Suppr超能文献

欧洲职业医学培训要求:一项德尔菲研究。

Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Macdonald E B, Ritchie K A, Murray K J, Gilmour W H

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):98-105. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.98.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the common core competencies required for occupational physicians in Europe.

METHOD

A modified Delphi survey was conducted among members of the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM), the Occupational Medicine Section of the Union of European Medical Specialities (UEMS), and of the European Network of Societies of Occupational Physicians (ENSOP). An initial questionnaire based on the training syllabus of the United Kingdom Faculty of Occupational Medicine was circulated and respondents were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results were discussed at a conference on the subject of competencies. A further questionnaire was developed and circulated which asked respondents to rank items within each section.

RESULTS

There was a 74% response in the first round and an 80% response in the second. Respondents' ratings from most important to least important were; occupational hazards to health, research methods, health promotion, occupational health law and ethics, communications, assessment of disability, environmental medicine, and management. In the second round, among those topics ranked most highly were; hazards to health and the illnesses which they cause, control of risks, and diagnoses of work related ill health. Topics such as principles of occupational safety and selection of personal protection equipment were of least importance. Although the assessment of fitness was regarded as important, monitoring and advising on sickness absence were not highly rated. Management competency was regarded as of low importance.

CONCLUSION

This survey identified that respondents had traditional disease focused views of the competencies required of occupational physicians and that competencies were lagging behind the evolving definition of occupational health.

摘要

目标

确定欧洲职业医师所需的核心共同能力。

方法

对欧洲职业医学学校协会(EASOM)、欧洲医学专业联盟职业医学分会(UEMS)以及欧洲职业医师协会网络(ENSOP)的成员进行了改良德尔菲调查。基于英国职业医学学院培训大纲的初始问卷被分发,要求受访者对每个项目的重要性进行评分。在一次关于能力主题的会议上对结果进行了讨论。随后制定并分发了进一步的问卷,要求受访者对每个部分的项目进行排序。

结果

第一轮的回复率为74%,第二轮为80%。受访者从最重要到最不重要的评分依次为:职业健康危害、研究方法、健康促进、职业健康法律与伦理、沟通、残疾评估、环境医学和管理。在第二轮中,排名最高的主题包括:健康危害及其导致的疾病、风险控制以及与工作相关的健康不良诊断。诸如职业安全原则和个人防护设备选择等主题最不重要。尽管健康评估被认为很重要,但对病假的监测和建议得分不高。管理能力被认为重要性较低。

结论

本次调查表明,受访者对职业医师所需能力持有传统的以疾病为重点的观点,且这些能力落后于职业健康不断演变的定义。

相似文献

1
Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):98-105. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.98.
2
Required competencies of occupational physicians: a Delphi survey of UK customers.
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;62(6):406-13. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.017061.
3
International perspective on common core competencies for occupational physicians: a modified Delphi study.
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;73(7):452-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103285. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Consensus on the competencies required for public health nutrition workforce development in Europe - the JobNut project.
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1439-49. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000625. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Crosscutting competencies for occupational health and safety professionals.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):235-43. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200505000-00009.
10
Comparison of competency priorities between UK occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.
Occup Environ Med. 2017 May;74(5):384-386. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104049. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

3
Development of a breast cancer case management information platform (BC-CMIP) module based on patient-perceived value.
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;12:1034171. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1034171. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors that influence occupational physicians' decision to issue an employer warning in Japan.
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12147. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12147.
6
Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study.
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;75(11):830-836. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105114. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
8
Perception of and attitude toward ethical issues among Korean occupational physicians.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun 24;29:23. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0182-z. eCollection 2017.
9
Comparison of competency priorities between UK occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.
Occup Environ Med. 2017 May;74(5):384-386. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104049. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
International perspective on common core competencies for occupational physicians: a modified Delphi study.
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;73(7):452-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103285. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Priorities in occupational health research: a Delphi study in The Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jul;54(7):504-10. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.7.504.
2
Occupational and environmental medicine in the United Kingdom.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1996;68(2):69-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00381237.
5
Audit and quality in occupational health.
Occup Med (Lond). 1992 Feb;42(1):7-11. doi: 10.1093/occmed/42.1.7.
6
Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1977;2(3):388-410. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2-3-388.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验