Priester G, Gauwerky C, Kugler G, Westermann K W
Thoraxchir Vask Chir. 1975 Apr;23(2):137-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1096936.
3 types of electrodes (Medtronic 6903, EMT 588, MIP 2000) of 123 patients are examined by following criterial 1. rate of dislocation, 2. development of threshold, 3. time of application. We found: The Medtronic has the smallest rate of dislocation, the lowest range of threshold and is quickly placed in the right ventricle. The rate of dislocation of the EMT 588 is still just acceptable and it also has a sufficient low threshold, but in comparison to the other helical-wire electrodes the disadvantage of being rather difficult to place in the right ventricle. The MIP 2000 has not proved to be useful due to its large rate of dislocation.
对123名患者的3种类型电极(美敦力6903、EMT 588、MIP 2000)按照以下标准进行检查:1. 脱位率;2. 阈值变化;3. 使用时间。我们发现:美敦力电极的脱位率最低,阈值范围最小,且能快速放置于右心室。EMT 588的脱位率仍勉强可以接受,其阈值也足够低,但与其他螺旋线电极相比,在右心室放置时较为困难。MIP 2000因脱位率高而未被证明有用。