• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨关节炎患者对非甾体抗炎药与对乙酰氨基酚的偏好以及两种药物的联合使用情况

Preference for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus acetaminophen and concomitant use of both types of drugs in patients with osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Pincus T, Swearingen C, Cummins P, Callahan L F

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2000 Apr;27(4):1020-7.

PMID:10782831
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze results of treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with acetaminophen and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) through a patient survey.

METHODS

A 15 minute telephone survey was conducted with 300 patients, including 172 with confirmed OA.

RESULTS

Twenty-four percent of patients who took acetaminophen rated it as "very helpful," compared to 31% for ibuprofen, 30% for naproxen, and 56% for diclofenac. Drug continuation beyond 24 months was reported by 33% of patients for acetaminophen, 21% for ibuprofen, 17% for naproxen, and 19% for diclofenac. Acetaminophen was significantly less likely to be discontinued because of toxicity than NSAID. Patients who indicated that they would not take a drug again, and therefore be unlikely to participate in a clinical trial involving this drug, were 26% for acetaminophen, 40% for ibuprofen, 38% for naproxen, and 28% for diclofenac. About 30% of patients who took acetaminophen reported concurrent use of ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac. Among the 67% of patients who identified a drug as "most helpful," 80% named an NSAID, compared to 20% who named acetaminophen or another analgesic as the "most helpful" drug.

CONCLUSION

Patients take many different drugs for OA, most of which are not continued beyond 2 years. Many patients take both acetaminophen and an NSAID. Most patients who identified a drug as "most helpful" named an NSAID rather than acetaminophen or an analgesic drug. These findings may be of value in further development of management strategies and guidelines for OA.

摘要

目的

通过患者调查分析对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗骨关节炎(OA)的效果。

方法

对300名患者进行了15分钟的电话调查,其中172名确诊为OA。

结果

服用对乙酰氨基酚的患者中有24%将其评为“非常有效”,布洛芬为31%,萘普生为30%,双氯芬酸为56%。33%服用对乙酰氨基酚的患者报告用药持续超过24个月,布洛芬为21%,萘普生为17%,双氯芬酸为19%。与NSAID相比,对乙酰氨基酚因毒性而停药的可能性显著更低。表示不会再次服用某种药物,因此不太可能参与涉及该药物的临床试验的患者,服用对乙酰氨基酚的为26%,布洛芬为40%,萘普生为38%,双氯芬酸为28%。约30%服用对乙酰氨基酚的患者报告同时使用了布洛芬、萘普生或双氯芬酸。在67%认为某种药物“最有效”的患者中,80%提到了一种NSAID,相比之下,20%将对乙酰氨基酚或另一种镇痛药列为“最有效”药物。

结论

患者针对OA服用多种不同药物,其中大多数用药时间不超过2年。许多患者同时服用对乙酰氨基酚和一种NSAID。大多数认为某种药物“最有效 ”的患者提到的是NSAID,而非对乙酰氨基酚或镇痛药。这些发现可能对OA管理策略和指南的进一步制定具有价值。

相似文献

1
Preference for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus acetaminophen and concomitant use of both types of drugs in patients with osteoarthritis.骨关节炎患者对非甾体抗炎药与对乙酰氨基酚的偏好以及两种药物的联合使用情况
J Rheumatol. 2000 Apr;27(4):1020-7.
2
The efficacy and cost effectiveness of N of 1 studies with diclofenac compared to standard treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis.与骨关节炎中使用非甾体抗炎药的标准治疗相比,双氯芬酸单病例研究的疗效和成本效益。
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):140-9.
3
Patient preference in a crossover clinical trial of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: face validity of self-report questionnaire ratings.膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎患者交叉临床试验中的患者偏好:自我报告问卷评分的表面效度
J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar;32(3):533-9.
4
Valdecoxib is associated with improved dyspepsia-related health compared with nonspecific NSAIDs in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.与非特异性非甾体抗炎药相比,伐地昔布可改善骨关节炎或类风湿关节炎患者与消化不良相关的健康状况。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;100(5):1043-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40701.x.
5
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group trial of the long-term (6-12 months) safety of acetaminophen in adult patients with osteoarthritis.对骨关节炎成年患者进行对乙酰氨基酚长期(6 - 12个月)安全性的多中心、随机、双盲、活性药物对照、平行组试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):222-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.004.
6
Etoricoxib: new drug. Avoid using cox-2 inhibitors for pain.依托考昔:新药。避免使用环氧化酶-2抑制剂止痛。
Prescrire Int. 2007 Dec;16(92):223-7.
7
Evaluation of gastric tolerability, antinociceptive and antiinflammatory activity of combination NSAIDs in rats.大鼠中联合使用非甾体抗炎药的胃耐受性、抗伤害感受和抗炎活性评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Oct-Dec;20(4):418-22. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.59439.
8
A randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial of diclofenac plus misoprostol versus acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.双氯芬酸加米索前列醇与对乙酰氨基酚治疗髋或膝骨关节炎患者的随机、双盲、交叉临床试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Jul;44(7):1587-98. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200107)44:7<1587::AID-ART282>3.0.CO;2-X.
9
Diclofenac/misoprostol: the European clinical experience.双氯芬酸/米索前列醇:欧洲临床经验
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1998 May;51:21-30.
10
Celecoxib versus naproxen and diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients: SUCCESS-I Study.塞来昔布与萘普生和双氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎患者的比较:SUCCESS-I研究
Am J Med. 2006 Mar;119(3):255-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.054.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review on Osteoarthritis and its Eradication Approaches: An Update.骨关节炎及其根除方法综述:最新进展
Curr Drug Res Rev. 2024 Jan 26. doi: 10.2174/0125899775267865231115051056.
2
Cost-effectiveness of generic celecoxib in knee osteoarthritis for average-risk patients: a model-based evaluation.通用塞来昔布治疗普通风险膝骨关节炎的成本效果分析:基于模型的评估。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 May;26(5):641-650. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.898. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Practice guidelines for pharmacists: The management of osteoarthritis.
药剂师实践指南:骨关节炎的管理
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2017 May 1;150(3):156-168. doi: 10.1177/1715163517702168. eCollection 2017 May-Jun.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Therapy in Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.塞来昔布治疗骨关节炎的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(20):e3585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003585.
5
Managing osteoarthritis.骨关节炎的管理
Aust Prescr. 2015 Aug;38(4):115-9. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2015.039. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
6
A Review on the Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.髋膝关节骨关节炎管理综述
Int J Chronic Dis. 2013;2013:845015. doi: 10.1155/2013/845015. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
7
Long-term frequent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might protect patients with ankylosing spondylitis from cardiovascular diseases: a nationwide case-control study.长期频繁使用非甾体抗炎药可能会使强直性脊柱炎患者免受心血管疾病困扰:一项全国性病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0126347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126347. eCollection 2015.
8
A group-randomized trial of shared decision making for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug risk awareness: primary results and lessons learned.一项关于非甾体抗炎药风险认知共同决策的群组随机试验:主要结果与经验教训
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):638-48. doi: 10.1111/jep.12193. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
Applying the evidence in osteoarthritis: strategies for pain management.将证据应用于骨关节炎:疼痛管理策略。
Clin Drug Investig. 2007 Dec;27 Suppl 1:23-9. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727001-00005.
10
Treatment satisfaction after switching to another therapy in Spanish orthopaedic clinic outpatients with knee or hip osteoarthritis previously refractory to paracetamol.在西班牙矫形科门诊中,对于先前对扑热息痛难治的膝或髋骨关节炎患者,转换为另一种治疗方法后的治疗满意度。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Oct 1;32(10):685-95. doi: 10.1007/BF03261922.