Suppr超能文献

[起搏器佩戴者的电极问题(三种电极类型的经验)(作者译)]

[Electrode problems in pacemaker wearers (experiences with three electrode types) (author's transl)].

作者信息

Priester G, Gauwerky C, Kugler G, Westermann K W

出版信息

Thoraxchir Vask Chir. 1975 Apr;23(2):137-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1096936.

Abstract

3 types of electrodes (Medtronic 6903, EMT 588, MIP 2000) of 123 patients are examined by following criterial 1. rate of dislocation, 2. development of threshold, 3. time of application. We found: The Medtronic has the smallest rate of dislocation, the lowest range of threshold and is quickly placed in the right ventricle. The rate of dislocation of the EMT 588 is still just acceptable and it also has a sufficient low threshold, but in comparison to the other helical-wire electrodes the disadvantage of being rather difficult to place in the right ventricle. The MIP 2000 has not proved to be useful due to its large rate of dislocation.

摘要

对123名患者的3种类型电极(美敦力6903、EMT 588、MIP 2000)按照以下标准进行检查:1. 脱位率;2. 阈值变化;3. 使用时间。我们发现:美敦力电极的脱位率最低,阈值范围最小,且能快速放置于右心室。EMT 588的脱位率仍勉强可以接受,其阈值也足够低,但与其他螺旋线电极相比,在右心室放置时较为困难。MIP 2000因脱位率高而未被证明有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验