Jefferson T O, Demicheli V, Deeks J J, Rivetti D
Cochrane Vaccines Field, Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavillion, Middle Way, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX2 7LG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001169.
Amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride have antiviral properties, but they are not widely used due to a lack of knowledge of their properties and concerns about possible adverse effects. The objective of this review was to assess the effects and safety of amantadine and rimantadine in healthy adults.
We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers, researchers and authors.
Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing amantadine and/or rimantadine with placebo, control antivirals or no intervention, or comparing doses or schedules of amantadine and/or rimantadine in healthy adults.
For prevention trials the numbers of participants with clinically defined influenza, with serologically confirmed clinical influenza A and adverse effects were analysed. Analysis for treatment trials was of the mean duration of fever and adverse effects.
Amantadine prevented 23% of clinical influenza cases (95% confidence interval 11% to 34%), and 63% of serologically confirmed clinical influenza A cases (95% confidence interval 42% to 76%) Amantadine reduced duration of fever by one day (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 1.3). Rimantadine demonstrated comparable effectiveness, but there were fewer trials and the results for prevention were not statistically significant. Both amantadine and rimantadine induced significant gastrointestinal adverse effects. Adverse effects of the central nervous system adverse and study withdrawals were significantly more common with amantadine than rimantadine.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine and rimantadine have comparable effectiveness in the prevention and treatment of influenza A in healthy adults, although rimantadine induces fewer adverse effects than amantadine.
盐酸金刚烷胺和盐酸金刚乙胺具有抗病毒特性,但由于对其特性缺乏了解以及对可能的不良反应的担忧,它们并未得到广泛应用。本综述的目的是评估金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺在健康成年人中的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库、Medline、Embase以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了制造商、研究人员和作者。
比较金刚烷胺和/或金刚乙胺与安慰剂、对照抗病毒药物或无干预措施,或比较健康成年人中金刚烷胺和/或金刚乙胺的剂量或给药方案的随机和半随机研究。
对于预防试验,分析了临床确诊流感、血清学确诊临床甲型流感以及不良反应的参与者人数。治疗试验的分析内容为发热的平均持续时间和不良反应。
金刚烷胺预防了23%的临床流感病例(95%置信区间为11%至34%),以及63%的血清学确诊临床甲型流感病例(95%置信区间为42%至76%)。金刚烷胺使发热持续时间缩短了一天(95%置信区间为0.7至1.3)。金刚乙胺显示出相当的疗效,但试验较少,预防结果无统计学意义。金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺均引起显著的胃肠道不良反应。金刚烷胺引起的中枢神经系统不良反应和研究退出明显比金刚乙胺更常见。
金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺在预防和治疗健康成年人甲型流感方面疗效相当,尽管金刚乙胺引起的不良反应比金刚烷胺少。