• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

闭门探讨：患者护理中的问责制与责任

Behind closed doors: accountability and responsibility in patient care.

作者信息

Sharpe V A

机构信息

The Hastings Center, New York, New York 10524-5555, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2000 Feb;25(1):28-47. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200002)25:1;1-V;FT028.

DOI:10.1076/0360-5310(200002)25:1;1-V;FT028
PMID:10732874
Abstract

In this paper, I examine the notion of accountability and its historical evolution in health care. Using medical mistakes and adverse patient outcomes as my focus, I examine the interests served by particular models of accountability and argue for a model of collective fiduciary responsibility in U.S. health care today.

摘要

在本文中，我探讨了医疗保健领域中问责制的概念及其历史演变。以医疗失误和患者不良后果为重点，我分析了特定问责制模式所服务的利益，并主张在美国当今的医疗保健中采用集体信托责任模式。

相似文献

1
Behind closed doors: accountability and responsibility in patient care.闭门探讨：患者护理中的问责制与责任
J Med Philos. 2000 Feb;25(1):28-47. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200002)25:1;1-V;FT028.
2
A basic concept in the clinical ethics of managed care: physicians and institutions as economically disciplined moral co-fiduciaries of populations of patients.管理式医疗临床伦理学中的一个基本概念：医生和医疗机构作为对患者群体负有经济约束责任的道德共同受托人。
J Med Philos. 1999 Feb;24(1):77-97. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.1.77.2541.
3
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part I: History of medical ethics, the physician and the patient, the physician's relationship to other physicians, the physician and society. Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Ethics, American College of Physicians.美国医师协会伦理手册。第一部分：医学伦理史、医师与患者、医师与其他医师的关系、医师与社会。美国医师协会医学伦理特设委员会
Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jul;101(1):129-37.
4
The social responsibilities of nursing.
Nurs Econ. 1983 Jul-Aug;1(1):61-4, 72.
5
Catholic health care in the United States: American pluralism and religious meanings.美国的天主教医疗保健：美国的多元主义与宗教意义。
Christ Bioeth. 1999 Apr;5(1):44-65. doi: 10.1076/chbi.5.1.44.3797.
6
When pestilence prevails...physician responsibilities in epidemics.当瘟疫流行时……医生在流行病中的职责。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Winter;4(1):W5-11. doi: 10.1162/152651604773067497.
7
AMA marks 150 years of caring.美国医学协会迎来150周年的关爱历程。
Health Care Food Nutr Focus. 1997 Jul;13(11):1, 4-5.
8
The virtue of moral responsibility and the obligations of patients.道德责任的美德与患者的义务。
J Med Philos. 2005 Apr;30(2):153-66. doi: 10.1080/03605310590926830.
9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
The looming fight over health care reform: what we can learn from past debates.迫在眉睫的医疗保健改革之争：我们能从过去的辩论中学到什么。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1994 Summer;19(3):70-80.

引用本文的文献

1
The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm.言语的力量与伤痛：伤害患者后语言在回应中的重要性
Front Health Serv. 2025 Feb 13;5:1513670. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670. eCollection 2025.
2
CPR Quality Officer role to improve CPR quality: A multi-centred international simulation randomised control trial.心肺复苏质量官角色对改善心肺复苏质量的作用：一项多中心国际模拟随机对照试验
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jan 2;17:100537. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100537. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Medicolegal Considerations in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care.
多学科癌症护理中的法医学考量
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Nov 1;1(4):100073. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100073. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
A new paradigm on health care accountability to improve the quality of the system: four parameters to achieve individual and collective accountability.一种关于医疗保健问责制以改善系统质量的新范式：实现个人和集体问责制的四个参数。
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010301. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010301.
5
A system of medical error disclosure.医疗差错披露系统。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):64-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.64.