Suppr超能文献

兰瑞肽对骨关节炎疼痛患者镇痛作用的研究。

Study of the analgesic effect of lanepitant in patients with osteoarthritis pain.

作者信息

Goldstein D J, Wang O, Todd L E, Gitter B D, DeBrota D J, Iyengar S

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Apr;67(4):419-26. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.105243.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lanepitant selectively blocks substance P binding to the neurokinin-1 receptor, preventing neurogenic inflammation and pain transmission. Substance P is present in synovial fluid and in excess in cerebral spinal fluid. We investigated the effect of lanepitant on pain caused by osteoarthritis to evaluate the role of neurokinin-1 blockade.

METHODS

Outpatients (n = 214) with moderate to severe lower-limb osteoarthritis pain were treated for 3 weeks in a parallel, randomized double-blind study with initial doses of 20, 60, 200, or 600 mg lanepitant, 375 mg naproxen, or placebo, followed by 10, 30, 100, or 300 mg lanepitant twice a day, 375 mg naproxen twice a day, or placebo twice a day in the multiple-dose period. Pain intensity, pain relief, patient global impression, and adjunctive analgesic use were compared across treatments. Safety was evaluated with adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory assessments.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy or safety across treatments for the initial dose assessment. After 1 week of therapy, naproxen was statistically significantly (P < .05) better than placebo and lanepitant in reducing average pain. During the second and third weeks of therapy, patients receiving naproxen continued to have statistically significantly (P < .05) less pain than those receiving placebo or lanepitant despite using significantly less adjunctive analgesic medication. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of discontinuation across treatments. Lanepitant treatment was associated with diarrhea, whereas naproxen treatment was associated with gastric discomfort. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs or laboratory analytes for any of the treatments.

CONCLUSION

Lanepitant was ineffective in relieving osteoarthritis pain, possibly because neurokinin-1 binding of substance P does not play a significant role in osteoarthritis pain or because lanepitant fails to adequately penetrate the blood-brain barrier to affect central pain perception.

摘要

目的

拉奈匹坦可选择性阻断P物质与神经激肽-1受体的结合,从而预防神经源性炎症和疼痛传导。P物质存在于滑液中,在脑脊液中含量过高。我们研究了拉奈匹坦对骨关节炎所致疼痛的影响,以评估神经激肽-1阻断的作用。

方法

在一项平行、随机双盲研究中,对214例中重度下肢骨关节炎疼痛的门诊患者进行了3周治疗,初始剂量分别为20、60、200或600mg拉奈匹坦、375mg萘普生或安慰剂,随后在多剂量期每天两次给予10、30、100或300mg拉奈匹坦、每天两次给予375mg萘普生或每天两次给予安慰剂。比较各治疗组的疼痛强度、疼痛缓解情况、患者总体印象及辅助镇痛药的使用情况。通过不良事件、生命体征和实验室评估来评估安全性。

结果

在初始剂量评估中,各治疗组在疗效或安全性方面无统计学显著差异。治疗1周后,萘普生在减轻平均疼痛方面在统计学上显著优于安慰剂和拉奈匹坦(P <.05)。在治疗的第二周和第三周,接受萘普生治疗的患者尽管使用的辅助镇痛药明显较少,但在统计学上仍显著(P <.05)比接受安慰剂或拉奈匹坦治疗的患者疼痛更少。各治疗组的停药率无统计学显著差异。拉奈匹坦治疗与腹泻有关,而萘普生治疗与胃部不适有关。任何治疗组的生命体征或实验室分析物均无临床相关变化。

结论

拉奈匹坦在缓解骨关节炎疼痛方面无效,可能是因为P物质与神经激肽-1的结合在骨关节炎疼痛中不发挥重要作用,或者是因为拉奈匹坦未能充分穿透血脑屏障以影响中枢性疼痛感知。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验