新冠疫情危机中助推的伦理问题以及回归共同决策原则的必要性:批判性综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 10;16(4):e57960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57960. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Modeling opinion misperception and the emergence of silence in online social system.在线社交系统中意见误解和沉默的出现模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0296075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296075. eCollection 2024.
7
Mapping the Cognitive Biases Related to Vaccination: A Scoping Review of the Literature.绘制与疫苗接种相关的认知偏差:文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 11;11(12):1837. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121837.
8
Default egocentrism: an MVPA approach to overlap in own and others' socio-political attitudes.默认的自我中心主义:一种 MVPA 方法,用于研究自己和他人社会政治态度的重叠。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Jun 20;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad028.
9
Associations between Perceived Social Eating Norms and Initiation and Maintenance of Changes in Dietary Habits during the First COVID-19 Lockdown in France.法国首次新冠疫情封锁期间,感知到的社交饮食规范与饮食习惯变化的起始及维持之间的关联。
Foods. 2021 Nov 9;10(11):2745. doi: 10.3390/foods10112745.
10
Vaccine hesitancy: evidence from an adverse events following immunization database, and the role of cognitive biases.疫苗犹豫:来自疫苗不良反应监测数据库的证据,以及认知偏差的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1686. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11745-1.