Foitzik T, Eibl G, Buhr H J
Department of Surgery, Benjamin Franklin Medical Center, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 May-Jun;4(3):240-6; discussion 247. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80072-4.
Many of the complications in severe acute pancreatitis result from the amplifying effects of microcirculatory disruption. The pathogenesis of these microcirculatory disorders is multifactorial and involves various vasoactive mediators. Thus questions arise as to which vasoactive mediators are most important and how long after the onset of disease vasoactive mediator blockade may be effective. The present study compares the effect of delayed therapy with two vasoactive mediator antagonists, previously tested with promising results in other studies in a well-established rodent model of severe acute pancreatitis. Twelve hours after induction of acute pancreatitis, rats were randomized to therapy with intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) antibody (2 mg/kg IA-29), endothelin A receptor antagonist (ET-RA) (40 mg/kg LU 135252), or saline solution (volume equivalent). After 12 hours of fluid resuscitation, animals underwent repeat laparotomy for intravital microscopic determination of capillary blood flow, leukocyte rolling, and capillary permeability in the pancreas and colon. Other measurements included cardiorespiratory parameters, hematocrit, pleural effusions, ascites, urine production, and survival. Compared to saline treatment, both ICAM antibody and ET-RA significantly enhanced capillary blood flow in the pancreas and colon, reduced leukocyte rolling, and stabilized capillary permeability. These beneficial effects on microcirculation were associated with decreased fluid loss into the third space and improved renal function and survival. Although both antagonists likewise enhanced capillary blood flow and reduced leukocyte rolling, ET-RA was significantly more effective than ICAM antibody in counteracting capillary leakage, thereby further reducing fluid sequestration. The present study confirms the beneficial effects of endothelin and ICAM antagonists in severe acute pancreatitis, even with delayed therapy, suggesting that both compounds are candidates for further clinical testing. Selective endothelin A receptor blockade appears to be especially attractive for clinical use not only because it was superior to ICAM antibody in the present study but also because of its favorable pharmacologic properties and (preliminary) positive results in clinical phase 2 studies currently underway for other diseases.
重症急性胰腺炎的许多并发症源于微循环障碍的放大效应。这些微循环障碍的发病机制是多因素的,涉及多种血管活性介质。因此,出现了哪些血管活性介质最为重要以及在疾病发作后多久进行血管活性介质阻断可能有效的问题。本研究在一个成熟的重症急性胰腺炎啮齿动物模型中,比较了两种血管活性介质拮抗剂延迟治疗的效果,这两种拮抗剂在其他研究中已取得了有前景的结果。急性胰腺炎诱导12小时后,将大鼠随机分为接受细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)抗体(2mg/kg IA-29)、内皮素A受体拮抗剂(ET-RA)(40mg/kg LU 135252)或生理盐水(等量体积)治疗。液体复苏12小时后,动物再次接受剖腹手术,通过活体显微镜测定胰腺和结肠的毛细血管血流、白细胞滚动和毛细血管通透性。其他测量指标包括心肺参数、血细胞比容、胸腔积液、腹水、尿量和生存率。与生理盐水治疗相比,ICAM抗体和ET-RA均显著增强了胰腺和结肠的毛细血管血流,减少了白细胞滚动,并稳定了毛细血管通透性。这些对微循环的有益作用与进入第三间隙的液体损失减少、肾功能改善和生存率提高相关。尽管两种拮抗剂同样增强了毛细血管血流并减少了白细胞滚动,但ET-RA在对抗毛细血管渗漏方面明显比ICAM抗体更有效,从而进一步减少了液体潴留。本研究证实了内皮素和ICAM拮抗剂在重症急性胰腺炎中的有益作用,即使是延迟治疗,这表明这两种化合物都是进一步临床测试的候选药物。选择性内皮素A受体阻断在临床应用中似乎特别有吸引力,这不仅是因为在本研究中它优于ICAM抗体,还因为其良好的药理学特性以及目前正在针对其他疾病进行的2期临床研究中的(初步)阳性结果。