Suppr超能文献

卡马西平用于重症监护病房吉兰-巴雷综合征患者的疼痛管理。

Carbamezapine for pain management in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Tripathi M, Kaushik S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2000 Mar;28(3):655-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200003000-00009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate carbamezapine (CBZ) for neuritic pain relief in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomly allocated cross-over study days.

SETTING

ICU in a tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve consecutive, conscious adult (22-54 yrs) patients with GBS during recovery from the muscular weakness and receiving pressure-support ventilation in the ICU. All patients complained of severe backache and/or leg cramps and tenderness in muscles, and they required opioids for pain relief.

INTERVENTIONS

CBZ (100 mg every 8 hrs) or equivalent placebo was given to nursing staff in coded powder form. Medication was given to patients through a nasogastric feeding tube. The same coded medicine was given for 3 days, and after a 1-day omission, a second set of coded powder was given for the next 3 days in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion. Pethidine (1 mg x kg(-1)) was given intravenously in between, if the pain score was >2. Group 1 (n = 6) patients were given a placebo on the first 3 days, followed by CBZ. Group 2 (n = 6) patients were given CBZ on the first 3 days, followed by a placebo.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In these two study periods of different medications, we observed and scored pain (1, no pain; 5, severe pain), sedation (1, alert; 6, asleep, does not respond to verbal command), and total pethidine requirement per day. In group 1 patients, a significant (p < .001) improvement in the sedation score and a low requirement for pethidine was observed 3 days later, when CBZ was started. However, in group 2 patients, a gradual increase in the pethidine requirement and a high sedation score were noteworthy in the later days of placebo medication. Observations were also analyzed for CBZ days vs. placebo days. Overall, the pain score (1.7 +/- 0.8) during the CBZ period of both regimens was significantly (p < .001) lower than during the placebo days (3.1 +/- 0.9). Significantly higher doses of pethidine (3.7 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/day) were used on the placebo days than on the CBZ days (1.7 +/- 1.0 mg/kg/day).

CONCLUSION

The pain in GBS has a dual origin, and we recommend CBZ as an adjuvant to treat pain in GBS patients, during the recovery phase in the ICU, to reduce the narcotic requirement.

摘要

目的

评估卡马西平(CBZ)对重症监护病房(ICU)中吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)患者神经炎性疼痛的缓解作用。

设计

前瞻性、双盲、随机分配的交叉研究日。

设置

一所三级护理大学医院的ICU。

参与者

12名连续的、意识清醒的成年(22 - 54岁)GBS患者,处于从肌无力恢复阶段,在ICU接受压力支持通气。所有患者均主诉严重背痛和/或腿部痉挛以及肌肉压痛,且需要使用阿片类药物缓解疼痛。

干预措施

将CBZ(每8小时100毫克)或等效安慰剂以编码粉末形式提供给护理人员。通过鼻饲管给患者用药。以随机、双盲、交叉方式给予相同编码的药物3天,在停药1天后,再给予另一组编码粉末3天。若疼痛评分>2,则在此期间静脉注射哌替啶(1毫克/千克)。第1组(n = 6)患者在头3天给予安慰剂,随后给予CBZ。第2组(n = 6)患者在头3天给予CBZ,随后给予安慰剂。

测量指标及主要结果

在这两个不同药物治疗阶段,我们观察并记录疼痛程度(1分,无疼痛;5分,重度疼痛)、镇静程度(1分,清醒;6分,入睡,对言语指令无反应)以及每日哌替啶总需求量。在第1组患者中,开始使用CBZ 3天后,镇静评分显著改善(p <.001),哌替啶需求量降低。然而,在第2组患者中,在安慰剂用药后期,哌替啶需求量逐渐增加且镇静评分较高。还对CBZ用药日与安慰剂用药日的观察结果进行了分析。总体而言,两种治疗方案的CBZ治疗期间疼痛评分(1.7±0.8)显著低于安慰剂治疗日(3.1±0.9)(p <.001)。安慰剂治疗日使用的哌替啶剂量(3.7±0.9毫克/千克/天)显著高于CBZ治疗日(1.7±1.0毫克/千克/天)。

结论

GBS患者的疼痛有双重来源,我们建议在ICU恢复阶段,将CBZ作为辅助药物治疗GBS患者的疼痛,以减少麻醉药物的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验