Andujar J J, Papasavas P K, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagné D J, Caushaj P F, Landreneau R J, Keenan R J
Minimally Invasive Surgical Program, West Penn Allegheny Health System, 4800 Friendship Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):444-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (LRPEH) is a feasible and effective technique. There have been some recent concerns regarding possible high recurrence rates following laparoscopic repair.
We reviewed our experience with LRPEH from 5/1996 to 8/2002. Large paraesophageal hernia (PEH) was defined by the presence of more than one-third of the stomach in the thoracic cavity. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, approximation of the crura, and fundoplication. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were evaluated utilizing visual analogue scores (VAS) on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were followed with VAS and barium esophagram studies. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student's t-test.
A total of 166 patients with a mean age of 68 years underwent LRPEH. PEH were type II ( n = 43), type III ( n = 104), and type IV ( n = 19). Mean operative time was 160 min. Fundoplications were Nissen (127), Toupet (23), Dor (1), and Nissen-Collis (1). Fourteen patients underwent a gastropexy. One patient required early reoperation to repair an esophageal leak. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. At 24 months postoperatively there was statistically significant improvement in the mean symptom scores: heartburn from 6.8 to 0.5, regurgitation from 5.9 to 0.3, dysphagia from 4.0 to 0.5, chest pain from 3.7 to 0.3. Radiographic surveillance was obtained in 120 patients (72%) at a mean of 15 months postoperatively. Six patients (5%) had radiographic evidence of a recurrent paraesophageal hernia (two required surgery), 24 patients (20%) had a sliding hernia (two required surgery), and four patients (3.3%) had wrap failure (all four required surgery). Reoperation was required in 10 patients (6%); two for symptomatic recurrent PEH (1.2%), four for recurrent reflux symptoms (2.4%), and four for dysphagia (2.4%). Patients with abnormal postoperative barium esophagram studies who did not require reoperation have remained asymptomatic at a mean follow up of 14 months.
LPEHR is a safe and effective treatment for PEH. Postoperative radiographic abnormalities, such as a small sliding hernia, are often seen. The clinical importance of these findings is questionable, since only a small percentage of patients require reoperation. True PEH recurrences are uncommon and frequently asymptomatic.
腹腔镜修复食管旁疝(LRPEH)是一种可行且有效的技术。近期有人担心腹腔镜修复术后可能有较高的复发率。
我们回顾了1996年5月至2002年8月期间LRPEH的治疗经验。巨大食管旁疝(PEH)定义为胸腔内胃组织超过三分之一。修复原则包括疝内容物回纳、疝囊切除、膈脚靠拢及胃底折叠术。术前及术后症状采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估,范围为0至10分。对患者进行VAS及食管钡餐造影随访。采用双侧t检验进行统计学分析。
共有166例平均年龄68岁的患者接受了LRPEH手术。PEH分别为Ⅱ型(n = 43)、Ⅲ型(n = 104)和Ⅳ型(n = 19)。平均手术时间为160分钟。胃底折叠术式包括nissen术(127例)、Toupet术(23例)、Dor术(1例)和nissen - Collis术(1例)。14例患者接受了胃固定术。1例患者因食管漏需要早期再次手术。平均住院时间为3.9天。术后24个月时,平均症状评分有统计学意义的改善:烧心从6.8降至0.5,反流从5.9降至0.3,吞咽困难从4.0降至0.5,胸痛从3.7降至0.3。120例患者(72%)在术后平均15个月时接受了影像学监测。6例患者(5%)有食管旁疝复发的影像学证据(2例需手术),24例患者(20%)有滑动疝(2例需手术),4例患者(3.3%)有胃底折叠失败(4例均需手术)。10例患者(6%)需要再次手术;2例因有症状的复发性PEH(1.2%),4例因复发性反流症状(2.4%),4例因吞咽困难(2.4%)。术后食管钡餐造影异常但无需再次手术的患者在平均14个月的随访中无症状。
LPEHR是治疗PEH的一种安全有效的方法。术后常可见影像学异常,如小的滑动疝。这些发现的临床意义存疑,因为只有一小部分患者需要再次手术。真正的PEH复发并不常见,且常无症状。