Bocci V
Institute of General Physiology, University of Siena, Italy.
Br J Biomed Sci. 1999;56(4):270-9.
Although ozone therapy has been used as an alternative medical approach for four decades, it has encountered scepticism, if not outright objection, by orthodox medicine. This prejudice is not unjustified because ozone therapy often has been used without rational basis or appropriate controls. With the advent of precise medical ozone generators, it is now possible to evaluate some mechanisms of action and possible toxicity. In contrast with the respiratory tract, human blood exposed to appropriate ozone concentrations is able to tame its strong oxidant properties and neither acute nor chronic side effects have ensued in millions of patients treated with ozonated autohaemotherapy. This paper summarises studies aimed at clarifying biological effects, defining any possible damage, the therapeutic window, and suitable doses able to express therapeutic activity. Although an unfashionable and unpopular approach, it is hoped that orthodox medicine will help to critically assess the validity of ozone therapy.
尽管臭氧疗法作为一种替代医学方法已被使用了40年,但它遭到了正统医学的怀疑,甚至是直接反对。这种偏见并非毫无根据,因为臭氧疗法常常在没有合理依据或适当控制的情况下被使用。随着精确医用臭氧发生器的出现,现在有可能评估其一些作用机制和潜在毒性。与呼吸道不同,暴露于适当臭氧浓度下的人体血液能够缓和其强氧化特性,并且在数百万接受臭氧自血疗法治疗的患者中,既没有出现急性副作用,也没有出现慢性副作用。本文总结了旨在阐明生物学效应、确定任何可能损害、治疗窗口以及能够发挥治疗活性的合适剂量的研究。尽管这是一种不流行且不受欢迎的方法,但希望正统医学能够帮助严格评估臭氧疗法的有效性。