Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Brain Lang. 2000 May;72(3):246-309. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2292.
Semantic category effects, such as difficulties in naming animate things relative to inanimate objects, have been explained in terms of the relative weightings of perceptual and functional features within the semantic representations of these concepts. We argue that grammatical category deficits, such as difficulties in naming nouns relative to verbs, can be explained within the same framework. We hypothesize that verb concepts are richer in functional than sensory features and present a model of the semantic representations of animate nouns, inanimate nouns, and verbs. The model demonstrates that sensory feature damage results in a deficit for naming living things but spares verb naming, and functional feature damage results in a deficit for naming inanimate objects and verbs. We then report the assessment results of two patient groups. In accordance with the model's predictions, the "verb spared" patients were consistently worse at naming living things than inanimate objects, and their definitions of both living and nonliving items were lacking in sensory information. We conclude that damage to sensory features in semantic representations causes difficulties in naming concrete nouns relative to action verbs, and within the grammatical category of nouns, animate items will be more severely affected. Imageability was shown to be a strong predictor of naming performance in the "verb deficit" patients, and when this variable was controlled no class effect remained. Production of definitions revealed no differential damage to sensory or functional features, and no consistent effect of animacy in naming was shown. While the model suggests that verb deficits might occur in patients for whom functional features are damaged relative to sensory features, we conclude that the "verb deficit" shown in our patients (and potentially in many previously reported cases) was an artifact of the lower imageability of verbs in confrontation naming tasks.
语义范畴效应,比如相对于无生命物体而言,命名有生命物体存在困难,已根据这些概念的语义表征中感知特征和功能特征的相对权重得到了解释。我们认为,语法范畴缺陷,比如相对于动词而言,命名名词存在困难,也可以在同一框架内得到解释。我们假设动词概念在功能特征方面比感官特征更丰富,并提出了一个关于有生命名词、无生命名词和动词的语义表征模型。该模型表明,感官特征受损会导致命名有生命物体出现缺陷,但动词命名不受影响,而功能特征受损会导致命名无生命物体和动词出现缺陷。然后我们报告了两个患者组的评估结果。与模型的预测一致,“动词保留”患者在命名有生命物体方面始终比命名无生命物体更差,并且他们对有生命和无生命物体的定义都缺乏感官信息。我们得出结论,语义表征中感官特征的损伤会导致相对于动作动词而言,命名具体名词存在困难,并且在名词的语法范畴内,有生命物体将受到更严重的影响。在“动词缺陷”患者中,可想象性被证明是命名表现的一个强有力的预测指标,当控制这个变量时,类别效应不再存在。定义的生成没有显示出对感官或功能特征的差异损伤,并且在命名中没有显示出一致的有生命性效应。虽然该模型表明,对于功能特征相对于感官特征受损的患者可能会出现动词缺陷,但我们得出结论,我们的患者(以及可能在许多先前报道的病例中)所表现出的“动词缺陷”是在对答命名任务中动词可想象性较低的产物。