Boroditsky L
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, CA 94305-2130, USA.
Cognition. 2000 Apr 14;75(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00073-6.
The present paper evaluates the claim that abstract conceptual domains are structured through metaphorical mappings from domains grounded directly in experience. In particular, the paper asks whether the abstract domain of time gets its relational structure from the more concrete domain of space. Relational similarities between space and time are outlined along with several explanations of how these similarities may have arisen. Three experiments designed to distinguish between these explanations are described. The results indicate that (1) the domains of space and time do share conceptual structure, (2) spatial relational information is just as useful for thinking about time as temporal information, and (3) with frequent use, mappings between space and time come to be stored in the domain of time and so thinking about time does not necessarily require access to spatial schemas. These findings provide some of the first empirical evidence for Metaphoric Structuring. It appears that abstract domains such as time are indeed shaped by metaphorical mappings from more concrete and experiential domains such as space.
本文评估了这样一种观点,即抽象概念域是通过从直接基于经验的域进行隐喻映射来构建的。具体而言,本文探讨时间的抽象域是否从更具体的空间域获得其关系结构。概述了空间和时间之间的关系相似性,以及对这些相似性可能如何产生的几种解释。描述了旨在区分这些解释的三个实验。结果表明:(1)空间和时间域确实共享概念结构;(2)空间关系信息对于思考时间与时间信息同样有用;(3)随着频繁使用,空间和时间之间的映射开始存储在时间域中,因此思考时间不一定需要访问空间图式。这些发现为隐喻构建提供了一些首批实证证据。看来,诸如时间之类的抽象域确实是由来自诸如空间之类更具体和经验性域的隐喻映射塑造的。