• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

作者信息

Hashemi M, Peters J H, DeMeester T R, Huprich J E, Quek M, Hagen J A, Crookes P F, Theisen J, DeMeester S R, Sillin L F, Bremner C G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2000 May;190(5):553-60; discussion 560-1. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00260-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00260-x
PMID:10801022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies based on symptomatic outcomes analyses have shown that laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernias is safe, successful, and equivalent to open repair. These outcomes analyses were based on a relatively short followup period and lack objective confirmation that the hernia has not recurred. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open repair of large type III hiatal hernia using both symptomatic evaluation and barium study to assess the integrity of the repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-four patients underwent repair of a large type III hiatal hernia between 1985 and 1998. The surgical approach was laparotomy in 13, thoracotomy in 14, and laparoscopy in 27. An antireflux procedure was included in all patients. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed using a structured questionnaire at a median of 24 months and was complete in 51 of 54 patients (94%). A single radiologist, without knowledge of the operative procedure, assessed the integrity of the repair using video esophagram. Videos were performed at a median of 27 months (35 months open and 17 laparoscopic) and were completed in 41 of 54 patients (75%).

RESULTS

Symptomatic outcomes were similar in both groups with excellent or good outcomes in 76% of the patients after laparoscopic repair and 88% after an open repair. Reherniation was present in 12 patients and was asymptomatic in 7. A recurrent hernia was present in 12 of the 41 patients (29%) who returned for a followup video esophagram. Forty-two percent (9 of 21) of the laparoscopic group had a recurrent hernia compared with 15% (3 of 20) of the open group (p < 0.001 log-rank value on recurrence-free followup).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of type III hiatal hernias is associated with a disturbingly high (42%) prevalence of recurrent hernia. More than half such recurrences have few, if any, symptoms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 May;190(5):553-60; discussion 560-1. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00260-x.
2
Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.前位胃固定术可能会降低腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后的复发率。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1036-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8765-2. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
3
Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia Without the Need for Esophageal Lengthening With Low Morbidity and Rare Symptomatic Recurrence.无需延长食管的腹腔镜下大型食管裂孔疝修补术,发病率低且症状性复发罕见。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):418-425. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia.腹腔镜修复食管旁裂孔疝后安全性及生活质量的中期分析
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1045-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9227-1. Epub 2004 Jun 10.
5
Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;6(2):181-8; discussion 188. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00067-1.
6
Giant hiatal hernias: direct hiatus closure has an acceptable recurrence rate.巨大食管裂孔疝:直接裂孔关闭术具有可接受的复发率。
Updates Surg. 2011 Jun;63(2):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0066-7. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
7
Symptomatic and radiological follow-up after para-esophageal hernia repair.食管旁疝修补术后的症状及影像学随访
Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(4):279-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00426.x.
8
Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.腹腔镜修复大型食管旁疝的复发率和再次手术率较低。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):444-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
9
Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.食管裂孔大小对腹腔镜胃底折叠术和网片食管裂孔修补术后再疝发生率的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1024-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1308-3. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
10
Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. A single center experience.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术。单中心经验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.067. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of the sac during surgery for the repair of "giant" paraesophageal hernias.在手术修复“巨大”食管旁疝时切除囊袋。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106365. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106365.
2
Frailty predicts recurrence after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with mesh cruroplasty for giant sliding hiatal hernia with severe reflux esophagitis in elderly patients: a multicenter retrospective study.虚弱可预测老年严重反流性食管炎合并巨大滑动性食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术加网状膈肌成形术后的复发情况:一项多中心回顾性研究
Hernia. 2025 Jul 18;29(1):235. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03416-6.
3
Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
前位胃固定术治疗食管旁疝:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5788.
4
Patients report significant improvement in quality of life following hiatal hernia repair-despite recurrence.尽管存在复发,患者仍报告在膈疝修补术后生活质量有显著改善。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6001-6007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11106-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
[Surgical strategy for hiatal hernias].[食管裂孔疝的手术策略]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;95(4):336-344. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02054-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
6
Cruroplasty with or without mesh? A systematic literature review with a novel time-organized proportion meta-analysis.带或不带补片的股部成形术?一项采用新型时间组织比例Meta分析的系统文献综述。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1685-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10683-4. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
7
Determining the need for a thoracoscopic approach to treat a giant hiatal hernia when abdominal access is poor.当经腹入路不佳时,确定采用胸腔镜方法治疗巨大食管裂孔疝的必要性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2739-2746. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2739.
8
Laparoscopic Posterior Cruroplasty and Anterior Gastropexy for Type IV Hiatal Hernia Repair in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.老年患者IV型食管裂孔疝修补术的腹腔镜后路十字韧带成形术和前路胃固定术:病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 8;15(10):e46698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46698. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Recurrence in Paraesophageal Hernia: Patient Factors and Composite Surgical Repair in 862 Cases.食管旁疝复发:862 例患者因素和复合手术修复。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2733-2742. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05856-w. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
Is it meaningful to add mesh reinforcement to laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias in the patients with high risk of hiatal hernia recurrence?对于食管裂孔疝复发高风险的患者,在腹腔镜胃底折叠术中添加网片加强是否有意义?
Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01026-8. Epub 2023 Oct 10.