Manns J R, Clark R E, Squire L R
Department of Psychology, University of California at San Diego, USA.
Hippocampus. 2000;10(2):181-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(2000)10:2<181::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-V.
Studies of differential eyeblink conditioning (CS+ and CS-) have demonstrated that successful conditioning requires awareness of the stimulus contingencies and that delay conditioning does not. Two experiments were carried out to determine whether awareness is also important for single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning. In experiment 1, participants who performed a secondary, attention-demanding task emitted significantly fewer conditioned eyeblink responses than participants who watched a silent movie during the conditioning session. In experiment 2, participants who became aware of the stimulus contingencies early in the conditioning session emitted significantly more conditioned responses during the remainder of the session than participants who became aware later in the session or who never became aware. These results indicate that awareness is important for single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning, just as it is for differential trace conditioning. The relationship between awareness and trace eyeblink conditioning is discussed in the light of these and other recent findings.
对差异眨眼条件反射(CS+和CS-)的研究表明,成功的条件反射需要对刺激的偶然性有所意识,而延迟条件反射则不需要。进行了两项实验,以确定意识对于单线索痕迹眨眼条件反射是否也很重要。在实验1中,执行一项次要的、需要注意力的任务的参与者比在条件反射训练期间观看无声电影的参与者产生的条件性眨眼反应明显更少。在实验2中,在条件反射训练早期意识到刺激偶然性的参与者在训练的剩余时间内产生的条件性反应比在训练后期才意识到或从未意识到的参与者明显更多。这些结果表明,意识对于单线索痕迹眨眼条件反射很重要,就像对差异痕迹条件反射一样。根据这些以及其他最近的研究结果,讨论了意识与痕迹眨眼条件反射之间的关系。