• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜修复大型食管旁疝的复发率和再次手术率较低。

Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.

作者信息

Andujar J J, Papasavas P K, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagné D J, Caushaj P F, Landreneau R J, Keenan R J

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Surgical Program, West Penn Allegheny Health System, 4800 Friendship Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):444-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. Epub 2004 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4
PMID:14752653
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (LRPEH) is a feasible and effective technique. There have been some recent concerns regarding possible high recurrence rates following laparoscopic repair.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with LRPEH from 5/1996 to 8/2002. Large paraesophageal hernia (PEH) was defined by the presence of more than one-third of the stomach in the thoracic cavity. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, approximation of the crura, and fundoplication. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were evaluated utilizing visual analogue scores (VAS) on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were followed with VAS and barium esophagram studies. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student's t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients with a mean age of 68 years underwent LRPEH. PEH were type II ( n = 43), type III ( n = 104), and type IV ( n = 19). Mean operative time was 160 min. Fundoplications were Nissen (127), Toupet (23), Dor (1), and Nissen-Collis (1). Fourteen patients underwent a gastropexy. One patient required early reoperation to repair an esophageal leak. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. At 24 months postoperatively there was statistically significant improvement in the mean symptom scores: heartburn from 6.8 to 0.5, regurgitation from 5.9 to 0.3, dysphagia from 4.0 to 0.5, chest pain from 3.7 to 0.3. Radiographic surveillance was obtained in 120 patients (72%) at a mean of 15 months postoperatively. Six patients (5%) had radiographic evidence of a recurrent paraesophageal hernia (two required surgery), 24 patients (20%) had a sliding hernia (two required surgery), and four patients (3.3%) had wrap failure (all four required surgery). Reoperation was required in 10 patients (6%); two for symptomatic recurrent PEH (1.2%), four for recurrent reflux symptoms (2.4%), and four for dysphagia (2.4%). Patients with abnormal postoperative barium esophagram studies who did not require reoperation have remained asymptomatic at a mean follow up of 14 months.

CONCLUSION

LPEHR is a safe and effective treatment for PEH. Postoperative radiographic abnormalities, such as a small sliding hernia, are often seen. The clinical importance of these findings is questionable, since only a small percentage of patients require reoperation. True PEH recurrences are uncommon and frequently asymptomatic.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜修复食管旁疝(LRPEH)是一种可行且有效的技术。近期有人担心腹腔镜修复术后可能有较高的复发率。

方法

我们回顾了1996年5月至2002年8月期间LRPEH的治疗经验。巨大食管旁疝(PEH)定义为胸腔内胃组织超过三分之一。修复原则包括疝内容物回纳、疝囊切除、膈脚靠拢及胃底折叠术。术前及术后症状采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估,范围为0至10分。对患者进行VAS及食管钡餐造影随访。采用双侧t检验进行统计学分析。

结果

共有166例平均年龄68岁的患者接受了LRPEH手术。PEH分别为Ⅱ型(n = 43)、Ⅲ型(n = 104)和Ⅳ型(n = 19)。平均手术时间为160分钟。胃底折叠术式包括nissen术(127例)、Toupet术(23例)、Dor术(1例)和nissen - Collis术(1例)。14例患者接受了胃固定术。1例患者因食管漏需要早期再次手术。平均住院时间为3.9天。术后24个月时,平均症状评分有统计学意义的改善:烧心从6.8降至0.5,反流从5.9降至0.3,吞咽困难从4.0降至0.5,胸痛从3.7降至0.3。120例患者(72%)在术后平均15个月时接受了影像学监测。6例患者(5%)有食管旁疝复发的影像学证据(2例需手术),24例患者(20%)有滑动疝(2例需手术),4例患者(3.3%)有胃底折叠失败(4例均需手术)。10例患者(6%)需要再次手术;2例因有症状的复发性PEH(1.2%),4例因复发性反流症状(2.4%),4例因吞咽困难(2.4%)。术后食管钡餐造影异常但无需再次手术的患者在平均14个月的随访中无症状。

结论

LPEHR是治疗PEH的一种安全有效的方法。术后常可见影像学异常,如小的滑动疝。这些发现的临床意义存疑,因为只有一小部分患者需要再次手术。真正的PEH复发并不常见,且常无症状。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.腹腔镜修复大型食管旁疝的复发率和再次手术率较低。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):444-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
2
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with poor esophageal motility or paraesophageal herniation.腹腔镜下食管动力差或食管旁疝患者的食管裂孔疝修补术。
Am Surg. 2001 Oct;67(10):987-91.
3
Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术的临床及影像学评估
Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s004649901021.
4
Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia.腹腔镜修复食管旁裂孔疝后安全性及生活质量的中期分析
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1045-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9227-1. Epub 2004 Jun 10.
5
Biological Mesh Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: An Analysis of Our Outcomes.食管旁疝的生物补片修复:我们的结果分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Nov;29(11):1446-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0423. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
Novel "starburst" mesh configuration for paraesophageal and recurrent hiatal hernia repair: comparison with keyhole mesh configuration.新型“星爆”网片修补食管旁疝和复发性食管裂孔疝的效果:与“钥匙孔”网片修补的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09447-9. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
A comparison between Belsey Mark IV and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with large paraesophageal hernia.Belsey Mark IV 与腹腔镜 Nissen 胃底折叠术治疗巨大食管裂孔疝的对比。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;156(1):418-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.092. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias: a Canadian experience.腹腔镜下食管旁疝修补术:加拿大的经验
Can J Surg. 2008 Oct;51(5):355-60.
9
Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation.巨大食管旁疝的腹腔镜治疗
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1080-6; discussion 1086-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01229-7.
10
[Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease].腹腔镜尼森、图佩特和多尔胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):1014-1020.

引用本文的文献

1
One-year outcomes of biological mesh in hiatal hernia repair: a real-world study.生物补片用于食管裂孔疝修补的一年期疗效:一项真实世界研究
Hernia. 2025 Mar 25;29(1):123. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03316-9.
2
Hiatal Hernias Revisited-A Systematic Review of Definitions, Classifications, and Applications.食管裂孔疝再探讨——定义、分类及应用的系统评价
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/life14091145.
3
Small Bowel Obstruction Caused by Type IV Hiatal Hernia.IV型食管裂孔疝导致的小肠梗阻

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:一项具有挑战性的手术——116例患者的中期结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jan;7(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00151-8.
2
Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?食管旁疝:手术还是观察?
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):492-500; discussion 500-1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012.
3
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜修复食管旁疝的长期疗效
Case Rep Surg. 2024 Feb 20;2024:8837649. doi: 10.1155/2024/8837649. eCollection 2024.
4
EAES Multidisciplinary Rapid Guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed recommendations on the surgical management of paraesophageal hernias.EAES 多学科快速指南:食管裂孔疝手术治疗的系统评价、荟萃分析、GRADE 评估和循证推荐。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9013-9029. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10511-1. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treating patients with massive hiatal hernia and iron-deficiency anaemia.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术治疗巨大食管裂孔疝并缺铁性贫血患者。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 26;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02184-3.
6
Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.生物可吸收补片能否降低食管裂孔疝复发率?一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2295-2303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09514-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Robotic voluminous paraesophageal hernia repair: a case report and review of the literature.机器人辅助巨大食管旁疝修补术:一例病例报告及文献综述
J Med Case Rep. 2020 Feb 4;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-2347-6.
8
Role of fundoplication in treatment of patients with symptoms of hiatal hernia.胃底折叠术在治疗食管裂孔疝症状患者中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48740-x.
9
Emergent Repair of Paraesophageal Hernias and the Argument for Elective Repair.食管旁疝的急诊修复及择期修复的依据
JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00015.
10
Long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication for the management of types III and IV hiatal hernias.腹腔镜 Nissen 与 Toupet 胃底折叠术治疗 III 型和 IV 型食管裂孔疝的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2895-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6589-y. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
Surg Endosc. 2002 May;16(5):745-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8194-7. Epub 2002 Feb 8.
4
Paraesophageal hernias: open, laparoscopic, or thoracic repair?食管旁疝:开放手术、腹腔镜手术还是胸腔修复术?
Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2001 Aug;11(3):589-603.
5
Minimally invasive management of paraesophageal herniation in the high-risk surgical patient.高危手术患者食管旁疝的微创治疗
Am J Surg. 2001 Nov;182(5):510-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00760-7.
6
An unusual case of gastric volvulus after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):757. doi: 10.1007/s004640020031. Epub 2001 May 14.
7
Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation.巨大食管旁疝的腹腔镜治疗
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1080-6; discussion 1086-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01229-7.
8
Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜修补巨大食管旁疝
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jul;12(3):179-85. doi: 10.1053/stcs.2000.9785.
9
Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases.腹腔镜修复巨大食管旁疝:连续100例病例
Ann Surg. 2000 Oct;232(4):608-18. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00016.
10
Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 May;190(5):553-60; discussion 560-1. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00260-x.