Croft R J, Barry R J
Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Australia.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Feb;30(1):5-19. doi: 10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00055-1.
Eye movements cause changes to the electric fields around the eyes, and consequently over the scalp. As a result, EEG recordings are often significantly distorted, and their interpretation problematic. A number of methods have been proposed to overcome this problem, ranging from the rejection of data corresponding temporally to large eye movements, to the removal of the estimated effect of ocular activity from the EEG (EOG correction). This paper reviews a number of such methods of dealing with ocular artifact in the EEG, focusing on the relative merits of a variety of EOG correction procedures. Issues discussed include the distinction between frequency and time domain approaches, the number of EOG channels required for adequate correction, estimating correction coefficients from raw versus averaged data, differential correction of different types of eye movement, the most suitable statistical procedure for estimating correction coefficients, the use of calibration trials for the estimation of correction coefficients, and the distinction between 'coefficient estimation' and 'correction phase' error. A suggested EOG correction algorithm is also described.
眼球运动会导致眼睛周围以及头皮上方电场的变化。因此,脑电图(EEG)记录常常会严重失真,其解读也存在问题。人们已经提出了许多方法来克服这个问题,从在时间上剔除与大幅度眼球运动相对应的数据,到从脑电图中去除估计的眼动活动影响(眼电矫正,EOG矫正)。本文回顾了一些处理脑电图中眼动伪迹的此类方法,重点关注各种眼电矫正程序的相对优点。讨论的问题包括频域和时域方法之间的区别、进行充分矫正所需的眼电通道数量、从原始数据与平均数据估计矫正系数、对不同类型眼球运动的差分矫正、估计矫正系数最合适的统计程序、使用校准试验来估计矫正系数,以及“系数估计”和“矫正阶段”误差之间的区别。还描述了一种建议的眼电矫正算法。