Ames G M, Grube J W, Moore R S
Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, California 94704, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Mar;61(2):203-19. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.203.
This article reports on an investigation of the relationship of social control mechanisms at work to drinking practices of 10,000 salaried and hourly employees working in the same U.S. industry, with the same union, but in two different work environments. One work environment reflected an organizational culture that is traditional to U.S. management; the other was based on a nontraditional Japanese transplant model.
The research team used a combination of methods including in-home surveys (N = 1,723; 1,378 men) and ethnography (110 semistructured interviews and 200 hours of direct observation inside the plants). Respondents were asked about general and work-related drinking, perceptions of drinking norms, strengths or weaknesses of alcohol-related policies and procedures for policy enforcement.
Although overall consumption rates in both populations were similar, significant differences between the two samples existed regarding work-related drinking. The Traditional (i.e., U.S.) model was associated with more permissive norms regarding drinking before or during work shifts (including breaks) and higher workplace drinking rates than the Transplant (i.e., Japanese) model. Analyses revealed that alcohol policies, and the extent to which policies are actually enforced, predicted drinking norms and alcohol availability at work. Drinking norms, in turn, predicted work-related drinking and accounted for differences in alcohol consumption between the two worksites. Analyses of ethnographic data provided descriptive understandings of aspects of the two organizational cultures that disabled mechanisms for social control of drinking in one setting and enabled those mechanisms in the other.
These understandings of how social control mechanisms predict work-related drinking practices provide guidelines for alcohol problem prevention in a specific kind of occupational environment. However, our identification of aspects of social control that successfully regulate workplace drinking is applicable to other kinds of occupational settings as well.
本文报告了一项调查,研究了美国同一行业、同一工会但处于两种不同工作环境中的10000名受薪和计时员工的工作场所社会控制机制与饮酒行为之间的关系。一种工作环境反映了美国管理传统的组织文化;另一种则基于非传统的日本移植模式。
研究团队采用了多种方法,包括家庭调查(N = 1723;1378名男性)和人种志研究(110次半结构化访谈以及在工厂内进行200小时的直接观察)。受访者被问及一般饮酒和与工作相关的饮酒情况、对饮酒规范的看法、与酒精相关政策及政策执行程序的优缺点。
尽管两组人群的总体饮酒率相似,但在与工作相关的饮酒方面,两个样本之间存在显著差异。传统(即美国)模式在工作班次期间(包括休息时间)饮酒方面的规范更为宽松,工作场所饮酒率也高于移植(即日本)模式。分析表明,酒精政策以及政策的实际执行程度能够预测饮酒规范和工作场所的酒精供应情况。饮酒规范反过来又能预测与工作相关的饮酒行为,并解释了两个工作场所酒精消费的差异。对人种志数据的分析提供了对两种组织文化方面的描述性理解,一种文化环境削弱了饮酒社会控制机制,而另一种则增强了这些机制。
这些关于社会控制机制如何预测与工作相关饮酒行为的理解,为特定职业环境中的酒精问题预防提供了指导方针。然而,我们对成功规范工作场所饮酒的社会控制方面的识别也适用于其他类型的职业环境。