• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对威胁:半球不对称性与输入信息的半球间划分

Responding to threat: hemispheric asymmetries and interhemispheric division of input.

作者信息

Compton R J, Heller W, Banich M T, Palmieri P A, Miller G A

机构信息

Department of Psychology and The Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2000 Apr;14(2):254-64. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.14.2.254.

DOI:10.1037//0894-4105.14.2.254
PMID:10791865
Abstract

This investigation examined how hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric processing contribute to attentional biases toward emotional information. Participants (n = 88) named the color of lateralized squares presented concurrently with neutral, positive, or threatening words. A left-hemisphere advantage in color naming was reduced when distractors were emotional, suggesting right-hemisphere priming by emotional stimuli. Furthermore, the advantage of dividing the word and color across visual fields was increased for emotion words when they were frequently presented, indicating a strategic use of interhemispheric division of labor to reduce the distracting effect of emotional words. Finally, participants with high levels of anxious apprehension were most likely to make use of this interhemispheric processing strategy, supporting a processing efficiency theory of cognitive function in anxiety.

摘要

本研究考察了半球不对称性和半球间加工如何导致对情绪信息的注意偏向。参与者(n = 88)命名与中性、积极或威胁性词语同时呈现的侧向方块的颜色。当干扰物带有情绪色彩时,颜色命名中的左半球优势会减弱,这表明情绪刺激会启动右半球。此外,当情绪词频繁呈现时,跨视野呈现词语和颜色的优势会增加,这表明人们会策略性地利用半球间的分工来减少情绪词的干扰作用。最后,焦虑担忧程度高的参与者最有可能利用这种半球间加工策略,这支持了焦虑中认知功能的加工效率理论。

相似文献

1
Responding to threat: hemispheric asymmetries and interhemispheric division of input.应对威胁:半球不对称性与输入信息的半球间划分
Neuropsychology. 2000 Apr;14(2):254-64. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.14.2.254.
2
Effects of characterological anxiety and situational arousal on the solving of a color-word interference task: hemispheric processing implications.性格焦虑和情境唤醒对颜色-词干扰任务解决的影响:半球加工的意义。
Int J Neurosci. 1990 May;52(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.3109/00207459008994237.
3
Focus on the positive: anxiety modulates the effects of emotional stimuli on hemispheric attention.关注积极面:焦虑调节情绪刺激对半球注意的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Oct;83(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
4
[Hemispheric asymmetry of the P300 wave to unrecognized emotional words].[P300波对未识别情绪词汇的半球不对称性]
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1980 May-Jun;30(3):467-75.
5
Lateralized lexical decision in schizophrenia: hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric lexicality priming.精神分裂症中的偏侧化词汇判断:半球特化与半球间词汇启动
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):623-32. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.623.
6
An examination of the right-hemisphere hypothesis of the lateralization of emotion.对情绪偏侧化的右半球假说的审视。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Mar;57(2):210-3. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.046.
7
Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information?焦虑会导致对威胁相关信息的选择性加工吗?
Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(2):147-60. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90043-3.
8
Hemispheric asymmetry in the efficiency of attentional networks.注意网络效率的半球不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Jul;79(2):117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
[Hemisphere asymmetry in repetitive priming and associative priming].[重复启动和联想启动中的半球不对称性]
Z Exp Psychol. 1999;46(4):265-74.
10
Anxiety and speaking in people who stutter: an investigation using the emotional Stroop task.口吃者的焦虑与言语表达:一项运用情绪斯特鲁普任务的调查
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the online version of the Trier Social Stress Test to investigate the effect of acute stress on functional lateralization.使用在线版特里尔社会压力测试来研究急性应激对功能侧化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 6;14(1):20826. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71668-w.
2
Anxiety is not the right choice! Individual differences in trait anxiety modulate biases in pseudoneglect.焦虑并非正确选择!特质焦虑的个体差异调节了假性忽视中的偏差。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Aug 2;17:1201898. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201898. eCollection 2023.
3
Abnormal Functional Connectivity Between the Left Medial Superior Frontal Gyrus and Amygdala Underlying Abnormal Emotion and Premature Ejaculation: A Resting State fMRI Study.
左侧额上回内侧与杏仁核之间的异常功能连接是异常情绪和早泄的基础:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 29;15:704920. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.704920. eCollection 2021.
4
Further to the Left: Stress-Induced Increase of Spatial Pseudoneglect During the COVID-19 Lockdown.向左偏移加剧:新冠疫情封锁期间压力导致空间假性忽视增加
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:573846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573846. eCollection 2021.
5
Stress Reactivity as a Pathway from Attentional Control Deficits in Everyday Life to Depressive Symptoms in Adolescent Girls.日常生活中注意力控制缺陷与青少年女性抑郁症状的关系:应激反应的作用途径。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Apr;46(3):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0318-1.
6
Differential functional connectivity of rostral anterior cingulate cortex during emotional interference.情绪干扰期间喙前扣带回皮质的差异性功能连接性
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):476-486. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw137.
7
Maternal buffering of human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry during childhood but not during adolescence.童年期而非青春期母体对人类杏仁核-前额叶神经回路的缓冲作用。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;25(11):2067-78. doi: 10.1177/0956797614550878. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
8
Neural correlates of suspiciousness and interactions with anxiety during emotional and neutral word processing.在情绪和中性词汇处理过程中,怀疑的神经相关性及其与焦虑的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 27;5:596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00596. eCollection 2014.
9
Cognitive and neural aspects of information processing in major depressive disorder: an integrative perspective.重性抑郁障碍信息处理的认知和神经基础:综合观点
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 12;3:489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00489. eCollection 2012.
10
Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder.焦虑障碍和重性抑郁障碍中的自动化。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):575-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.