• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公私伙伴关系还是主仆关系?审视中国大病保险制度的实施。

Public-Private or Master-Servant? Examining the Implementation of the Serious Disease Insurance Scheme in China.

机构信息

College of Public Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Lingnan (University) College, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051490.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17051490
PMID:32110896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7084624/
Abstract

China's Serious Disease Insurance Scheme (SDIS) was set up to relieve the financial burdens on serious disease patients. It is a crucial part of the national basic medical insurance scheme, which is regarded as one of the largest government-funded social security programs in the world. The most significant institutional innovation of the SDIS is that the approach of a public-private partnership (PPP) is applied in an attempt to facilitate the efficiency of its implementation. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the SDIS in China through PPPs, and to identify the problems to be tackled if the Chinese government intends to make such a plan work better for the majority of urban and rural residents. With the effective support from local officials and practitioners, the authors of this paper collected copies of SDIS contracts of multiple cities in Guangdong, one of the most developed provinces of China. Guided by a research framework drawn from the PPP literature, details of contract enforcement were also examined. The authors discovered that the role of local states is rather dominant; they have manipulated contract drafting and implementation. Additionally, current mechanisms for profit sharing, risk sharing, and information exchange have placed insurance companies in a rather disadvantageous situation. To achieve the sustainable development of the SDIS, the authors suggest that a further reform on implementation of a PPP must be pushed forward.

摘要

中国的重大疾病保险制度(SDIS)旨在减轻重大疾病患者的经济负担。它是国家基本医疗保险制度的重要组成部分,被认为是世界上最大的政府资助的社会保障计划之一。SDIS 的最大制度创新是采用公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)的方法,以提高其实施效率。本文旨在通过 PPP 评估中国 SDIS 的实施情况,并确定如果中国政府希望使该计划更好地为城乡居民服务,需要解决的问题。在当地官员和从业者的有效支持下,本文作者收集了中国最发达省份之一广东省多个城市的 SDIS 合同副本。本文作者以 PPP 文献中的研究框架为指导,还检查了合同执行的细节。作者发现,地方政府的作用相当主导;他们操纵了合同起草和执行。此外,当前的利润分享、风险分担和信息交流机制使保险公司处于相当不利的地位。为了实现 SDIS 的可持续发展,作者建议必须推进 PPP 实施的进一步改革。

相似文献

1
Public-Private or Master-Servant? Examining the Implementation of the Serious Disease Insurance Scheme in China.公私伙伴关系还是主仆关系?审视中国大病保险制度的实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051490.
2
Status of public-private partnership recognition and willingness to pay for private health care in China.中国公私合作伙伴关系认可现状及对私人医疗保健的支付意愿。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Apr;34(2):e1188-e1199. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2757. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Chinese residents' educational disparity and social insurance coverage.中国居民的教育差距与社会保险覆盖情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Aug 13;31(7):746-756. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0098.
4
Medical Insurance Information Systems in China: Mixed Methods Study.中国医疗保险信息系统:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Sep 1;8(9):e18780. doi: 10.2196/18780.
5
Public-private partnership in care provision for ageing-in-place: A comparative study in Guangdong, China.就地养老服务中的公私伙伴关系:中国广东的一项比较研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2023 Mar;42(1):90-97. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13151. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Benefit of China's Social Health Insurance Schemes: Trend Analysis and Associated Factors Since Health Reform.中国社会医疗保险计划的效益:医改以来的趋势分析及相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115672.
7
Public vs private administration of rural health insurance schemes: a comparative study in Zhejiang of China.农村健康保险计划的公共与私人管理:中国浙江的比较研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jul;8(3):269-88. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000163. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
8
Determinants of Health Insurance Coverage among People Aged 45 and over in China: Who Buys Public, Private and Multiple Insurance.中国45岁及以上人群医疗保险覆盖情况的决定因素:谁购买公共保险、私人保险和多重保险。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161774. eCollection 2016.
9
The implementation of Public-Private Partnership in China: A sustainable pathway?中国公私合营模式的实施:可持续之路?
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305051. eCollection 2024.
10
Understanding the complex relationships among actors involved in the implementation of public-private mix (PPM) for TB control in India, using social theory.运用社会理论理解印度实施结核公私混合(PPM)控制中涉及的各行为体之间复杂的关系。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 7;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0785-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Financial Toxicity in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.胰腺癌患者发生经济毒性的风险因素
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70799. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70799.
2
Financial toxicity assessment and associated factors analysis of patients with cancer in China.中国癌症患者的财务毒性评估及相关因素分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Apr 14;31(5):264. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07714-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Economics of Public Health: Missing Pieces to the Puzzle of Health System Reform.公共卫生经济学:卫生系统改革难题中缺失的部分。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec;52 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2275-2284. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12782.
2
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2016-25: Price Increases, Aging Push Sector To 20 Percent Of Economy.《2016 - 2025年国家卫生支出预测:价格上涨、人口老龄化推动该领域支出占经济总量达20%》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):553-563. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1627. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
National Health Spending: Faster Growth In 2015 As Coverage Expands And Utilization Increases.国家医疗支出:随着医保覆盖范围扩大和医疗服务利用增加,2015年支出增长加快。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):166-176. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1330. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
An evaluation of the Public Health Responsibility Deal: Informants' experiences and views of the development, implementation and achievements of a pledge-based, public-private partnership to improve population health in England.对公共卫生责任协议的评估:举报人对一项基于承诺的公私合作伙伴关系在英格兰改善民众健康方面的发展、实施情况及成果的经验和看法。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Europe sees mixed results from public-private partnerships for building and managing health care facilities and services.欧洲在公私合作伙伴关系建设和管理医疗保健设施和服务方面取得了喜忧参半的结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):146-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1223.
6
Public-private partnerships for health: their main targets, their diversity, and their future directions.卫生领域的公私伙伴关系:其主要目标、多样性及未来方向。
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(8):713-20. Epub 2001 Oct 24.
7
In pursuit of an improving National Health Service.致力于改善国民医疗服务体系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):102-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.102.
8
Can competition enhance efficiency in health care? Lessons from the reform of the U.K. national health service.竞争能否提高医疗保健效率?来自英国国民医疗服务体系改革的经验教训。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Nov;39(10):1438-45. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90238-0.