Placebo-controlled trials: good science or medical neglect?
作者信息
Chiodo G T, Tolle S W, Bevan L
机构信息
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3097, USA.
出版信息
West J Med. 2000 Apr;172(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.4.271.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Placebo-controlled trials: good science or medical neglect?安慰剂对照试验：是良好的科学还是医疗疏忽？
West J Med. 2000 Apr;172(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.4.271.
2
Placebo mania.安慰剂狂热
BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):3-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.3a.
3
Informed consent for a clinical trial in Thailand.泰国一项临床试验的知情同意书。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 29;339(18):1331-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810293391815.
4
Confusion over use of placebos in clinical trials.临床试验中安慰剂使用方面的困惑。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 30;311(7009):821-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7009.821.
5
World Medical Association clarifies rules on placebo controlled trials.世界医学协会阐明了关于安慰剂对照试验的规则。
BMJ. 2001 Oct 13;323(7317):825. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7317.825.
6
Randomised placebo controlled trials in HIV infection: to be or not to be?HIV感染的随机安慰剂对照试验：何去何从？
Genitourin Med. 1989 Jun;65(3):143-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.65.3.143.
7
Placebo-controlled trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 3;135(1):62-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00022.
8
The ethics of placebo-controlled trials.安慰剂对照试验的伦理学
Can J Psychiatry. 1995 May;40(4):165-6. doi: 10.1177/070674379504000401.
9
Placebo mania. Placebos are essential when extent and variability of placebo response are unknown.安慰剂狂热。当安慰剂反应的程度和变异性未知时，安慰剂至关重要。
BMJ. 1996 Oct 19;313(7063):1008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.1008a.
10
The ethics of clinical research in the Third World.第三世界国家的临床研究伦理
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 18;337(12):847-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371209.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical and secure evidence generation from regionwide clinical data through a collaborative environment for advancing predictive care.通过协作环境从区域范围内的临床数据中生成符合伦理且安全的证据，以推进预测性医疗。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 8;13:1630351. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1630351. eCollection 2025.
2
A Framework for the Use and Likelihood of Regulatory Acceptance of Single-Arm Trials.用于监管机构接受单臂试验的可能性和使用的框架。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Nov;58(6):1214-1232. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00693-8. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods.科学指南评估法医特征比较方法的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301843120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301843120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials - A Primer for Researchers.临床试验中的合成对照与外部对照——研究人员入门指南
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May 8;12:457-467. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S242097. eCollection 2020.
5
Efficacy of a 3C-like protease inhibitor in treating various forms of acquired feline infectious peritonitis.一种类3C蛋白酶抑制剂治疗各种形式猫传染性腹膜炎的疗效
J Feline Med Surg. 2018 Apr;20(4):378-392. doi: 10.1177/1098612X17729626. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
6
Comparing antibiotic treatment for leptospirosis using network meta-analysis: a tutorial.使用网络荟萃分析比较钩端螺旋体病的抗生素治疗：教程
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2145-3.
本文引用的文献
1
Problems in interpreting active control equivalence trials.解释活性对照等效性试验中的问题。
Account Res. 1996;4(3-4):267-75. doi: 10.1080/08989629608573887.
2
Placebo-controlled studies in rheumatoid arthritis: ethical issues.类风湿关节炎的安慰剂对照研究：伦理问题。
Lancet. 1999 Jan 30;353(9150):400-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01373-7.
3
Professional integrity in clinical research.临床研究中的职业操守。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 28;280(16):1449-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.16.1449.
4
Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research.信任，当代生物医学研究的脆弱基石。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):25-9.
5
The continuing unethical use of placebo controls.安慰剂对照的持续不道德使用。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):394-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310611.
6
Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.参与I期试验的癌症患者及其医生的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1062-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1062.
7
Ethics and clinical research.伦理与临床研究
N Engl J Med. 1966 Jun 16;274(24):1354-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196606162742405.
8
False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.虚假的希望与最佳数据：研究同意与治疗性误解
Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Apr;17(2):20-4.
Zotero 插件