• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危新生儿与正常新生儿的听觉脑干反应

Auditory brainstem responses in high risk and normal newborns.

作者信息

Chadha S, Bais A S

机构信息

Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Nov-Dec;64(6):777-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02725499.

DOI:10.1007/BF02725499
PMID:10771920
Abstract

We studied the auditory brainstem responses of 50 high risk neonates from NICU and compared with those of 25 normal neonates in order to determine the percentage of significant auditory impairment in NICU and correlated it to various risk factors. Infants with the risk factors of low birth weight, hyperbilirubinemia, asphyxia, septicemia and meningitis were included in the study group. All the 150 ears were tested at 4 intensities 30 dB, 46 dB, 60 dB and 75 dB. The study recorded prolongation of latency of wave V and I-V Interwave interval in the study group with a statistically significant difference denoting an impaired condition. Incidence of significant auditory impairment was 18%. On follow up at 6 months incidence of persistent auditory abnormality was 4%. On the basis of this study it is suggested that all high risk neonates should undergo screening for hearing impairment.

摘要

我们研究了50名来自新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的高危新生儿的听觉脑干反应,并与25名正常新生儿的反应进行比较,以确定NICU中严重听觉障碍的百分比,并将其与各种风险因素相关联。研究组纳入了具有低出生体重、高胆红素血症、窒息、败血症和脑膜炎等风险因素的婴儿。对所有150只耳朵在30 dB、46 dB、60 dB和75 dB这4种强度下进行了测试。研究记录了研究组中V波潜伏期和I-V波间期的延长,差异具有统计学意义,表明存在受损情况。严重听觉障碍的发生率为18%。在6个月的随访中,持续性听觉异常的发生率为4%。基于这项研究,建议所有高危新生儿都应接受听力障碍筛查。

相似文献

1
Auditory brainstem responses in high risk and normal newborns.高危新生儿与正常新生儿的听觉脑干反应
Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Nov-Dec;64(6):777-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02725499.
2
Hearing assessment by brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in neonates at risk.对有风险的新生儿进行脑干听觉诱发电位(BAER)听力评估。
Indian Pediatr. 1991 Oct;28(10):1175-83.
3
Changes in brainstem auditory evoked response latencies in term neonates with hyperbilirubinemia.足月新生儿高胆红素血症患儿脑干听觉诱发电位潜伏期的变化。
Pediatr Neurol. 2007 Jul;37(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.03.006.
4
Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.上海新生儿重症监护病房两种听力筛查方案的效果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
[Early detection of hearing impairment in high-risk infants of NICU].[新生儿重症监护病房高危婴儿听力障碍的早期检测]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2003 May;41(5):357-9.
6
The effects of hypoxia, premature birth, infection, ototoxic drugs, circulatory system and congenital disease on neonatal hearing loss.缺氧、早产、感染、耳毒性药物、循环系统及先天性疾病对新生儿听力损失的影响。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004 Dec;31(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2004.07.007.
7
Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.高危新生儿听力筛查的可靠性:耳声发射、自动和传统听性脑干反应的比较研究
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;118(4):869-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
8
[Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in healthy and at risk neonates].[健康及高危新生儿的脑干听觉诱发电位]
Lijec Vjesn. 1994 Nov-Dec;116(11-12):301-2.
9
Prevalence and risk factors for auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in a screened newborn population at risk for hearing loss.听力损失高危筛查新生儿群体中听觉神经病谱系障碍的患病率及危险因素
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Nov;76(11):1668-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
10
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in newborn infants born in a high-altitude area.高原地区新生儿脑干听觉诱发电位。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2023 Oct 1;121(5):e202202809. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022-02809.eng. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Hearing in High Risk Infants, Using Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry.使用脑干听觉诱发电位听力测定法评估高危婴儿的听力。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep;73(3):383-388. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02363-1. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Prevalence of Hearing Loss in High Risk Infants of Mediocre Socio-economic Background at Around One Year of Age and Their Correlation with Risk Factors.社会经济背景一般的高危婴儿一岁左右听力损失的患病率及其与风险因素的相关性。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;65(Suppl 3):598-603. doi: 10.1007/s12070-012-0580-z. Epub 2012 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrasts in brainstem function between normal and high-risk infants in early postnatal life.出生后早期正常婴儿与高危婴儿脑干功能的对比。
Early Hum Dev. 1980 Jun;4(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(80)90021-3.
2
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) evaluates risk factors for hearing loss in the newborn.听觉脑干反应(ABR)用于评估新生儿听力损失的风险因素。
Pediatr Res. 1980 Feb;14(2):159-63. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198002000-00019.
3
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a useful diagnostic tool in the intensive care nursery.
Pediatr Res. 1980 Feb;14(2):154-8. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198002000-00018.
4
Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in high-risk neonates.
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1982 Sep;71(5):711-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1982.tb09508.x.
5
Longitudinal ABR in the NICU infant.新生儿重症监护病房婴儿的纵向听觉脑干反应
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1982 Aug;4(3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(82)90004-0.
6
A neonatal hearing screening research program using brainstem electric response audiometry.
J Otolaryngol. 1984 Feb;13(1):49-54.
7
Auditory brainstem response in NICU infants.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1984 Dec;8(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(84)80064-6.
8
Maturation of the auditory brain stem response (ABR): additional perspectives.听觉脑干反应(ABR)的成熟:其他观点
Ear Hear. 1984 Nov-Dec;5(6):361-5. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198411000-00008.
9
Hearing threshold in preterm and term infants by auditory brainstem response.通过听觉脑干反应评估早产儿和足月儿的听力阈值。
J Pediatr. 1985 Oct;107(4):593-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80030-5.
10
Newborn auditory brainstem evoked responses (ABRs): prenatal and contemporary correlates.新生儿听觉脑干诱发电位(ABR):产前及当代相关因素
Child Dev. 1988 Jun;59(3):571-88.