• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

额部头颅侧位片中下颌角点和下颌角前切迹点识别的有效性。

Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms.

作者信息

Legrell P E, Nyquist H, Isberg A

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Umeå University, Sweden.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2000 Apr;70(2):157-64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0157:VOIOGA>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0157:VOIOGA>2.0.CO;2
PMID:10833005
Abstract

This study was designed to develop a method of transferring gonion from lateral to frontal cephalograms, and to use this method as gold standard when evaluating observer performance in identifying gonion in frontal cephalograms. Observer ability to identify antegonion was also evaluated. There was a range of 28 mm in the observers' identification of gonion and a statistically significant deviation from gold standard. The factors "observer" and "cephalogram," regarded as random effects in an ANOVA analysis, and their interaction, each influenced the result, P < .001. The deviation from the mean of all observations for antegonion ranged 8 mm with "cephalogram" having a statistically significant influence. The results suggest that neither gonion nor antegonion can be routinely used as valid landmarks in frontal cephalograms. Gonion can, however, be used if first identified in a lateral cephalogram and transferred to a paired frontal cephalogram aided by radiographic indicators combined with a bilateral scrutiny of projection geometry in different planes through gonion and indicator.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种将下颌角从侧位头影测量片转移至正位头影测量片的方法,并在评估观察者识别正位头影测量片中下颌角的表现时,将该方法用作金标准。同时也评估了观察者识别下颌前点的能力。观察者对下颌角的识别存在28毫米的差异范围,且与金标准存在统计学上的显著偏差。在方差分析中被视为随机效应的“观察者”和“头影测量片”因素及其交互作用,均对结果产生影响,P <.001。下颌前点与所有观察均值的偏差范围为8毫米,“头影测量片”具有统计学上的显著影响。结果表明,在下颌正位片中,下颌角和下颌前点均不能常规用作有效的标志点。然而,如果首先在侧位头影测量片中识别出下颌角,并借助射线照相指标以及通过下颌角和指标在不同平面进行的双侧投影几何结构仔细检查,将其转移到配对的正位头影测量片上,则下颌角可以使用。

相似文献

1
Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms.额部头颅侧位片中下颌角点和下颌角前切迹点识别的有效性。
Angle Orthod. 2000 Apr;70(2):157-64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0157:VOIOGA>2.0.CO;2.
2
Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis.通过聚类分析对面部不对称进行分类。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):279.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.017.
3
Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.锥形束计算机断层扫描头颅定位误差与传统数字头颅定位误差。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):e289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.024.
4
Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines.从后前位头影测量片评估面部不对称:参考线的有效性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):512-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602570347.
5
Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.下颌线性测量:曲面体层片与头颅侧位片的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Mar;46(2):147-53. doi: 10.1597/07-123.1. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
6
Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.正颌外科治疗面部不对称的特征及矫治效果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.039.
7
The reproducibility of Johnston's cephalometric superimposition method.约翰斯顿头影测量叠加法的可重复性。
Aust Orthod J. 1990 Oct;11(4):227-31.
8
Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.显示器上显示的头颅侧位X线片上标志点识别的可靠性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.036.
9
Effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation method to predict postpeak circumpubertal growth of craniofacial structures.颈椎成熟度法预测青春期后期颅面结构生长的效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.018.
10
Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.应用锥形束 CT 合成头影测量与传统头影测量技术对标志点识别的可重复性的影响:专业标定方案的作用
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Oct;39(7):414-23. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31924248.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of transverse width indices for diagnosing maxillary transverse deficiency.用于诊断上颌横向发育不足的横向宽度指数的比较评估
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 17;24(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04580-4.
2
Comparative analysis of craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders: a cross-sectional study.有和没有颞下颌关节紊乱症状的受试者颅面部不对称的比较分析:一项横断面研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun 30;49(3):125-134. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.125.
3
Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.
在正位头颅侧位片上进行标志点识别时侧位头颅侧位片的益处。
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):32-40. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.1.32. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry.颅面及面部人体测量学的标准化命名法。
Int J Legal Med. 2016 May;130(3):863-79. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1292-1. Epub 2015 Dec 11.