Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, USA; Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, USA; Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, USA; Linguistics Program, University of South Carolina, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107183. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Studies on the organization of conceptual knowledge have examined categories of concrete nouns extensively. Less is known about the neural basis of verb categories suggested by linguistic theories. We used functional MRI to examine the differences between manner verbs, which encode information about the manner of an action, versus instrument verbs, which encode information about an object as part of their meaning. Using both visual and verbal stimuli and a combination of univariate and multivariate pattern analyses, our results show that accessing conceptual representations of instrument class involves brain regions typically associated with complex action and object perception, including the anterior inferior parietal cortex and occipito-temporal cortex. On the other hand, accessing conceptual representations of the manner class involves regions that are commonly associated with the processing of visual and biological motion, in the posterior superior temporal sulcus. These findings support the idea that the semantics of manner and instrument verbs are supported by distinct neural mechanisms.
关于概念知识组织的研究已经广泛研究了具体名词的类别。关于语言理论所提出的动词类别,我们了解得较少。我们使用功能磁共振成像来研究表示动作方式的方式动词与表示作为其意义一部分的物体的工具动词之间的差异。使用视觉和语言刺激以及单变量和多变量模式分析的组合,我们的结果表明,访问工具类的概念表示涉及通常与复杂动作和物体感知相关的大脑区域,包括前下顶叶皮层和枕颞叶皮层。另一方面,访问方式类的概念表示涉及通常与视觉和生物运动处理相关的区域,在后上颞叶沟。这些发现支持这样的观点,即方式动词和工具动词的语义由不同的神经机制支持。