• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于大流行和季节性流感的孕妇抗病毒药物:经济计算机模型。

Antiviral medications for pregnant women for pandemic and seasonal influenza: an economic computer model.

机构信息

From the Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health; and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):971-980. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bdbfed.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bdbfed
PMID:20168096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3388110/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the economic value of administering antiviral medications to pregnant women who have come in contact with an infectious individual with influenza.

METHODS

A computer-simulation model was developed to predict the potential economic effect of antiviral use for postexposure prophylaxis among pregnant women in both seasonal influenza and pandemic influenza scenarios. The model allowed us to examine the effects of varying influenza exposure risk, antiviral efficacy, antiviral cost, and the probability of different influenza outcomes such as hospitalization, preterm delivery, and mortality.

RESULTS

For a variety of pandemic influenza scenarios (attack rate 20% or more, probability of preterm birth for women with influenza 12% or more, mortality for a preterm neonate 2% or more, and probability of influenza-attributable hospitalization 4.8% or more), the postexposure prophylactic use of antiviral medications was strongly cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values below $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Antiviral prophylaxis became an economically dominant strategy (that is, less costly and more effective) when the influenza attack rate is 20% or more and preterm birth rate is 36% or more, and when attack rate is 30% or more and preterm birth rate is 24% or more. Antiviral prophylaxis was not cost-effective under seasonal influenza conditions.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of antiviral medications for postexposure prophylaxis among pregnant women in a pandemic influenza scenario but not in a seasonal influenza setting.

摘要

目的

评估对接触流感传染性个体的孕妇进行抗病毒药物治疗的经济价值。

方法

开发了一种计算机模拟模型,以预测在季节性流感和大流行流感情况下对孕妇进行暴露后预防使用抗病毒药物的潜在经济影响。该模型使我们能够检查不同的流感暴露风险、抗病毒疗效、抗病毒药物成本以及不同流感结局(如住院、早产和死亡)的可能性的影响。

结果

对于多种大流行流感情况(发病率为 20%或更高,流感孕妇的早产概率为 12%或更高,早产儿的死亡率为 2%或更高,以及与流感相关的住院率为 4.8%或更高),暴露后预防性使用抗病毒药物具有很强的成本效益,增量成本效益比低于每质量调整生命年 50000 美元。当流感发病率为 20%或更高,早产率为 36%或更高,或者当发病率为 30%或更高,早产率为 24%或更高时,抗病毒预防成为一种具有成本效益的策略(即成本更低、效果更好)。在季节性流感情况下,抗病毒预防并不具有成本效益。

结论

这些发现支持在大流行流感情况下对孕妇使用抗病毒药物进行暴露后预防,但不支持在季节性流感情况下使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673b/3388110/db262a5ce01c/nihms-384283-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673b/3388110/bd354dd48368/nihms-384283-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673b/3388110/db262a5ce01c/nihms-384283-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673b/3388110/bd354dd48368/nihms-384283-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673b/3388110/db262a5ce01c/nihms-384283-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Antiviral medications for pregnant women for pandemic and seasonal influenza: an economic computer model.用于大流行和季节性流感的孕妇抗病毒药物:经济计算机模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):971-980. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bdbfed.
2
Influenza A/H1N1v in pregnancy: an investigation of the characteristics and management of affected women and the relationship to pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant.甲型 H1N1v 流感病毒感染孕妇:对受感染孕妇的特征和管理情况以及母婴妊娠结局之间关系的调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(34):109-82. doi: 10.3310/hta14340-02.
3
Economic evaluation of oseltamivir phosphate for postexposure prophylaxis of influenza in long-term care facilities.磷酸奥司他韦用于长期护理机构流感暴露后预防的经济学评价
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Mar;53(3):444-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53162.x.
4
Economic value of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination during pregnancy.季节性和大流行性流感疫苗接种在妊娠期的经济学价值。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 15;49(12):1784-92. doi: 10.1086/649013.
5
Influenza infection and vaccination in pregnant women.孕妇的流感感染与疫苗接种。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2010 Jun;4(3):321-8. doi: 10.1586/ers.10.26.
6
The cost effectiveness of pandemic influenza interventions: a pandemic severity based analysis.大流行性流感干预措施的成本效益:基于大流行严重程度的分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e61504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061504. Print 2013.
7
Post-exposure influenza prophylaxis with oseltamivir: cost effectiveness and cost utility in families in the UK.使用奥司他韦进行暴露后流感预防:英国家庭中的成本效益和成本效用
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(4):373-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624040-00007.
8
Antiviral agents for influenza: a comparison of cost-effectiveness data.用于流感的抗病毒药物:成本效益数据比较
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(11):1083-106. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00003.
9
An incremental economic evaluation of targeted and universal influenza vaccination in pregnant women.针对孕妇的目标人群和普遍流感疫苗接种的增量经济评估。
Can J Public Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;102(6):445-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03404197.
10
[Cost-effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women against pandemic influenza in Colombia].[哥伦比亚孕妇接种大流行性流感疫苗的成本效益分析]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012 Jun;31(6):447-53. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892012000600001.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic literature review on public health and healthcare resources for pandemic preparedness planning.系统文献回顾:大流行准备规划中的公共卫生和医疗资源
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3114. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20629-z.
2
Using Simulation Modeling to Guide the Design of the Girl Scouts Fierce & Fit Program.利用仿真建模指导女童子军“勇敢与健康”项目的设计。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Jul;28(7):1317-1324. doi: 10.1002/oby.22827. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
A systems approach to obesity.一种针对肥胖症的系统方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Data Resource Profile: The Human Mortality Database (HMD).数据资源简介:人类死亡率数据库(HMD)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1549-56. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv105. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA.美国孕期感染2009年甲型H1N1流感病毒的情况。
Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):451-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61304-0. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
3
Novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infections in three pregnant women - United States, April-May 2009.2009年4月至5月美国3名孕妇感染新型甲型H1N1流感病毒
Nutr Rev. 2017 Jan;75(suppl 1):94-106. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw049.
4
A systems approach to vaccine decision making.一种用于疫苗决策的系统方法。
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 20;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):A36-A42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer.未被关注还是未被执行?关于季节性流感和早期乳腺癌健康经济决策模型验证工作报告的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Sep;34(9):833-45. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0410-3.
6
The cost of an Ebola case.一例埃博拉病例的成本。
Pathog Glob Health. 2015 Feb;109(1):4-9. doi: 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000169. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
7
Systematic review of economic evaluations of preparedness strategies and interventions against influenza pandemics.流感大流行防范策略和干预措施的经济评价的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030333. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
Impact of introducing the pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccines into the routine immunization program in Niger.尼日尔常规免疫规划中引入肺炎球菌和轮状病毒疫苗的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):269-76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300218. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
Maintaining vaccine delivery following the introduction of the rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines in Thailand.维持疫苗接种:泰国引入轮状病毒和肺炎球菌疫苗之后
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024673. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
10
The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a case study of how modeling can assist all stages of vaccine decision-making.2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行:建模如何协助疫苗决策各阶段的案例研究
Hum Vaccin. 2011 Jan 1;7(1):115-9. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.1.13740.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 15;58(18):497-500.
4
Cost-effectiveness of treating influenzalike illness with oseltamivir in the United States.在美国使用奥司他韦治疗流感样疾病的成本效益
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Mar 1;66(5):469-80. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080296.
5
2009 update in prevention, evaluation, and outpatient treatment of influenza.2009年流感预防、评估及门诊治疗的更新内容。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):817-28. doi: 10.1185/03007990802708244.
6
Statement on influenza vaccination for the 2008-2009 season. An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS).2008 - 2009年度流感疫苗接种声明。一份咨询委员会声明(ACS)。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2008 Jul;34(ACS-3):1-46.
7
The metabolism and transplacental transfer of oseltamivir in the ex vivo human model.奥司他韦在体外人体模型中的代谢及经胎盘转运
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008:927574. doi: 10.1155/2008/927574.
8
What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule?现代医学的价值对于每质量调整生命年5万美元的决策规则有何看法?
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):349-56. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815c31a7.
9
Influenza vaccination of recommended adult populations, U.S., 1989-2005.1989 - 2005年美国推荐成年人群的流感疫苗接种情况
Vaccine. 2008 Mar 25;26(14):1786-93. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.040. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Cost-effectiveness of antiviral stockpiling and near-patient testing for potential influenza pandemic.抗病毒药物储备及即时检验在潜在流感大流行中的成本效益分析
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Feb;14(2):267-74. doi: 10.3201/eid1402.070478.