Tirabassi R S, Enquist L W
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
J Virol. 2000 Apr;74(8):3505-16. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.8.3505-3516.2000.
The glycoproteins I and E of pseudorabies virus are important mediators of cell-to-cell spread and virulence in all animal models tested. Although these two proteins form a complex with one another, ascribing any function to the individual proteins has been difficult. We have shown previously, using nonsense mutations, that the N-terminal ectodomain of the gE protein is sufficient for gE-mediated transsynaptic spread whereas the cytoplasmic domain of the protein is required for full expression of virulence. These same studies demonstrated that the cytoplasmic domain of gE is also required for endocytosis of the protein. In this report, we describe the construction of viruses with nonsense mutations in gI that allowed us to determine the contributions of the gI cytoplasmic domain to protein expression as well as virus neuroinvasion and virulence after infection of the rat eye. We also constructed double mutants with nonsense mutations in both gE and gI so that the contributions of both the gE and gI cytoplasmic domains could be determined. We observed that the gI cytoplasmic domain is required for efficient posttranslational modification of the gI protein. The gE cytoplasmic domain has no effect on gE posttranslational glycosylation. In addition, we found that infection of all gE-gI-dependent anterograde circuits projecting from the rat retina requires both ectodomains and at least one of the cytoplasmic domains of the proteins. The gI cytoplasmic domain promotes transsynaptic spread of virus better than the gE cytoplasmic domain. Interestingly, both gE and gI cytoplasmic tails are required for virulence; lack of either one or both results in an attenuated infection. These data suggest that gE and gI play differential roles in mediating directional neuroinvasion of the rat; however, the gE and gI cytoplasmic domains most likely function together to promote virulence.
伪狂犬病病毒的糖蛋白I和E是在所有测试的动物模型中细胞间传播和毒力的重要介质。尽管这两种蛋白相互形成复合物,但确定单个蛋白的任何功能都很困难。我们之前使用无义突变表明,gE蛋白的N端胞外域足以介导gE介导的跨突触传播,而该蛋白的胞质域是毒力充分表达所必需的。这些相同的研究还表明,gE的胞质域也是该蛋白内吞作用所必需的。在本报告中,我们描述了构建在gI中带有无义突变的病毒,这使我们能够确定gI胞质域对蛋白表达以及大鼠眼部感染后病毒神经侵袭和毒力的贡献。我们还构建了在gE和gI中均带有无义突变的双突变体,以便确定gE和gI胞质域的贡献。我们观察到,gI胞质域是gI蛋白有效翻译后修饰所必需的。gE胞质域对gE翻译后糖基化没有影响。此外,我们发现,从大鼠视网膜投射的所有依赖gE - gI的顺行神经回路的感染都需要这两种蛋白的胞外域和至少一个胞质域。gI胞质域比gE胞质域更能促进病毒的跨突触传播。有趣的是,毒力需要gE和gI的胞质尾;缺少其中任何一个或两个都会导致感染减弱。这些数据表明,gE和gI在介导大鼠的定向神经侵袭中发挥不同作用;然而,gE和gI胞质域很可能共同发挥作用以促进毒力。