• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.欧洲职业医学培训要求:一项德尔菲研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):98-105. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.98.
2
Required competencies of occupational physicians: a Delphi survey of UK customers.职业医师的必备能力:对英国客户的德尔菲调查
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;62(6):406-13. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.017061.
3
International perspective on common core competencies for occupational physicians: a modified Delphi study.职业医师核心能力的国际视角:一项改良德尔菲研究
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;73(7):452-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103285. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
The competences postulated as requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe as viewed by Polish specialists.波兰专家眼中欧洲职业医学培训所需具备的能力要求。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14(1):63-9.
5
Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe postulated by Polish professionals.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(3):255-65.
6
[Attitudes of Polish occupational medicine physicians towards a proposal of requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe].[波兰职业医学医生对欧洲职业医学培训要求提案的态度]
Med Pr. 1998;49(5):423-38.
7
Surveys on the competencies of specialist occupational physicians and effective methods for acquisition of competencies in Japan.日本专科职业医师能力调查及能力获取的有效方法
J Occup Health. 2015;57(2):126-41. doi: 10.1539/joh.14-0162-OA. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
8
Consensus on the competencies required for public health nutrition workforce development in Europe - the JobNut project.欧洲公共卫生营养劳动力发展所需能力的共识——JobNut 项目。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1439-49. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000625. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Crosscutting competencies for occupational health and safety professionals.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):235-43. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200505000-00009.
10
Comparison of competency priorities between UK occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.英国职业医师与职业健康护士之间胜任力优先级的比较。
Occup Environ Med. 2017 May;74(5):384-386. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104049. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of occupational physicians in supporting transgender and gender-diverse people (returning) at work - a focus group study: .职业医生对支持跨性别和性别多样化人群(重返)工作的看法——一项焦点小组研究:
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e083604. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083604.
2
Development of a tool for assessing the clinical competency of Chinese master's nursing students based on the mini-CEX: a Delphi method study.基于迷你临床演练评估的中国硕士护理学生临床能力评估工具的开发:德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e078719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078719.
3
Development of a breast cancer case management information platform (BC-CMIP) module based on patient-perceived value.基于患者感知价值的乳腺癌病例管理信息平台(BC-CMIP)模块的开发
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;12:1034171. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1034171. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess symptoms of post-stroke depression in stroke patients at the rehabilitation stage.一种用于评估康复期中风患者中风后抑郁症状的临床测量方法的开发与初步验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:928257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928257. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors that influence occupational physicians' decision to issue an employer warning in Japan.影响日本职业医生发布雇主警告决定的因素。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12147. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12147.
6
Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study.英国职业医师和职业健康研究人员的当前研究重点:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;75(11):830-836. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105114. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
7
Differences in opinions of occupational physicians on the required competencies by field of practice: results of an international Delphi study.不同实践领域的职业医生对所需能力的意见差异:一项国际德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1139-9.
8
Perception of and attitude toward ethical issues among Korean occupational physicians.韩国职业医师对伦理问题的认知与态度
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun 24;29:23. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0182-z. eCollection 2017.
9
Comparison of competency priorities between UK occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.英国职业医师与职业健康护士之间胜任力优先级的比较。
Occup Environ Med. 2017 May;74(5):384-386. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104049. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
International perspective on common core competencies for occupational physicians: a modified Delphi study.职业医师核心能力的国际视角:一项改良德尔菲研究
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;73(7):452-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103285. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Priorities in occupational health research: a Delphi study in The Netherlands.职业健康研究的优先事项:荷兰的一项德尔菲研究。
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jul;54(7):504-10. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.7.504.
2
Occupational and environmental medicine in the United Kingdom.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1996;68(2):69-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00381237.
3
Priorities for understanding and managing occupational allergy: a Delphi consensus.理解和管理职业性过敏的优先事项:德尔菲共识
Clin Exp Allergy. 1993 Aug;23(8):634-7.
4
Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey of United Kingdom medical opinion by the Delphi technique.职业医学的研究重点:运用德尔菲技术对英国医学观点进行的一项调查。
Occup Environ Med. 1994 May;51(5):289-94. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.5.289.
5
Audit and quality in occupational health.
Occup Med (Lond). 1992 Feb;42(1):7-11. doi: 10.1093/occmed/42.1.7.
6
Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities.面向决策者的卫生服务研究:运用德尔菲法确定卫生工作重点
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1977;2(3):388-410. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2-3-388.

欧洲职业医学培训要求:一项德尔菲研究。

Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Macdonald E B, Ritchie K A, Murray K J, Gilmour W H

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):98-105. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.98.

DOI:10.1136/oem.57.2.98
PMID:10711277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1739906/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the common core competencies required for occupational physicians in Europe.

METHOD

A modified Delphi survey was conducted among members of the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM), the Occupational Medicine Section of the Union of European Medical Specialities (UEMS), and of the European Network of Societies of Occupational Physicians (ENSOP). An initial questionnaire based on the training syllabus of the United Kingdom Faculty of Occupational Medicine was circulated and respondents were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results were discussed at a conference on the subject of competencies. A further questionnaire was developed and circulated which asked respondents to rank items within each section.

RESULTS

There was a 74% response in the first round and an 80% response in the second. Respondents' ratings from most important to least important were; occupational hazards to health, research methods, health promotion, occupational health law and ethics, communications, assessment of disability, environmental medicine, and management. In the second round, among those topics ranked most highly were; hazards to health and the illnesses which they cause, control of risks, and diagnoses of work related ill health. Topics such as principles of occupational safety and selection of personal protection equipment were of least importance. Although the assessment of fitness was regarded as important, monitoring and advising on sickness absence were not highly rated. Management competency was regarded as of low importance.

CONCLUSION

This survey identified that respondents had traditional disease focused views of the competencies required of occupational physicians and that competencies were lagging behind the evolving definition of occupational health.

摘要

目标

确定欧洲职业医师所需的核心共同能力。

方法

对欧洲职业医学学校协会(EASOM)、欧洲医学专业联盟职业医学分会(UEMS)以及欧洲职业医师协会网络(ENSOP)的成员进行了改良德尔菲调查。基于英国职业医学学院培训大纲的初始问卷被分发,要求受访者对每个项目的重要性进行评分。在一次关于能力主题的会议上对结果进行了讨论。随后制定并分发了进一步的问卷,要求受访者对每个部分的项目进行排序。

结果

第一轮的回复率为74%,第二轮为80%。受访者从最重要到最不重要的评分依次为:职业健康危害、研究方法、健康促进、职业健康法律与伦理、沟通、残疾评估、环境医学和管理。在第二轮中,排名最高的主题包括:健康危害及其导致的疾病、风险控制以及与工作相关的健康不良诊断。诸如职业安全原则和个人防护设备选择等主题最不重要。尽管健康评估被认为很重要,但对病假的监测和建议得分不高。管理能力被认为重要性较低。

结论

本次调查表明,受访者对职业医师所需能力持有传统的以疾病为重点的观点,且这些能力落后于职业健康不断演变的定义。