• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谈判。

Negotiation.

作者信息

Bazerman M H, Curhan J R, Moore D A, Valley K L

机构信息

Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:279-314. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279.

DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279
PMID:10751973
Abstract

The first part of this paper traces a short history of the psychological study of negotiation. Although negotiation was an active research topic within social psychology in the 1960s and 1970s, in the 1980s, the behavioral decision perspective dominated. The 1990s has witnessed a rebirth of social factors in the psychological study of negotiation, including social relationships, egocentrism, motivated illusions, and emotion. The second part of this paper reviews five emerging research areas, each of which provides useful insight into how negotiators subjectively understand the negotiation: (a) mental models in negotiation; (b) how concerns of ethics, fairness, and values define the rules of the game being played; (c) how the selection of a communication medium impacts the way the game is played; (d) how cross-cultural issues in perception and behavior affect the negotiation game; and (e) how negotiators organize and simplify their understandings of the negotiation game when more than two actors are involved.

摘要

本文的第一部分追溯了谈判心理学研究的简短历史。尽管谈判在20世纪60年代和70年代是社会心理学中的一个活跃研究主题,但在20世纪80年代,行为决策视角占据了主导地位。20世纪90年代见证了谈判心理学研究中社会因素的复兴,包括社会关系、自我中心主义、动机性错觉和情感。本文的第二部分回顾了五个新兴研究领域,每个领域都为谈判者如何主观理解谈判提供了有益的见解:(a)谈判中的心理模型;(b)道德、公平和价值观的考量如何定义正在进行的博弈规则;(c)沟通媒介的选择如何影响博弈的进行方式;(d)感知和行为中的跨文化问题如何影响谈判博弈;以及(e)当涉及两个以上参与者时,谈判者如何组织和简化他们对谈判博弈的理解。

相似文献

1
Negotiation.谈判。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:279-314. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279.
2
Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.隐性谈判信念与绩效:实验及纵向证据
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):49-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.49.
3
Complexity in electronic negotiation support systems.电子谈判支持系统中的复杂性。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2011 Oct;15(4):477-511.
4
3-D negotiation. Playing the whole game.三维谈判。玩整场游戏。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Nov;81(11):64-74, 138.
5
Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.团队谈判:亚群体冲突的社会、认知、经济及心理后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1687-702. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324102. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
6
Evolving fuzzy rules for relaxed-criteria negotiation.用于宽松标准协商的进化模糊规则
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Dec;38(6):1486-500. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.928210.
7
Claiming a large slice of a small pie: asymmetric disconfirmation in negotiation.在小份额中占据大比例:谈判中的不对称性否证
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Aug;93(2):212-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.212.
8
Mind games: the mental representation of conflict.思维游戏:冲突的心理表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan;102(1):132-48. doi: 10.1037/a0025389. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
9
Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.谈判者的讨价还价历史及其对未来谈判表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):350-62. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.350.
10
Paying a price: culture, trust, and negotiation consequences.付出代价:文化、信任和谈判结果。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):774-89. doi: 10.1037/a0021986.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain Oscillations and Autonomic Synthonization via Comodulation in Collaborative Negotiation.协作谈判中通过共调制实现的脑振荡与自主同步化
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;27(8):873. doi: 10.3390/e27080873.
2
The role of perceived risk on dishonest decision making during a pandemic.感知风险在大流行期间不诚实决策中的作用。
Risk Anal. 2024 Dec;44(12):2762-2779. doi: 10.1111/risa.14082. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Collaborative Settings Increase Dishonesty.合作环境会增加不诚实行为。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 14;12:650032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650032. eCollection 2021.
4
Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.分配性谈判中的面子威胁敏感性:对谈判者自尊及要求的影响
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020 Nov;161:255-273. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Partners in School: An Implementation Strategy to Promote Alignment of Evidence-Based Practices Across Home and School for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.学校合作伙伴:将自闭症谱系障碍儿童的循证实践在家庭和学校中进行协同的实施策略。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Mar;48(2):266-278. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01064-9.
6
Variables Associated With Negotiation Effectiveness: The Role of Mindfulness.与谈判成效相关的变量:正念的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01214. eCollection 2020.
7
Partners in School: An Innovative Parent-Teacher Consultation Model for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.学校合作伙伴:一种针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的创新型家长-教师咨询模式
J Educ Psychol Consult. 2018;28(4):460-486. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2018.1431550. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
The Impact of Mixed Emotions on Creativity in Negotiation: An Interpersonal Perspective.混合情绪对谈判创造力的影响:一种人际视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 11;9:2660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02660. eCollection 2018.
9
Mind the First Step: The Intrapersonal Effects of Affect on the Decision to Initiate Negotiations under Bargaining Power Asymmetry.注意第一步:在议价能力不对称情况下,情感对启动谈判决策的个体内部影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 2;8:1313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01313. eCollection 2017.
10
The collaborative roots of corruption.腐败的合作根源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10651-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423035112. Epub 2015 Aug 10.