Eibl Guido, Buhr Heinz J, Foitzik Thomas
Department of Surgery, Benjamin Franklin Medical Center, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Feb;28(2):139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1194-1. Epub 2002 Jan 17.
To compare the effect of different vasoactive mediator antagonists in the same model of severe acute pancreatitis (AP) and to evaluate whether combinations of the agents exhibit synergistic effects.
Prospective experimental study.
Microcirculation and pancreas research laboratory at an university hospital.
Hundred eighty anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Six hours after inducing AP by intra-ductal bile salt infusion and i.v. cerulein in 168 rats, these were randomized for therapy with (1) saline, (2) endothelin receptor antagonist (ET-RA), (3) platelet activating factor receptor antagonist (PAF-RA), (4) intercellular adhesion molecule-1 antibody (ICAM-1-AB) or different combinations (5-7). After 24 h the animals underwent a second laparotomy for intra-vital microscopic determination of pancreatic and colonic capillary permeability, blood flow and leukocyte-endothelial interaction.
AP induction decreased capillary blood flow and increased permeability and leukocyte rolling. ET-RA, PAF-RA and ICAM-1-AB decreased capillary permeability, increased blood flow and reduced leukocyte rolling. ET-RA was most effective in decreasing capillary permeability in both organs as well as in increasing pancreatic capillary blood flow. Combining vasoactive mediator blockers did not further improve target parameters.
This study supports previous observations that ET-RA, PAF-RA and ICAM-1-AB improve microcirculation in AP and that ET-RA is more effective than PAF-RA or ICAM-1-AB, especially in counteracting capillary leakage. Although this may suggest that they act through different mechanisms, antagonist combinations failed to improve microcirculation further. We conclude that ET-RA is the most promising candidate for a clinical trial to reduce capillary leakage in patients with AP.
在同一重症急性胰腺炎(AP)模型中比较不同血管活性介质拮抗剂的作用,并评估这些药物联合使用是否具有协同效应。
前瞻性实验研究。
一所大学医院的微循环与胰腺研究实验室。
180只麻醉的雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠。
通过向168只大鼠经导管注入胆盐和静脉注射雨蛙素诱导AP 6小时后,将这些大鼠随机分为以下几组进行治疗:(1)生理盐水组;(2)内皮素受体拮抗剂(ET-RA)组;(3)血小板活化因子受体拮抗剂(PAF-RA)组;(4)细胞间黏附分子-1抗体(ICAM-1-AB)组或不同组合组(5-7)。24小时后,对动物进行第二次剖腹手术,以进行胰腺和结肠毛细血管通透性、血流及白细胞与内皮细胞相互作用的活体显微镜测定。
诱导AP后,毛细血管血流减少,通透性增加,白细胞滚动增加。ET-RA、PAF-RA和ICAM-1-AB可降低毛细血管通透性,增加血流并减少白细胞滚动。ET-RA在降低两个器官的毛细血管通透性以及增加胰腺毛细血管血流方面最为有效。联合使用血管活性介质阻滞剂并未进一步改善目标参数。
本研究支持先前的观察结果,即ET-RA、PAF-RA和ICAM-1-AB可改善AP中的微循环,且ET-RA比PAF-RA或ICAM-1-AB更有效,尤其是在对抗毛细血管渗漏方面。虽然这可能表明它们通过不同机制起作用,但拮抗剂联合使用未能进一步改善微循环。我们得出结论,ET-RA是减少AP患者毛细血管渗漏的临床试验中最有前景的候选药物。