Suppr超能文献

加强流感疫苗接种。明信片和电话提醒以及接种地点变更带来的挑战。

Enhancing influenza immunization. Postcard and telephone reminders and the challenge of immunization site shift.

作者信息

Kellerman R D, Allred C T, Frisch L E

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, USA.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 2000 Apr;9(4):368-72. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.4.368.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if postcard and telephone reminders increased the rate of influenza immunization of Medicare beneficiaries.

DESIGN

Before and after trial (postcard reminders) with systematically allocated control group (telephone reminder intervention).

SETTING

A semirural family practice residency program.

PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS

All 475 noninstitutionalized persons older than 65 years who had received at least 1 office service in the previous 2 years.

INTERVENTION

In September 1996, each of 475 patients received a postcard urging prompt influenza immunization. Those not responding within 1 month were systematically allocated either to a group receiving further telephone contact or to a control group. At the time of telephone contact, any offered information about influenza immunization received outside the Smoky Hill Family Practice Center, Salina, Kan, was recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured the percentage of change in practice-administered influenza immunizations compared with the baseline rate of the preceding 2 years; the difference in immunization rates between the telephone intervention group and controls; and the number of patients contacted by telephone who reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight percent of patients who received a postcard obtained office influenza immunizations within 1 month, but no additional immunizations could be attributed to the telephone intervention. Thirty-five percent of patients contacted by telephone reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center.

CONCLUSIONS

The postcard intervention was associated with a significant increase in the office immunization rate. This increase may have been confounded by "site shift" in which individuals came to the office for an immunization that they might otherwise have received at other community sites.

摘要

目的

确定明信片和电话提醒是否能提高医疗保险受益人的流感疫苗接种率。

设计

采用前后对照试验(明信片提醒),并设有系统分配的对照组(电话提醒干预)。

地点

一个半农村家庭医疗住院医师培训项目。

患者及其他参与者

所有475名65岁以上的非住院患者,他们在过去两年中至少接受过1次门诊服务。

干预措施

1996年9月,475名患者每人收到一张敦促及时接种流感疫苗的明信片。1个月内未回复的患者被系统地分配到接受进一步电话联系的组或对照组。在电话联系时,记录患者在堪萨斯州萨利纳市斯莫基希尔家庭医疗中心以外的地方获得的任何有关流感疫苗接种的信息。

主要观察指标

我们测量了与前两年基线率相比,实际进行的流感疫苗接种的变化百分比;电话干预组和对照组之间的疫苗接种率差异;以及通过电话联系的患者中报告在家庭医疗中心以外的地点接种流感疫苗的人数。

结果

收到明信片的患者中有28%在1个月内获得了门诊流感疫苗接种,但电话干预没有带来额外的接种。通过电话联系的患者中有35%报告在家庭医疗中心以外的地点接种了流感疫苗。

结论

明信片干预与门诊疫苗接种率的显著提高相关。这种提高可能因“地点转移”而受到混淆,即个体原本可能在其他社区地点接种疫苗,现在来到门诊接种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验