• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.提高社区60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 7;2014(7):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub3.
2
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.提高社区60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub4.
3
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.提高社区60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub2.
4
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
5
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
6
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
7
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6.
8
Influenza vaccines in immunosuppressed adults with cancer.癌症免疫抑制成人中的流感疫苗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD008983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008983.pub3.
9
Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.用于预防老年人流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub4.
10
Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies.用于预防血液系统恶性肿瘤成人感染的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing influenza in Bangladesh: closing evidence and policy gaps with strategic interventions.应对孟加拉国的流感:通过战略干预缩小证据与政策差距
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 May 19;37:100592. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100592. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Promoting Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Chinese Older Adults Based on Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model and Conditional Economic Incentive: Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial.基于信息-动机-行为技能模型和有条件经济激励措施促进中国老年人接种流感疫苗:随机对照试验方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;12(23):2361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232361.
3
Enhancing COVID-19 booster vaccination among the elderly through text message reminders.通过短信提醒提高老年人的新冠病毒加强针接种率。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2375665. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2375665. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Low Levels of Influenza Vaccine Uptake among the Diabetic Population in Spain: A Time Trend Study from 2011 to 2020.西班牙糖尿病患者群体中流感疫苗接种率较低:一项2011年至2020年的时间趋势研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 23;11(1):68. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010068.
5
Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Tool for Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in England.开发和验证英格兰季节性流感疫苗接种的临床预测工具。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207743. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7743.
6
Trends, Coverage and Influencing Determinants of Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly: A Population-Based National Survey in Spain (2006-2017).老年人流感疫苗接种的趋势、覆盖率及影响因素:西班牙基于人群的全国性调查(2006 - 2017年)
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Jun 19;8(2):327. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020327.
7
Increasing Influenza Vaccination Rates in People With Chronic Illness.提高慢性病患者的流感疫苗接种率。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Sep 27;116(39):645-652. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0645.
8
Improving the vaccination status of liver transplant patients: Effectiveness of personally addressing patients and written recommendations to family physicians after 3 years.提高肝移植患者的疫苗接种率:3年后亲自与患者沟通及向家庭医生提供书面建议的效果
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;21(5):e13140. doi: 10.1111/tid.13140. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review.为初级保健中的慢性病制定新的临床治理框架:一项综合综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e020626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020626.
10
Impact of European vaccination policies on seasonal influenza vaccination coverage rates: An update seven years later.欧洲疫苗接种政策对季节性流感疫苗接种覆盖率的影响:七年后的更新。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2706-2714. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1489948. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.提高免疫接种率的患者提醒与召回干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD003941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3.
2
Pharmacy-based Immunization in Rural Communities Strategy (PhICS): A community cluster-randomized trial.农村社区基于药房的免疫策略(PhICS):一项社区整群随机试验。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jan;147(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/1715163513514020.
3
Impact of education program on influenza vaccination rates in Spain.教育计划对西班牙流感疫苗接种率的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Dec 1;18(12):e446-52.
4
Interventions to improve influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates among community-dwelling adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施提高社区居住成年人流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;10(6):538-46. doi: 10.1370/afm.1405.
5
Impact of the demand for 'proxy assent' on recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of vaccination testing in care homes.“代理同意”需求对养老院疫苗接种试验随机对照研究招募的影响。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100119. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
6
What components of chronic care organisation relate to better primary care for coronary heart disease patients? An observational study.慢性护理组织的哪些组成部分与为冠心病患者提供更好的初级护理相关?一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 17;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001344. Print 2012.
7
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
8
A short-term, multicomponent infection control program in nursing homes: a cluster randomized controlled trial.养老院内短期、多组分感染控制方案:一项群组随机对照试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):569.e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
9
The FLU-FOBT Program in community clinics: durable benefits of a randomized controlled trial.社区诊所中的 FLU-FOBT 项目:一项随机对照试验的持久获益。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Oct;27(5):886-94. doi: 10.1093/her/cys063. Epub 2012 May 28.
10
Improving adult immunization practices using a team approach in the primary care setting.在基层医疗环境中采用团队方法改进成人免疫接种实践。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):e46-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300665. Epub 2012 May 17.

提高社区60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施。

Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.

作者信息

Thomas Roger E, Lorenzetti Diane L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, UCMC, #1707-1632 14th Avenue, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2M 1N7.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 7;2014(7):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub3
PMID:24999919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6464876/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of influenza vaccination in people aged 60 and older is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess access, provider, system and societal interventions to increase the uptake of influenza vaccination in people aged 60 years and older in the community.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE (January 1950 to May week 3 2014), EMBASE (1980 to June 2014), AgeLine (1978 to 4 June 2014), ERIC (1965 to June 2014) and CINAHL (1982 to June 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to increase influenza vaccination uptake in people aged 60 and older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted influenza vaccine uptake data.

MAIN RESULTS

This update identified 13 new RCTs; the review now includes a total of 57 RCTs with 896,531 participants. The trials included community-dwelling seniors in high-income countries. Heterogeneity limited meta-analysis. The percentage of trials with low risk of bias for each domain was as follows: randomisation (33%); allocation concealment (11%); blinding (44%); missing data (49%) and selective reporting (100%). Increasing community demand (32 trials, 10 strategies)The interventions with a statistically significant result were: three trials (n = 64,200) of letter plus leaflet/postcard compared to letter (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.15); two trials (n = 614) of nurses/pharmacists educating plus vaccinating patients (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.91 to 5.66); single trials of a phone call from a senior (n = 193) (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.79 to 6.22), a telephone invitation versus clinic drop-in (n = 243) (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.55 to 4.76), a free groceries lottery (n = 291) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.76) and nurses educating and vaccinating patients (n = 485) (OR 152.95, 95% CI 9.39 to 2490.67).We did not pool the following trials due to considerable heterogeneity: postcard/letter/pamphlets (16 trials, n = 592,165); tailored communications (16 trials, n = 388,164); customised letter/phone-call (four trials, n = 82,465) and client-based appraisals (three trials, n = 4016), although several trials showed the interventions were effective. Enhancing vaccination access (10 trials, six strategies)The interventions with a statistically significant result were: two trials (n = 2112) of home visits compared to clinic invitation (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.61); two trials (n = 2251) of free vaccine (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.82) and one trial (n = 321) of patient group visits (OR 24.85, 95% CI 1.45 to 425.32). One trial (n = 350) of a home visit plus vaccine encouragement compared to a home visit plus safety advice was non-significant.We did not pool the following trials due to considerable heterogeneity: nurse home visits (two trials, n = 2069) and free vaccine compared to no intervention (two trials, n = 2250). Provider- or system-based interventions (17 trials, 11 strategies)The interventions with a statistically significant result were: two trials (n = 2815) of paying physicians (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.77); one trial (n = 316) of reminding physicians about all their patients (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.99); one trial (n = 8376) of posters plus postcards (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.22); one trial (n = 1360) of chart review/feedback (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.37 to 4.97) and one trial (n = 27,580) of educational outreach/feedback (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.81).Trials of posters plus postcards versus posters (n = 5753), academic detailing (n = 1400) and increasing staff vaccination rates (n = 26,432) were non-significant.We did not pool the following trials due to considerable heterogeneity: reminding physicians (four trials, n = 202,264) and practice facilitators (three trials, n = 2183), although several trials showed the interventions were effective. Interventions at the societal level We identified no RCTs of interventions at the societal level.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are interventions that are effective for increasing community demand for vaccination, enhancing access and improving provider/system response. Heterogeneity limited pooling of trials.

摘要

背景

提高60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施效果尚不确定。

目的

评估在社区中提高60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的获取、提供者、系统和社会层面的干预措施。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(2014年第5期)、医学期刊数据库(1950年1月至2014年第3周)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2014年6月)、老年医学数据库(1978年至2014年6月4日)、教育资源信息中心数据库(1965年至2014年6月)和护理学与健康领域数据库(1982年至2014年6月)。

入选标准

提高60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者独立评估研究质量并提取流感疫苗接种数据。

主要结果

本次更新纳入了13项新的随机对照试验;该综述现共纳入57项随机对照试验,涉及896,531名参与者。试验纳入了高收入国家的社区老年人。异质性限制了荟萃分析。各领域偏倚风险较低的试验所占百分比分别为:随机化(33%);分配隐藏(11%);盲法(44%);数据缺失(49%)和选择性报告(100%)。

增加社区需求(32项试验,10种策略)

具有统计学显著结果的干预措施有

三项试验(n = 64,200)比较信件加传单/明信片与信件(比值比(OR)1.11,95%置信区间(CI)1.07至1.15);两项试验(n = 614)比较护士/药剂师对患者进行教育并接种疫苗(OR 3.29,95% CI 1.91至5.66);单项试验分别为老年人打电话(n = 193)(OR 3.33,95% CI 1.79至6.22)、电话邀请与门诊预约(n = 243)(OR 2.72,95% CI 1.55至4.76)、免费食品杂货抽奖(n = 291)(OR 1.04,95% CI 0.62至1.76)以及护士对患者进行教育并接种疫苗(n = 485)(OR 152.95,95% CI 9.39至2490.67)。

由于异质性较大,我们未对以下试验进行合并:明信片/信件/宣传册(16项试验,n = 592,165);针对性沟通(16项试验,n = 388,164);定制信件/电话(4项试验,n = 82,465)以及基于客户的评估(3项试验,n = 4016),尽管有多项试验表明这些干预措施有效。

增强疫苗接种可及性(10项试验,6种策略)

具有统计学显著结果的干预措施有

两项试验(n = 2112)比较家访与门诊邀请(OR 1.30,95% CI 1.05至1.61);两项试验(n = 2251)比较免费疫苗(OR 2.36,95% CI 1.98至2.82);一项试验(n = 321)比较患者小组就诊(OR 24.85,95% CI 1.45至425.32)。一项试验(n = 350)比较家访加疫苗鼓励与家访加安全建议,结果无统计学意义。

由于异质性较大,我们未对以下试验进行合并:护士家访(2项试验,n = 2069)以及免费疫苗与无干预措施比较(2项试验,n = 2250)。

基于提供者或系统的干预措施(17项试验,11种策略)

具有统计学显著结果的干预措施有

两项试验(n = 2815)比较支付医生费用(OR 2.22,95% CI 1.77至2.77);一项试验(n = 316)比较提醒医生关注所有患者(OR 2.47,95% CI 1.53至3.99);一项试验(n = 8376)比较海报加明信片(OR 2.03,95% CI 1.86至2.22);一项试验(n = 1360)比较图表审查/反馈(OR 3.43,95% CI 2.37至4.97);一项试验(n = 27,580)比较教育推广/反馈(OR 0.77,95% CI 0.72至0.81)。

海报加明信片与海报比较(n = 5753)、学术推广(n = 1400)以及提高工作人员疫苗接种率(n = 26,432)的试验结果无统计学意义。

由于异质性较大,我们未对以下试验进行合并:提醒医生(4项试验,n = 202,264)以及实践促进者(3项试验,n = 2183),尽管有多项试验表明这些干预措施有效。

社会层面的干预措施

我们未发现社会层面干预措施的随机对照试验。

作者结论

存在一些干预措施可有效增加社区对疫苗接种的需求、增强可及性并改善提供者/系统的反应。异质性限制了试验的合并。