Stenson K M, MacCracken E, List M, Haraf D J, Brockstein B, Weichselbaum R, Vokes E E
Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Ill 60637, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Mar;126(3):371-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.3.371.
To define the site-specific swallowing dysfunctions of patients with head and neck cancer with respect to tumor site and stage by, videofluoroscopic oropharyngeal motility (OPM) study prior to initiation of treatment.
Retrospective survey.
Academic university institution.
A consecutive sample of 79 patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer without prior treatment or tracheotomy. Patients were divided into groups according to tumor site: oral cavity (n = 7), oropharynx (n = 27), larynx (n = 24), and hypopharynx (n = 10). Patients with sinonasal, nasopharyngeal, and unknown primary carcinomas served as the comparison group (n = 11).
All patients underwent OPM study prior to treatment.
Parameters of swallowing function, including oral impairment, pharyngeal impairment, cervical esophageal impairment, aspiration, and Swallowing Performance Status Scale (SPSS) score (a global measure of swallowing function) were extracted from the pretreatment OPM study and analyzed with reference to tumor site, T stage, and overall stage. The relations between tumor site and area or degree of dysfunction, and between stage of disease and area or degree of dysfunction were analyzed using chi2 and Fisher exact tests.
Aspiration status, cervical esophageal impairment, and pharyngeal impairment examined as a function of disease site showed statistically significant differences between groups, with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal sites revealing the most severe dysfunctions. The SPSS score did not correlate with tumor site, T stage, or overall stage. Other OPM parameters analyzed as a function of T stage and overall stage revealed no consistent patterns.
Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal disease sites have a high degree of pretreatment functional impairment. The SPSS score is a good global measure of swallowing dysfunction. In addition, significant site-specific dysfunctions are found when the OPM study is analyzed via its separate parameters. It is therefore critical that posttreatment function is compared with baseline pretreatment dysfunction.
通过在治疗开始前进行电视荧光吞咽造影口咽动力(OPM)研究,明确头颈部癌患者根据肿瘤部位和分期的特定部位吞咽功能障碍情况。
回顾性调查。
大学学术机构。
连续选取79例未经治疗或气管切开的Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期头颈部癌患者。患者根据肿瘤部位分为几组:口腔(n = 7)、口咽(n = 27)、喉(n = 24)和下咽(n = 10)。鼻窦、鼻咽和原发癌不明的患者作为对照组(n = 11)。
所有患者在治疗前均接受OPM研究。
从治疗前OPM研究中提取吞咽功能参数,包括口腔功能障碍、咽功能障碍、颈段食管功能障碍、误吸以及吞咽表现状态量表(SPSS)评分(吞咽功能的综合指标),并参照肿瘤部位、T分期和总分期进行分析。使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验分析肿瘤部位与功能障碍区域或程度之间的关系,以及疾病分期与功能障碍区域或程度之间的关系。
将误吸状态、颈段食管功能障碍和咽功能障碍作为疾病部位的函数进行分析,结果显示组间存在统计学显著差异,喉和下咽部位的功能障碍最为严重。SPSS评分与肿瘤部位、T分期或总分期均无相关性。将其他OPM参数作为T分期和总分期的函数进行分析,未发现一致的模式。
下咽和喉部疾病部位在治疗前存在高度功能障碍。SPSS评分是吞咽功能障碍的良好综合指标。此外,通过单独参数分析OPM研究时发现了显著的特定部位功能障碍。因此,将治疗后功能与治疗前基线功能障碍进行比较至关重要。