• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致力于改善国民医疗服务体系。

In pursuit of an improving National Health Service.

作者信息

Enthoven A C

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):102-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.102.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.102
PMID:10812784
Abstract

The British National Health Service (NHS) before its 1990s internal-market reforms was a gridlock of perverse incentives. The internal market, an attempt to introduce some market incentives, stimulated much innovation in primary care commissioning and practice improvement and led to increased efficiency. However, its effects were quite limited, because the essential conditions for a market to operate were not fulfilled. There now exists a crisis of confidence in the quality of care in the NHS. It is doubtful whether a culture of innovation, efficiency, and good customer service is possible in a public-sector monopoly whose services are in excess demand and whose units do not get more resources for caring for more patients. It also is doubtful whether the NHS can modernize without consumer choice, competition, and more resources.

摘要

20世纪90年代内部市场改革之前的英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)是一个充满不当激励的僵局。内部市场试图引入一些市场激励措施,刺激了初级医疗保健委托和实践改进方面的大量创新,并提高了效率。然而,其效果相当有限,因为市场运作的基本条件并未得到满足。目前,人们对NHS的医疗质量存在信心危机。在一个服务供不应求且各部门不会因照顾更多患者而获得更多资源的公共部门垄断机构中,是否能形成创新、高效和优质客户服务的文化令人怀疑。同样令人怀疑的是,NHS在没有消费者选择、竞争和更多资源的情况下能否实现现代化。

相似文献

1
In pursuit of an improving National Health Service.致力于改善国民医疗服务体系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):102-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.102.
2
A comparative study of internal customer management practices within service sector firms and the National Health Service.服务行业公司与国民医疗服务体系内部客户管理实践的比较研究。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Feb;19(2):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01084.x.
3
Market mechanisms and the management of health care. The UK model and experience.
J Manag Med. 1997;11(5-6):318-28. doi: 10.1108/02689239710189780.
4
Plus ça change, plus c'est la meme chose: to the internal market and back in the British National Health Service?万变不离其宗:回归英国国民医疗服务体系的内部市场?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2002;1(4):171-8.
5
Questioning the role of the private market in the British NHS.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):129-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.129.
6
In practice: the NHS market in the United Kingdom. Health Policy Network of the National Health Service Consultant's Association and the National Health Service Support Federation.实际情况:英国国民保健制度市场。国民保健制度顾问协会健康政策网络与国民保健制度支持联合会。
J Public Health Policy. 1995;16(4):452-91.
7
The impact of a quasi-market on sexually transmitted disease services in the UK.准市场对英国性传播疾病服务的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Nov;49(10):1287-98. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00203-8.
8
Competition and efficiency in health care--the case of the British National Health Service.医疗保健中的竞争与效率——以英国国民医疗服务体系为例。
J Nurs Manag. 1994 Jan;2(1):31-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1994.tb00125.x.
9
IS/IT market support systems: augmenting UK primary health care groups.信息系统/信息技术市场支持系统:增强英国初级医疗保健团体
Top Health Inf Manage. 1999 Nov;20(2):83-90.
10
Quality, innovation, prevention and productivity.质量、创新、预防与生产力。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(8):S3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup8.S3.

引用本文的文献

1
Power and Purchasing: Why Strategic Purchasing Fails.权力与采购:战略采购为何失败。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):975-1020. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12471. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Public-Private or Master-Servant? Examining the Implementation of the Serious Disease Insurance Scheme in China.公私伙伴关系还是主仆关系?审视中国大病保险制度的实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051490.
3
Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups.
在 2012 年《健康和社会保健法案》下的英国国民保健制度中通过竞争与合作进行授权委托:来自四个临床委托代理机构的定性研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 9;7(2):e011745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745.
4
An economic analysis of the limits of market based reforms in the English NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系中基于市场的改革的经济分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S1. Epub 2013 May 24.
5
The end of the NHS?英国国民医疗服务体系的终结?
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Apr;61(585):290. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X567153.
6
The politics of local hospital reform: a case study of hospital reorganization following the 2002 Norwegian hospital reform.地方医院改革的政治因素:以2002年挪威医院改革后的医院重组为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 20;9:212. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-212.
7
Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement within the UK.救护车服务在紧急呼叫中命中和未命中目标的情况:英国不同绩效衡量系统的影响
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):161-190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00557.x.
8
Convergence or divergence? Reforming primary care in Norway and Britain.趋同还是背离?挪威和英国的初级医疗改革
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):305-30, 173. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-2-00055.
9
Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente.花同样的钱获得更多:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)与加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente)的比较。
BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):135-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.135.
10
Markets, politicians, and the NHS. Enthoven's analysis still illuminates the NHS.市场、政治家与英国国家医疗服务体系。恩托文的分析对英国国家医疗服务体系仍有启发意义。
BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1383-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1383.