• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颞叶中单词类别的神经表示是不同的:激活可能性分析。

Neural representation of word categories is distinct in the temporal lobe: An activation likelihood analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Dec;39(12):4925-4938. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24334. Epub 2018 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.24334
PMID:30120847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6866469/
Abstract

The distinction between nouns and verbs is a language universal. Yet, functional neuroimaging studies comparing noun and verb processing have yielded inconsistent findings, ranging from a complete frontal(verb)-temporal(noun) dichotomy to a complete overlap in activation patterns. The current study addressed the debate about neural distinctions between nouns and verbs by conducting an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. Two levels of analysis were conducted: simple effects (Verbs vs. Baseline, Nouns vs. Baseline), and direct comparisons (Verbs vs. Nouns, Nouns vs. Verbs). Nouns were uniquely associated with a left medial temporal cluster (BA37). Activation foci for verbs included extensive inferior frontal (BA44-47) and mid-temporal (BA22, 21) regions in the left hemisphere. These findings confirm that the two grammatical classes have distinct neural architecture in supra-modal brain regions. Further, nouns and verbs overlapped in a small left lateral inferior temporal activation cluster (BA37), which is a region for modality-independent, grammatical class-independent lexical representations. These findings are most consistent with the view that as one acquires language, linguistic representations for a lexical category shift from the modality specific cortices which represent prototypical members of that category (e.g., motion for verbs) to abstract amodal representations in close proximity to modality specific cortices.

摘要

名词和动词之间的区别是一种语言普遍性。然而,将医学专业学术文献翻译为简体中文时,比较名词和动词处理的功能神经影像学研究得出的结果并不一致,从完全的额叶(动词)-颞叶(名词)二分法到激活模式的完全重叠。本研究通过对概率细胞构筑图进行激活似然估计 (ALE) 元分析,解决了关于名词和动词之间神经区别的争论。进行了两个层次的分析:简单效应(动词与基线相比,名词与基线相比)和直接比较(动词与名词相比,名词与动词相比)。名词与左侧内侧颞叶簇(BA37)唯一相关。动词的激活焦点包括左侧额下回(BA44-47)和中颞(BA22、21)区域的广泛激活。这些发现证实了这两个语法类别在超模态大脑区域具有独特的神经结构。此外,名词和动词在左侧外侧颞叶的一个小激活簇(BA37)中重叠,这是一个与模态无关、语法类别无关的词汇代表区域。这些发现与以下观点最为一致,即随着人们习得语言,词汇类别代表的语言表达从代表该类别的典型成员的特定模态皮质(例如动词的运动)转移到与特定模态皮质接近的抽象非模态表示。

相似文献

1
Neural representation of word categories is distinct in the temporal lobe: An activation likelihood analysis.颞叶中单词类别的神经表示是不同的:激活可能性分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Dec;39(12):4925-4938. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24334. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
2
A Double Dissociation in Sensitivity to Verb and Noun Semantics Across Cortical Networks.大脑皮质网络中动词和名词语义敏感性的双重分离。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4803-4817. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz014.
3
Functional neuroimaging of grammatical class: ambiguous and unambiguous nouns and verbs.语法类别功能神经成像:歧义与非歧义名词和动词
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;26(2):148-71. doi: 10.1080/02643290802536090. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
4
Grammatical categories in the brain: the role of morphological structure.大脑中的语法类别:形态结构的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Aug;17(8):1812-20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl099. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
5
Electrical stimulation mapping of nouns and verbs in Broca's area.布罗卡区名词和动词的电刺激图谱。
Brain Lang. 2015 Jun-Jul;145-146:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
Predication drives verb cortical signatures.预测驱动动词皮层特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1829-39. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00598. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Neural representations of nouns and verbs in Chinese: an fMRI study.汉语中名词和动词的神经表征:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1533-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.044.
8
The representation of noun-verb distinction in left posterior middle temporal gyrus: evidence from representation similarity analyses.左后颞中回中名词-动词区别的表示:来自表示相似性分析的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jul 3;34(7). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae242.
9
Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories.名词、动词、宾语、动作及抽象概念:局部功能磁共振成像活动反映的是语义,而非词汇类别。
Brain Lang. 2014 May;132(100):28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
10
Tracing the interplay between syntactic and lexical features: fMRI evidence from agreement comprehension.追踪句法和词汇特征之间的相互作用:来自一致理解的 fMRI 证据。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.069. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The neural representation of body part concepts.身体部位概念的神经表示。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jun 4;34(6). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae213.
2
Distinct neural mechanisms underlying conceptual knowledge of manner and instrument verbs.方式动词和工具动词概念知识的不同神经机制。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107183. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Reduced Repertoire of Cortical Microstates and Neuronal Ensembles in Medically Induced Loss of Consciousness.药物诱导意识丧失患者皮质微观状态和神经元集合的储备减少。
Cell Syst. 2019 May 22;8(5):467-474.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociable intrinsic functional networks support noun-object and verb-action processing.可分离的内在功能网络支持名词-宾语和动词-动作处理。
Brain Lang. 2017 Dec;175:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders.人类语义知识及其障碍的统一模型。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0039. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Noun and verb knowledge in monolingual preschool children across 17 languages: Data from Cross-linguistic Lexical Tasks (LITMUS-CLT).17种语言的单语学龄前儿童的名词和动词知识:来自跨语言词汇任务(LITMUS-CLT)的数据。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(11-12):818-843. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1308553. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
4
A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks.一个共同的神经中枢通过与特定任务网络合作来解决句法和非句法冲突。
Brain Lang. 2017 Mar;166:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition.语义认知的神经和计算基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
In defense of abstract conceptual representations.为抽象概念表征辩护。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1096-108. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1.
7
The Parahippocampal Cortex Mediates Contextual Associative Memory: Evidence from an fMRI Study.海马旁皮质介导情境联想记忆:一项功能磁共振成像研究的证据。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9860604. doi: 10.1155/2016/9860604. Epub 2016 May 9.
8
Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation.通过大规模实证模拟表征的激活可能性估计的行为、敏感性和功效
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:70-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.072. Epub 2016 May 11.
9
How Localized are Language Brain Areas? A Review of Brodmann Areas Involvement in Oral Language.语言脑区的定位有多局限?对布罗德曼区域参与口语的综述。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb;31(1):112-22. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv081. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
10
Neural dynamics of object noun, action verb and action noun production in picture naming.图片命名中物体名词、动作动词和动作名词生成的神经动力学
Brain Lang. 2015 Nov;150:129-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.