Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Di Pietrantonj C, Rivetti D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD001169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001169.pub3.
Amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride have antiviral properties, but they are not widely used due to a lack of knowledge of their potential value and concerns about possible adverse effects.
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy, effectiveness and safety ("effects") of amantadine and rimantadine in healthy adults.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (2003 to August Week 4, 2005), EMBASE (October 2003 to July 2005) and reference lists of articles.
Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing amantadine and/or rimantadine with placebo, control medication or no intervention, or comparing doses or schedules of amantadine and/or rimantadine in healthy adults.
For prophylaxis (prevention) trials the numbers of participants with clinical influenza (influenza-like-illness or ILI) or with confirmed influenza A and adverse effects were analysed. Analysis for treatment trials was of the mean duration of fever, length of hospital stay and adverse effects.
Amantadine prevented 25% of ILI cases (95% confidence interval (CI) 13% to 36%), and 61% of influenza A cases (95% CI 35% to 76%). Amantadine reduced duration of fever by one day (95% CI 0.7 to 1.2). Rimantadine demonstrated comparable effectiveness, but there were fewer trials and the results for prophylaxis were not statistically significant. Both amantadine and rimantadine induced significant gastrointestinal adverse effects. Adverse effects of the central nervous system and study withdrawals were significantly more common with amantadine than rimantadine. Neither drug affected the rate of viral shedding from the nose and the course of asymptomatic influenza.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine and rimantadine have comparable efficacy and effectiveness in relieving or treating symptoms of influenza A in healthy adults, although rimantadine induces fewer adverse effects than amantadine. The effectiveness of both drugs in interrupting transmission is probably low. Routine use of both drugs should be discouraged and both drugs should only be used when all other measures fail.
盐酸金刚烷胺和盐酸金刚乙胺具有抗病毒特性,但由于对其潜在价值缺乏了解以及对可能的不良反应存在担忧,它们并未得到广泛应用。
本综述的目的是评估金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺在健康成年人中的疗效、有效性和安全性(“效果”)。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第3期)、MEDLINE(2003年至2005年8月第4周)、EMBASE(2003年10月至2005年7月)以及文章的参考文献列表。
比较金刚烷胺和/或金刚乙胺与安慰剂、对照药物或无干预措施,或比较金刚烷胺和/或金刚乙胺在健康成年人中的剂量或给药方案的随机和半随机研究。
对于预防试验,分析了出现临床流感(流感样疾病或ILI)或确诊甲型流感的参与者数量以及不良反应。治疗试验的分析内容为发热的平均持续时间、住院时间和不良反应。
金刚烷胺预防了25%的ILI病例(95%置信区间(CI)为13%至36%),以及61%的甲型流感病例(95%CI为35%至76%)。金刚烷胺使发热持续时间缩短了一天(95%CI为0.7至1.2)。金刚乙胺显示出类似的有效性,但试验较少,预防结果无统计学意义。金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺均会引起显著的胃肠道不良反应。金刚烷胺引起的中枢神经系统不良反应和研究撤药情况比金刚乙胺更为常见。两种药物均不影响鼻腔病毒排出率和无症状流感的病程。
金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺在缓解或治疗健康成年人甲型流感症状方面具有类似的疗效和有效性,尽管金刚乙胺引起的不良反应比金刚烷胺少。两种药物在阻断传播方面的有效性可能较低。不建议常规使用这两种药物,只有在所有其他措施均无效时才应使用这两种药物。