Antcliff R J, Stanford M R, Chauhan D S, Graham E M, Spalton D J, Shilling J S, Ffytche T J, Marshall J
GKT Department of Ophthalmology, Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, England.
Ophthalmology. 2000 Mar;107(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00087-1.
To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) with fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) for the detection of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients with uveitis.
Prospective comparative observational series.
One hundred twenty-one eyes of 58 patients with uveitis of varied causes (seven patients were studied twice).
Patients with suspected CME underwent OCT scanning followed by FFA at the same visit.
Detection and distribution of macular edema.
One hundred eight eyes had similar results on both OCT and FFA in that 67 eyes had CME and 41 eyes had no CME. In 10 eyes subretinal fluid was detected on OCT but not FFA. Five of these eyes had CME on FFA but not OCT. Three other eyes had CME that was detected by FFA but not by OCT. Compared with FFA, the OCT sensitivity for detecting CME was 96% (including the eyes with subretinal fluid), and the OCT specificity was 100%.
OCT is as effective at detecting CME as is FFA but is superior in demonstrating axial distribution of fluid.
比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与眼底荧光血管造影(FFA)在葡萄膜炎患者中检测黄斑囊样水肿(CME)的效果。
前瞻性比较观察系列研究。
58例病因各异的葡萄膜炎患者的121只眼(7例患者接受了两次研究)。
疑似CME的患者在同一次就诊时先接受OCT扫描,随后进行FFA检查。
黄斑水肿的检测及分布情况。
108只眼的OCT和FFA结果相似,其中67只眼有CME,41只眼无CME。10只眼在OCT上检测到视网膜下液,但FFA未检测到。其中5只眼FFA显示有CME而OCT未显示。另外3只眼的CME通过FFA检测到但OCT未检测到。与FFA相比,OCT检测CME的敏感性为96%(包括有视网膜下液的眼),特异性为100%。
OCT在检测CME方面与FFA同样有效,但在显示液体的轴向分布方面更具优势。