• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症中注意力分配缺陷的调查。

An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia.

作者信息

Tseng C H, McNeil M R, Milenkovic P

机构信息

National Chung-Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1993 Aug;45(2):276-96. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1046.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1993.1046
PMID:8358600
Abstract

Nine aphasic and 18 normal adults participated in a dual task with components of phoneme monitoring and semantic judgment. Subjects listened to lists of recorded spoken words and were required to detect semantic and phonetic targets. Two within-subject variables were manipulated: the probability of target occurrence for each dual-task component (.2, .5, and .8) and the explicitness of instruction (explicit vs. implicit). Only in the explicit condition were subjects told about the probability structure and given the attention allocation strategy congruent with that structure. Reaction times were recorded on-line for analysis by an IBM-AT. The results showed that normal subjects' overall latencies in detecting phonetic targets decreased as the target occurrence probability increased in both implicit and explicit instruction conditions. The detection latencies for semantic targets showed a similar probability effect but only in the explicit condition. By contrast, the aphasic subjects did not show the probability effect in any condition, although they performed above the chance level on both semantic and phonetic tasks. The presence of the probability effects for the normal subjects indicated that an efficient attention allocation mechanism was operating so as to optimize the performance level. On the other hand, the absence of probability effects for the aphasic subjects suggests that their attention control system might be inefficient so that task-demand cues (probability and attention allocation instruction) were not utilized properly.

摘要

9名失语症患者和18名正常成年人参与了一项包含音素监测和语义判断成分的双重任务。受试者听录制好的单词列表,并被要求检测语义和语音目标。操纵了两个受试者内变量:每个双重任务成分的目标出现概率(0.2、0.5和0.8)以及指令的明确性(明确与隐含)。只有在明确条件下,才会告知受试者概率结构,并给予与该结构一致的注意力分配策略。反应时间通过IBM-AT在线记录以便分析。结果表明,在隐含和明确指令条件下,正常受试者检测语音目标的总体潜伏期随着目标出现概率的增加而缩短。语义目标的检测潜伏期显示出类似的概率效应,但仅在明确条件下。相比之下,失语症患者在任何条件下都未表现出概率效应,尽管他们在语义和语音任务上的表现均高于随机水平。正常受试者存在概率效应表明一种有效的注意力分配机制在起作用,以优化表现水平。另一方面,失语症患者不存在概率效应表明他们的注意力控制系统可能效率低下,以至于任务需求线索(概率和注意力分配指令)未得到恰当利用。

相似文献

1
An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia.失语症中注意力分配缺陷的调查。
Brain Lang. 1993 Aug;45(2):276-96. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1046.
2
Phonological, semantic, and mediated priming in aphasia.失语症中的语音、语义和中介启动效应
Brain Lang. 1997 Dec;60(3):347-59. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1829.
3
Language deviations in aphasia: a frequency analysis.失语症中的语言偏差:频率分析
Brain Lang. 1993 Feb;44(2):165-80. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1011.
4
The effects of varying attentional demands on the word retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage, or no brain damage.不同注意力需求对失语症成人、右脑损伤成人或无脑部损伤成人词汇检索技能的影响。
Brain Lang. 2000 Mar;72(1):40-72. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2281.
5
Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: effects of item, task, and lexical impairment.失语症中听觉言语短时记忆广度的测量:项目、任务及词汇损伤的影响
Brain Lang. 2004 Jun;89(3):464-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.004.
6
Auditory vigilance in aphasic individuals: detecting nonlinguistic stimuli with full or divided attention.失语症患者的听觉警觉性:全神贯注或分散注意力检测非语言刺激。
Brain Cogn. 1996 Mar;30(2):244-53. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0016.
7
Linguistic deficits in the acute phase of stroke.中风急性期的语言缺陷。
J Neurol. 2003 Aug;250(8):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1134-9.
8
The gradual deterioration of syntax and semantics in a patient with progressive aphasia.一名进行性失语症患者的句法和语义逐渐退化。
Brain Lang. 1997 Feb 15;56(3):426-76. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1857.
9
[Variability in the semantic errors produced by brain-injured patients].[脑损伤患者产生的语义错误的变异性]
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):795-800.
10
Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: a case study.使用图片-单词干扰任务探索失语症患者单词生成的动态过程:一项个案研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):939-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.026. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Vigilant Attention During Cognitive and Language Processing in Aphasia.在失语症的认知和语言处理过程中保持警惕的注意力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3133-3147. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00168. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.句子处理过程中认知努力的展开:失语症患者与非失语症患者的瞳孔测量证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4900-4917. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00129. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Top-Down Inference in the Auditory System: Potential Roles for Corticofugal Projections.
听觉系统中的自上而下推理:皮质传出投射的潜在作用。
Front Neural Circuits. 2021 Jan 22;14:615259. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2020.615259. eCollection 2020.
4
Quality of Communication Life in People with Aphasia: Implications for Intervention.失语症患者的沟通生活质量:对干预的启示
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020 Sep;23(Suppl 2):S156-S161. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_557_20. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
Maintenance Versus Transmission Deficits: The Effect of Delay on Naming Performance in Aphasia.维持性缺陷与传导性缺陷:延迟对失语症命名表现的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Nov 27;13:406. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00406. eCollection 2019.
6
Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners' Continuous Performance Test - 2nd edition.失语症个体的注意力:康纳斯连续操作测验-第 2 版的表现。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(2):249-265. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
The paced auditory serial addition test for working memory assessment: Psychometric properties.用于工作记忆评估的听觉序列加法测验:心理测量学特性。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Sep 11;31:61. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.61. eCollection 2017.
8
More Than the Verbal Stimulus Matters: Visual Attention in Language Assessment for People With Aphasia Using Multiple-Choice Image Displays.不仅仅是言语刺激起作用:使用多项选择图像显示对失语症患者进行语言评估时的视觉注意力
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1348-1361. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0087.
9
Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content: a case series.基于模仿的失语症疗法可增加叙事内容:一项病例系列研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Nov;31(11):1500-1507. doi: 10.1177/0269215517703765. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Performance Variability as a Predictor of Response to Aphasia Treatment.作为失语症治疗反应预测指标的表现变异性
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Oct;30(9):876-82. doi: 10.1177/1545968316642522. Epub 2016 Apr 6.